Tanya Harding has been seen hanging out at the ACC.

That or Lou decides that "an unfortunate set of circumstances" is going to happen to ol' Jonny Berns
- WingmanWillie

a series of unfortunate events you mean?

Oil win the lottery and we end up 5th ish


do we offer our pick and Morgan Rielly for the 1st?
- pinksocked

Negative. We pick 5th and get another Morgan Rielly.

why dont we send a mid pick ( or a jet) to Nashville for Veseys rights, sign him ( if he wants to play in TO)and let him burn a year?


or why dosnt Boston, its between TO and them

Oil win the lottery and we end up 5th ish


do we offer our pick and Morgan Rielly for the 1st?
- pinksocked

no, moving rielly would be a terrible decision. if we finish 5th we move down. from 5 to 9 they are basically the same. add the extra assets, then use those assets to move up from pitts pick.

Negative. We pick 5th and get another Morgan Rielly.
- TheMussel

I was gonna fill that spot with the Pens pick ( dman) like Bean etc

why dont we send a mid pick ( or a jet) to Nashville for Veseys rights, sign him ( if he wants to play in TO)and let him burn a year?


or why dosnt Boston, its between TO and them
- pinksocked

leaf don't have enough games remaining to burn a year of his ELC, so really no point when we can get him for free

leaf don't have enough games remaining to burn a year of his ELC, so really no point when we can get him for free
- matt1337

why? he cant suit up for 1 game? or how many does he need to play

Oil win the lottery and we end up 5th ish


do we offer our pick and Morgan Rielly for the 1st?
- pinksocked

Are you (frank)ing joking?

That would be the dumbest move Leafs have made in decades

why? he cant suit up for 1 game? or how many does he need to play
- pinksocked

pretty sure it's 10 that he needs to play in

a series of unfortunate events you mean?
- matt1337

Nope. That quote is straight from the mouth of the boss himself

I was gonna fill that spot with the Pens pick ( dman) like Bean etc
- pinksocked

Chrychryn or Juolevi at 5, another d-man at pens pick, build from the D out.

Oil win the lottery and we end up 5th ish


do we offer our pick and Morgan Rielly for the 1st?
- pinksocked

yikes

Are you (frank)ing joking?

That would be the dumbest move Leafs have made in decades
- WingmanWillie

No i wasnt (frank)ing joking, #44 is replaceable, id do it

leaf don't have enough games remaining to burn a year of his ELC, so really no point when we can get him for free
- matt1337

he's over 20, so i don't think number of games matter.

Nope. That quote is straight from the mouth of the boss himself
- WingmanWillie

i was referencing the popular kids books that jim carrey starred in the movie (actor, not the goalie that reimer wasn't supposed to turn into)

Chrychryn or Juolevi at 5, another d-man at pens pick, build from the D out.
- TheMussel

just loading up on D? not sure I like that for both picks

Im assuming it works both ways (I dont have kids) but if your (frank) up of a parent, you kids will be (frank) ups ...good work
- pinksocked

We were lucky, Oldest will be a Psychologist in a couple of months and our youngest is a Medical office manager, as well as a great level 2 gymnastic coach.

No i wasnt (frank)ing joking, #44 is replaceable, id do it
- pinksocked

Thank goodness you don't run the team.

I still find it hard to believe you aren't actually trolling. Give up our best Dman, who is 22 and only getting better, plays every situation and is leaned on the most by the coach, and a 5th overall pick which could end up being a very good forward as well for another very good forward.

That makes absolutely no sense

Chrychryn or Juolevi at 5, another d-man at pens pick, build from the D out.
- TheMussel

if they guaranteed stamkos was coming, i'd be fine with that. if not, no thanks. also, trade down from 5 to get one of those d, can get either at 7-9 most likely.

i was referencing the popular kids books that jim carrey starred in the movie (actor, not the goalie that reimer wasn't supposed to turn into)
- matt1337

I'm familiar with Lemony Snicket, Count Olaf ftw

Here's a novel concept

Do nothing with the TOR 1st round pick, except draft with it

meepo

if they guaranteed stamkos was coming, i'd be fine with that. if not, no thanks. also, trade down from 5 to get one of those d, can get either at 7-9 most likely.
- matt1337

Why? this team is heavy on forward prospects..

Thank goodness you don't run the team.

I still find it hard to believe you aren't actually trolling. Give up our best Dman, who is 22 and only getting better, plays every situation and is leaned on the most by the coach, and a 5th overall pick which could end up being a very good forward as well for another very good forward.

That makes absolutely no sense
- WingmanWillie

it would set us back more than benefiting us that's for sure. nylander and dubois/mcleod as a 1a 1b situation (not close to the 1a 1b in pitts, but still a good situation for us)

Why? this team is heavy on forward prospects..
- ClarksonDavid

not centers though. we have a plethora of wingers. if we know for sure our next 10 years will be stammer and nylander as our 1 and 2, we can take 2 d.