Location: Isn't Cooley 5"11? You know who else is 5"11? Sydney Crosby. - Scabeh Joined: 04.06.2011
Jul 28 @ 3:34 PM ET
I know that many of you wanted me to write a blog about Komarov, because quite frankly I'm smarter than all of you, and that includes all the GMs and other NHL executives who make money doing hockey stuff while I sweep the spilled sprinkles off the floor at Menchies.
Basically, I'm a genius. But I'm so smart, nobody else can fully comprehend how smart I am.
Lucky for you, I'm going to let you in on my geniousness.
Komarov sucks. No, it's true. I'm going to lay it out for you, but I couldn't possibly think you will understand it.
1. Look at his Robertson scatter-plot adjusted zone poke-check differentials:
Obviously we aren't going to heavily weight his efforts on Tuesdays in away buildings, because stuff. If you adjust for some sort of bias I can't really describe, it's obvious Komaraov is a God.
2. Komarov gets a lot of offensive zone starts with Gardiner, so obviously his Harrington zippity-blippity benchmark T-quadrant indicators are off. I mean, just take a look:
I look forward to calling you all idiots in response to your posts.
Oh, and I've never actually watched an NHL game live.
Location: I really don't care about Nylander, I really hope he gets injured and is out - Makita Joined: 07.14.2011
Jul 28 @ 3:36 PM ET
I know that many of you wanted me to write a blog about Komarov, because quite frankly I'm smarter than all of you, and that includes all the GMs and other NHL executives who make money doing hockey stuff while I sweep the spilled sprinkles off the floor at Menchies.
Basically, I'm a genius. But I'm so smart, nobody else can fully comprehend how smart I am.
Lucky for you, I'm going to let you in on my geniousness.
Komarov sucks. No, it's true. I'm going to lay it out for you, but I couldn't possibly think you will understand it.
1. Look at his Robertson scatter-plot adjusted zone poke-check differentials:
Obviously we aren't going to heavily weight his efforts on Tuesdays in away buildings, because stuff. If you adjust for some sort of bias I can't really describe, it's obvious Komaraov is a God.
2. Komarov gets a lot of offensive zone starts with Gardiner, so obviously his Harrington zippity-blippity benchmark T-quadrant indicators are off. I mean, just take a look:
I look forward to calling you all idiots in response to your posts.
Oh, and I've never actually watched an NHL game live.
Location: RELEASE THE LATVIAN!, ON Joined: 11.09.2009
Jul 28 @ 3:38 PM ET
I know that many of you wanted me to write a blog about Komarov, because quite frankly I'm smarter than all of you, and that includes all the GMs and other NHL executives who make money doing hockey stuff while I sweep the spilled sprinkles off the floor at Menchies.
Basically, I'm a genius. But I'm so smart, nobody else can fully comprehend how smart I am.
Lucky for you, I'm going to let you in on my geniousness.
Komarov sucks. No, it's true. I'm going to lay it out for you, but I couldn't possibly think you will understand it.
1. Look at his Robertson scatter-plot adjusted zone poke-check differentials:
Obviously we aren't going to heavily weight his efforts on Tuesdays in away buildings, because stuff. If you adjust for some sort of bias I can't really describe, it's obvious Komaraov is a God.
2. Komarov gets a lot of offensive zone starts with Gardiner, so obviously his Harrington zippity-blippity benchmark T-quadrant indicators are off. I mean, just take a look:
I look forward to calling you all idiots in response to your posts.
Oh, and I've never actually watched an NHL game live.
That (frank)ing ruined the whole goddamn thing. - Scabeh
Funny part is, that was the whole point of the beginning credit sequence showing his parents getting killed again. All so his dad's last words could be Martha. Scarred for life!
I saw Batman V Superman last night and I didn't think it was half as horrible as I was expecting. I actually kind of liked it *braces for impending ridicule* - 1979AD
It's okay to like something that others don't. It's statistically impossible to have a mass of people all feel the same way about a film.
Location: OEL is one of the greatest players of his generation - James Tanner Joined: 06.21.2012
Jul 28 @ 3:43 PM ET
I know that many of you wanted me to write a blog about Komarov, because quite frankly I'm smarter than all of you, and that includes all the GMs and other NHL executives who make money doing hockey stuff while I sweep the spilled sprinkles off the floor at Menchies.
Basically, I'm a genius. But I'm so smart, nobody else can fully comprehend how smart I am.
Lucky for you, I'm going to let you in on my geniousness.
Komarov sucks. No, it's true. I'm going to lay it out for you, but I couldn't possibly think you will understand it.
1. Look at his Robertson scatter-plot adjusted zone poke-check differentials:
Obviously we aren't going to heavily weight his efforts on Tuesdays in away buildings, because stuff. If you adjust for some sort of bias I can't really describe, it's obvious Komaraov is a God.
2. Komarov gets a lot of offensive zone starts with Gardiner, so obviously his Harrington zippity-blippity benchmark T-quadrant indicators are off. I mean, just take a look:
I look forward to calling you all idiots in response to your posts.
Oh, and I've never actually watched an NHL game live.
Location: Tavares is sledge hockey level - Islesrbettr, ON Joined: 08.02.2006
Jul 28 @ 3:43 PM ET
I know that many of you wanted me to write a blog about Komarov, because quite frankly I'm smarter than all of you, and that includes all the GMs and other NHL executives who make money doing hockey stuff while I sweep the spilled sprinkles off the floor at Menchies.
Basically, I'm a genius. But I'm so smart, nobody else can fully comprehend how smart I am.
Lucky for you, I'm going to let you in on my geniousness.
Komarov sucks. No, it's true. I'm going to lay it out for you, but I couldn't possibly think you will understand it.
1. Look at his Robertson scatter-plot adjusted zone poke-check differentials:
Obviously we aren't going to heavily weight his efforts on Tuesdays in away buildings, because stuff. If you adjust for some sort of bias I can't really describe, it's obvious Komaraov is a God.
2. Komarov gets a lot of offensive zone starts with Gardiner, so obviously his Harrington zippity-blippity benchmark T-quadrant indicators are off. I mean, just take a look:
I look forward to calling you all idiots in response to your posts.
Oh, and I've never actually watched an NHL game live.
Location: We’re Too Old, Boston Joined: 04.03.2013
Jul 28 @ 3:45 PM ET
This is mostly true. But sometimes people like something that's objectively poop. Like the Sens and The Bachelorette. They deserve to be ridiculed. - 1979AD
I know that many of you wanted me to write a blog about Komarov, because quite frankly I'm smarter than all of you, and that includes all the GMs and other NHL executives who make money doing hockey stuff while I sweep the spilled sprinkles off the floor at Menchies.
Basically, I'm a genius. But I'm so smart, nobody else can fully comprehend how smart I am.
Lucky for you, I'm going to let you in on my geniousness.
Komarov sucks. No, it's true. I'm going to lay it out for you, but I couldn't possibly think you will understand it.
1. Look at his Robertson scatter-plot adjusted zone poke-check differentials:
Obviously we aren't going to heavily weight his efforts on Tuesdays in away buildings, because stuff. If you adjust for some sort of bias I can't really describe, it's obvious Komaraov is a God.
2. Komarov gets a lot of offensive zone starts with Gardiner, so obviously his Harrington zippity-blippity benchmark T-quadrant indicators are off. I mean, just take a look:
I look forward to calling you all idiots in response to your posts.
Oh, and I've never actually watched an NHL game live.
Location: The centre of the hockey universe Joined: 07.31.2006
Jul 28 @ 3:46 PM ET
This is mostly true. But sometimes people like something that's objectively poop. Like the Sens and The Bachelorette. They deserve to be ridiculed. - 1979AD
Did you know that the Toronto Star writes a summary of each Bachelorette show the next day?