Test your knowledge and common sense in this simple 10-question test.
Caution: This section contains sound science, not media hype, and may therefore contain material not suitable for young people trying to get a good grade in political correctness.
Location: Dude has all the personality of a lump of concrete. Just a complete lizard. Joined: 06.26.2006
Sep 9 @ 8:50 PM ET
Seems legit
Test your knowledge and common sense in this simple 10-question test.
Caution: This section contains sound science, not media hype, and may therefore contain material not suitable for young people trying to get a good grade in political correctness. - PhillySportsGuy
On September 10, 1931 most of the Eastern US was over 90 degrees. Minnesota reached 107 degrees, and 100 degree temperatures were recorded in New York State and Wisconsin. New York City was 96 degrees – 25 degrees warmer than in 2017.
Location: Dude has all the personality of a lump of concrete. Just a complete lizard. Joined: 06.26.2006
Sep 11 @ 11:13 PM ET
On September 10, 1931 most of the Eastern US was over 90 degrees. Minnesota reached 107 degrees, and 100 degree temperatures were recorded in New York State and Wisconsin. New York City was 96 degrees – 25 degrees warmer than in 2017.
seems like a textbook case of climate change - watsonnostaw
The climate always changes ............ it's natural, and has been doing so since the last ice age.
But for some reason, you seem to think it's NOT natural, and the Climate should be exactly the same as .......... well pick some point in time I guess, and for some reason you've been convinced that the only influence on the Climate, is human activity.......... and therefore you should cough up more taxes, that will do absoulutley nothing to change the Climate........ and there is no way we humans can.
The climate always changes ............ it's natural, and has been doing so since the last ice age.
But for some reason, you seem to think it's NOT natural, and the Climate should be exactly the same as .......... well pick some point in time I guess, and for some reason you've been convinced that the only influence on the Climate, is human activity.......... and therefore you should cough up more taxes, that will do absoulutley nothing to change the Climate........ and there is no way we humans can. - D0PPELGANGER
even if the chance was 1% that man-made climate change is real, is every life on the planet worth that risk?
even if the chance was 1% that man-made climate change is real, is every life on the planet worth that risk?
how dumb are you? - twiztedmike
Do you actually believe the minuscule, if any, effect human activity has on the climate, is going to put "every life on the planet ... at risk"?
I could ask you the same question, you asked me.
The Myth that Human activity is "greatly impacting the climate" has already being proven to be a method to convince people to be overly taxed, and have money re0distrubuted to third world countries.
The climate always changes ............ it's natural, and has been doing so since the last ice age.
But for some reason, you seem to think it's NOT natural, and the Climate should be exactly the same as .......... well pick some point in time I guess, and for some reason you've been convinced that the only influence on the Climate, is human activity.......... and therefore you should cough up more taxes, that will do absoulutley nothing to change the Climate........ and there is no way we humans can. - D0PPELGANGER
You are a lame strawman hack. Literally nobody is making that argument here. But as usual, you can't have an honest discussion on the topic because you read a few blogs and watch some youtube vids by some amateur sleuths who are smarter than you (which is hilarious because those guys are pretty dumb).
solar panels create 300 times more toxic waste per kilowatt-hour than nuclear reactors they are laden with lead, chromium, cadmium and other heavy metals damned by environmentalists; employ hazardous materials such as sulfuric acid and phosphine gas in their manufacture; and emit nitrogen trifluoride, a powerful greenhouse gas that is 17,200 times more potent than CO2 as a greenhouse gas over a 100-year time period.
