Garth

SabresBuzz ‏@SabresBuzz 4m4 minutes ago
Murray and Bylsma are searching high and low for a QB. If the can't trade for Cam Fowler, they should go after Erik Karlsson
- yen6d1

Yea, I was gonna say, who's our plan B if we can't get Fowler? The best D man in the NHL? Good planning

Yea, I was gonna say, who's our plan B if we can't get Fowler? The best D man in the NHL? Good planning
- sbroads24

If only somebody would have plan b'd garth.

Yea, I was gonna say, who's our plan B if we can't get Fowler? The best D man in the NHL? Good planning
- sbroads24

I've heard Plan C is Duncan Keith

OMG look at his reply!

@SabresBuzz would need to give up a ton for karlson
Reply Retweet
Like

SabresBuzz ‏@SabresBuzz 59s59 seconds ago
@mjgatas Murray has a ton. Zemgus, Pysyk, Baptiste, 2nd rounder. Sens are about to blow up roster.
- yen6d1

Ugh, and this is why the fans here get a bad wrap.

Ugh, and this is why the fans here get a bad wrap.
- ImThatGuy

my favorite Garth move of all time was last year after we had last locked up he switched to anti tank....yet his twitter profile was "tank for McEichel"

If only somebody would have plan b'd garth.
- Der Kaiser

*tips cap* very well done

Garth

SabresBuzz ‏@SabresBuzz 4m4 minutes ago
Murray and Bylsma are searching high and low for a QB. If the can't trade for Cam Fowler, they should go after Erik Karlsson
- yen6d1

OH Gaff

I've heard Plan C is Duncan Keith
- mattmoulson

Hope in the Delorian crank it up to 88 and go back and get Bobby Orr

OMG look at his reply!

@SabresBuzz would need to give up a ton for karlson
Reply Retweet
Like

SabresBuzz ‏@SabresBuzz 59s59 seconds ago
@mjgatas Murray has a ton. Zemgus, Pysyk, Baptiste, 2nd rounder. Sens are about to blow up roster.
- yen6d1

And then when suggested that the Sabres would have to include a couple first round picks in that trade scenario, he followed up with this beauty....


bresBuzz ‏@SabresBuzz · 15m15 minutes ago

@Sabres_Fans @mjgatas Murray doesn't trade 1st rounders

*tips cap* very well done
- yen6d1

When my kid was like 4 or 5 he used to run around down in the basement with a plastic ball and little hockey stick yelling in his best RJ voice "MAXIM AFINOGENOV, MAXIM AFINOGENOV, MAXIM AFINOGENOV, MAXIM AFINOGENOV."

With that Avi, you'll always be ok by me.

If only somebody would have plan b'd garth.
- Der Kaiser

Oh my

Hope in the Delorian crank it up to 88 and go back and get Bobby Orr
- hubie

We can only hop that might work out.

Dreger: Highly unlikely Stamkos comes to Toronto

Per TSN
- SABRES 89[/quote
Where did you see this ?

Still not sold on the whole Stamkos idea. I'd prefer to go after a top end winger (Eberle, Hall, Pacioretty, ect), at a lower cost, less risk than Stamkos. I just can't see paying a guy 11+ mill for 6-7 years, who prefers center, to shift over to wing. On top of the fact he's missing a rib, and has blood clot issues. If I'm paying that much, I need a fully intact hockey player.

Still not sold on the whole Stamkos idea. I'd prefer to go after a top end winger (Eberle, Hall, Pacioretty, ect), at a lower cost, less risk than Stamkos. I just can't see paying a guy 11+ mill for 6-7 years, who prefers center, to shift over to wing. On top of the fact he's missing a rib, and has blood clot issues. If I'm paying that much, I need a fully intact hockey player.
- bobmack13

Stamkos, free
Eberle, Hall, Pacioretty

Going to cost picks players or prospects.

Hall would cost you Risto
Eberle would cost you Someone on the same caliber as Hamonic
Pacioretty (I already tried Girgensons and a 1st is not good enough)

[quote=SABRES 89]Dreger: Highly unlikely Stamkos comes to Toronto

Per TSN
- Pegullaville[/quote
Where did you see this ?

http://www.tsn.ca/radio/t...comes-to-toronto-1.468379

Stamkos, free
Eberle, Hall, Pacioretty

Going to cost picks players or prospects.

Hall would cost you Risto
Eberle would cost you Someone on the same caliber as Hamonic
Pacioretty (I already tried Girgensons and a 1st is not good enough)
- ImThatGuy

Please give me Bergevin's number I want to talk to him about this.

Still not sold on the whole Stamkos idea. I'd prefer to go after a top end winger (Eberle, Hall, Pacioretty, ect), at a lower cost, less risk than Stamkos. I just can't see paying a guy 11+ mill for 6-7 years, who prefers center, to shift over to wing. On top of the fact he's missing a rib, and has blood clot issues. If I'm paying that much, I need a fully intact hockey player.
- bobmack13

1. Stamkos costs nothing but $$, those guys $$ and players
2. Eichel would move to wing - see how he played with O'Reilly at wing the last couple of games
3. Not a rib like you think - a small one, up top, no impact from this
4. Not a blood clot issue like McCormick, this one isn't an issue going forward

Stamkos, free
Eberle, Hall, Pacioretty

Going to cost picks players or prospects.

Hall would cost you Risto
Eberle would cost you Someone on the same caliber as Hamonic
Pacioretty (I already tried Girgensons and a 1st is not good enough)
- ImThatGuy

We've got plenty of room money/pick wise to be creative to bring in high end talent. Sinking all of that money into Stamkos assuming that he's going to be fine worries me.
The team is on a solid path right now, and I don't think that we need Stamkos given his circumstances.
Stud winger, stud offensive d-man, and here we go. Yes it will cost, but Murray can get it done.

We will be fine moving Eichel to the wing its not like he is a fo specialist

1. Stamkos costs nothing but $$, those guys $$ and players
2. Eichel would move to wing - see how he played with O'Reilly at wing the last couple of games
3. Not a rib like you think - a small one, up top, no impact from this
4. Not a blood clot issue like McCormick, this one isn't an issue going forward
- turbo044

If you can guarantee me that Stamkos will be the same , then I'm all in. My gut tells me long term, high dollar contract, .
Is he going to be scared going into corners, play tentative???
I can just see the boards if he does go down, they'll be looking for Murray's head on a spike.

We will be fine moving Eichel to the wing its not like he is a fo specialist
- hubie

If it came down to a decision between Eichel, ROR, and Stamkos i think ROR goes to wing

Eichel was drafted to be our #1C for the next 15 years...moving him now just slows down his progress

Stamkos may or may not demand to stay at C if he were to come here...not worth upsetting

ROR just seems to be the odd man out...in a pinch (or when we really need a faceoff) he can shift back into C

If it came down to a decision between Eichel, ROR, and Stamkos i think ROR goes to wing

Eichel was drafted to be our #1C for the next 15 years...moving him now just slows down his progress

Stamkos may or may not demand to stay at C if he were to come here...not worth upsetting

ROR just seems to be the odd man out...in a pinch (or when we really need a faceoff) he can shift back into C
- feetontheair22

Reinhart can teach him the finer points of Wing after practice.

If it came down to a decision between Eichel, ROR, and Stamkos i think ROR goes to wing

Eichel was drafted to be our #1C for the next 15 years...moving him now just slows down his progress

Stamkos may or may not demand to stay at C if he were to come here...not worth upsetting

ROR just seems to be the odd man out...in a pinch (or when we really need a faceoff) he can shift back into C
- feetontheair22

Long term yes hed be on the wing for now he wants to win hell move to wing

If it came down to a decision between Eichel, ROR, and Stamkos i think ROR goes to wing

Eichel was drafted to be our #1C for the next 15 years...moving him now just slows down his progress

Stamkos may or may not demand to stay at C if he were to come here...not worth upsetting

ROR just seems to be the odd man out...in a pinch (or when we really need a faceoff) he can shift back into C
- feetontheair22

Why would we make our future captain in ROR an odd man out??? Why shift Eichel, just doesn't make sense to bring in Stamkos to disrupt the good that we have going.