Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Carol Schram: Vancouver Canucks: NHL's First-Round Heats Up, Utica Comets Drop Game 1
Author Message
classic321
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 07.04.2012

Apr 23 @ 8:04 PM ET




The Camera's caught Andrew Shaw doing his best Burrows impersonation.

Grabs a fist full of Pietrbngelo's hair during a scrum.
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Apr 23 @ 8:04 PM ET
Hutton is still a maybe for me. I know he's Jesus on this board but to me he's statistically the second worst defensive d-man on the team (Behind Bart who is also awful), and that means no top-4.
- neem55


His stats wouldn't have been anywhere near as bad if his minutes were handled typical of a rookie player. Circumstances couldn't allow that with Hamhuis, Edler and Sbisa out for long term injuries.

Never played pro and played as a top 2 D for much of the season... surprised you wouldn't consider this in your criticisms.
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Apr 23 @ 8:11 PM ET
the series is 2-2, Anahiem is very good (before the season the odds on favorite to win the cup). the game is 2-1 and very close, let's not paint a false picture here.
- neem55


False picture? How are the facts false?


boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Apr 23 @ 8:12 PM ET
Burrows is a hair puller but Shaw is a homophobic hair puller.
- A_SteamingLombardi


Burrows and Shaw... best cat fight ever.
LeftCoaster
Anaheim Ducks
Location: Duck City, CA
Joined: 07.03.2009

Apr 23 @ 8:14 PM ET
My wife was making me do yard stuff again, damn big yards, what are we talking about? I'm not reading back like Booner does
LeftCoaster
Anaheim Ducks
Location: Duck City, CA
Joined: 07.03.2009

Apr 23 @ 8:17 PM ET
Blues/Hawks....this should be a good one! Go Blues
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Apr 23 @ 8:21 PM ET
Blues/Hawks....this should be a good one! Go Blues
- LeftCoaster

Still watching Ducks vs Preds.

This was Vantel & Neem earlier today...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUOlTSnUg4E
LeftCoaster
Anaheim Ducks
Location: Duck City, CA
Joined: 07.03.2009

Apr 23 @ 8:24 PM ET
Still watching Ducks vs Preds.

This was Vantel & Neem earlier today...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUOlTSnUg4E

- Marwood



I put my money on Vantel, experience is greater than enthusiasm.
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Apr 23 @ 8:29 PM ET
My wife was making me do yard stuff again, damn big yards, what are we talking about? I'm not reading back like Booner does
- LeftCoaster


Did you see my post the other day about me dropping my phone in the lake while trying to take a pic of a 8 pound trout in the net?
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Apr 23 @ 8:30 PM ET


I put my money on Vantel, experience is greater than enthusiasm.

- LeftCoaster

Atta boy
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Apr 23 @ 8:34 PM ET
Burrows and Shaw... best cat fight ever.

- boonerbuck

If Burrows still had some bite left in his game we wouldn't be pushing him out the door
LeftCoaster
Anaheim Ducks
Location: Duck City, CA
Joined: 07.03.2009

Apr 23 @ 8:36 PM ET
Did you see my post the other day about me dropping my phone in the lake while trying to take a pic of a 8 pound trout in the net?

- boonerbuck

Ya I saw that....bummer


Edit: nice fish though
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Apr 23 @ 8:38 PM ET
Nice shot
LeftCoaster
Anaheim Ducks
Location: Duck City, CA
Joined: 07.03.2009

Apr 23 @ 8:43 PM ET
Blues up 3-1 already
LeftCoaster
Anaheim Ducks
Location: Duck City, CA
Joined: 07.03.2009

Apr 23 @ 8:51 PM ET
Tarasenko (16th overall pick) has more playoff goals in 18 games than Rick Nash has in 65 games
classic321
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 07.04.2012

Apr 23 @ 8:57 PM ET
Tarasenko (16th overall pick) has more playoff goals in 18 games than Rick Nash has in 65 games
- LeftCoaster



Rick Nash and Joe Thornton are two guys I would not want in the playoffs.
neem55
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 02.02.2012

Apr 23 @ 8:59 PM ET
His stats wouldn't have been anywhere near as bad if his minutes were handled typical of a rookie player. Circumstances couldn't allow that with Hamhuis, Edler and Sbisa out for long term injuries.

Never played pro and played as a top 2 D for much of the season... surprised you wouldn't consider this in your criticisms.

- boonerbuck


There are plenty of rookies and d-men his age playing more minutes and that are better defensively. I agree, his minutes should have been less. That's more of a reflection of his ability than age or experience. I hope he gets better defensively but think he's not very good without the puck, as I've said many times.
I have considered that he played top-4 (not top 2) minutes, he was moved into more minutes when Edler got injured and his numbers plummeted, that doesn't suggest someone with top-4 next year written on him but, in fact, the opposite. It's hard to forecast beyond next year, he's definitely young enough that top-4 could happen eventually. I'm not that high on the guy, I like his offensive output is great though. Bottom pair next year is ideal.
neem55
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 02.02.2012

Apr 23 @ 9:04 PM ET


I put my money on Vantel, experience is greater than enthusiasm.

- LeftCoaster


Why are the Canucks out of the playoffs then
WhiteLie
Referee
Location: When youre 7 pages behind Dont bother catching up, you will never get that time back - Codes1087
Joined: 07.26.2010

Apr 23 @ 9:06 PM ET
Tarasenko (16th overall pick) has more playoff goals in 18 games than Rick Nash has in 65 games
- LeftCoaster


Rick Nash has definitely lost a step over the years, not nearly as explosive, but I still like his game come playoff time and would have him on my team (when cap hits don't count... ). He is a positive Corsi player, back checks, hits and is positionally sound but just snake bit this time of year. His shooting percentage in the playoffs is an abysmal 5% down from his usual 12.5% in the regular season
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Apr 23 @ 9:08 PM ET
Why are the Canucks out of the playoffs then
- neem55

I kick your ass man

Joking
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Apr 23 @ 9:11 PM ET
Rick Nash has definitely lost a step over the years, not nearly as explosive, but I still like his game come playoff time and would have him on my team (when cap hits don't count... ). He is a positive Corsi player, back checks, hits and is positionally sound but just snake bit this time of year. His shooting percentage in the playoffs is an abysmal 5% down from his usual 12.5% in the regular season
- WhiteLie



We should get him on Canucks . Playoffs don't matter
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Apr 23 @ 9:12 PM ET
There are plenty of rookies and d-men his age playing more minutes and that are better defensively. I agree, his minutes should have been less. That's more of a reflection of his ability than age or experience. I hope he gets better defensively but think he's not very good without the puck, as I've said many times.
I have considered that he played top-4 (not top 2) minutes, he was moved into more minutes when Edler got injured and his numbers plummeted, that doesn't suggest someone with top-4 next year written on him but, in fact, the opposite. It's hard to forecast beyond next year, he's definitely young enough that top-4 could happen eventually. I'm not that high on the guy, I like his offensive output is great though. Bottom pair next year is ideal.

- neem55

How high were you on Tanev after his rookie year?
dbot
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down
Joined: 10.22.2008

Apr 23 @ 9:12 PM ET
Rick Nash and Joe Thornton are two guys I would not want in the playoffs.
- classic321


i'd take Big Joe and that hillbilly beard of his!
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Apr 23 @ 9:16 PM ET
i'd take Big Joe and that hillbilly beard of his!
- dbot

Until he makes you squeal like a pig.
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Apr 23 @ 9:21 PM ET
It was a rhetorical question but thanks. We can take a D at 33rd and 63rd. That's Josi and Weber right there. Why do we need any other D?
- CanuckDon


Thats why we r not takin D 1st round. Only trading down will we if JB sees it a better option.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next