Scabeh
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: The Slovakian Jagr, QC Joined: 02.25.2007
|
|
|
I can't see how people do not see Horvat's ultimate upside. Yes, the Centre position is pretty logged jammed at the moment but I am pretty sure every other team would want him. He is far from over. - Beatle_john
There's just no way he's not better than Sutter?
Right? |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
There's just no way he's not better than Sutter?
Right? - Scabeh
Your not so subtle trolling is annoying....get lost |
|
|
|
There's just no way he's not better than Sutter?
Right? - Scabeh
He's clearly better.
Sutter needs to put on 20ibs at least if he wants to be effective in the west. |
|
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla! Joined: 08.15.2014
|
|
|
cody 2.o - hillbillydeluxe
Horvat's Dad is calling Canucks mngt offices today to air his concerns about Bo's demotion to the 4th line in preseason. |
|
djlarose
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Burlington, VT Joined: 06.29.2011
|
|
|
This expansion draft is throwing a much bigger wrench in things than I would have expected. I hope Pedan clears. If so, this could prove to be pretty brilliant trying to get Spisa and Biega qualified. If one or the other had a major injury and fell short.... losing one of the main 3 D for nothing would be horrible. |
|
Makita
Referee Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: #theonlyrealfan, BC Joined: 02.16.2007
|
|
|
Thanks Carol! Horvat is a bust, Erikkson has been brutal so far and Virt will never make it oh, and Sbisa is our new #3 dman! Thanks for stopping by fellas - CanuckDon
Then you must be ecstatic that LV will be getting such a high ranking Dman for your new team. |
|
WhiteLie
Referee |
|
|
Location: When youre 7 pages behind Dont bother catching up, you will never get that time back - Codes1087 Joined: 07.26.2010
|
|
|
They are screwed if he got injured. - Beatle_john
They are screwing themselves if the actual goal is playoffs and not putting together the best roster possible. If Biega plays the first 18 games just to hit his threshold, that could be a season lost.
“I don’t believe you can make the playoffs in the first 20 games. But I do believe you can miss the playoffs in the first 20 games,”
http://globalnews.ca/news...pse-of-stanley-cup-teams/
http://nhl.nbcsports.com/...s-thanksgiving-standings/
American Thanksgiving, which is around 20 games into the season, has shown teams in a playoff position hold it 81% of the time. Biega might be fine, but if youre waiting until after game 20 to get Stecher in, you might've tossed a season in the garbage |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
Then you must be ecstatic that LV will be getting such a high ranking Dman for your new team. - Makita
I feel so blessed. What a wonderful day for all of Las Vegas |
|
kaptaan
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Turning a new Leaf, CA Joined: 09.29.2010
|
|
|
This expansion draft is throwing a much bigger wrench in things than I would have expected. I hope Pedan clears. If so, this could prove to be pretty brilliant trying to get Spisa and Biega qualified. If one or the other had a major injury and fell short.... losing one of the main 3 D for nothing would be horrible. - djlarose
i think every team is doing backflips to avoid losing players in the draft... imagine what's gonna be happening the year after when Quebec or whoever else joins and the young players that are currently unavailable will become available (ie: 3rd year players like Horvat)... etc... Teams won't be able to protect all the players they want to protect like they are right now....
|
|
djlarose
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Burlington, VT Joined: 06.29.2011
|
|
|
i think every team is doing backflips to avoid losing players in the draft... imagine what's gonna be happening the year after when Quebec or whoever else joins and the young players that are currently unavailable will become available (ie: 3rd year players like Horvat)... etc... Teams won't be able to protect all the players they want to protect like they are right now.... - kaptaan
I don't think Quebec is going to be the following year. I think they wait at least one more. It will still throw a wrench in the plans even then. |
|
DuranDuran
Calgary Flames |
|
|
Location: Quito Joined: 09.29.2015
|
|
|
I don't think Quebec is going to be the following year. I think they wait at least one more. It will still throw a wrench in the plans even then. - djlarose
I thought Carolina was going to move North? Was it was a lot cheaper for Quebec to just buy an existing team that is tanking financially. |
|
djlarose
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Burlington, VT Joined: 06.29.2011
|
|
|
I thought Carolina was going to move North? Was it was a lot cheaper for Quebec to just buy an existing team that is tanking financially. - DuranDuran
That would be great. Move them to QC and expand to Seattle. Keep 16 in both conferences. Best move the NHL could make. So, that means it probably wont happen that way |
|
DariusKnight
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: "The Alien has landed in Vancouver!" Joined: 03.09.2006
|
|
|
That would be great. Move them to QC and expand to Seattle. Keep 16 in both conferences. Best move the NHL could make. So, that means it probably wont happen that way - djlarose
Seattle won't happen, they want their NBA franchise back first, then maybe the NHL. There's 3 junior teams in the Seattle area or nearby including the Thunderbirds (Tri-Cities, Everett) that doesn't do that great financially or attendance-wise, that's not a good sign for an NHL team in Seattle. |
|
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla! Joined: 08.15.2014
|
|
|
Seattle won't happen, they want their NBA franchise back first, then maybe the NHL. There's 3 junior teams in the Seattle area or nearby including the Thunderbirds (Tri-Cities, Everett) that doesn't do that great financially or attendance-wise, that's not a good sign for an NHL team in Seattle. - DariusKnight
Ya Seattle is a tough call. At one time I thought they would be a lock for an NHL franchise, but after spending a week there during playoffs a few years back interest in NHL was pretty damn low. |
|
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla! Joined: 08.15.2014
|
|
|
Then you must be ecstatic that LV will be getting such a high ranking Dman for your new team. - Makita
Sbizza on PP1 for the las vegas black aces?
#loveit |
|
DariusKnight
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: "The Alien has landed in Vancouver!" Joined: 03.09.2006
|
|
|
Sbizza on PP1 for the las vegas black aces?
#loveit - LordHumungous
Tough call for LV to pick between Sbisa and Gaunce, Gaunce could be their #1C and Sbisa their #1D, that could be the difference between the President's Cup and Stanley Cup right there. |
|
Retinalz
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 01.31.2015
|
|
|
They are screwing themselves if the actual goal is playoffs and not putting together the best roster possible. If Biega plays the first 18 games just to hit his threshold, that could be a season lost.
http://globalnews.ca/news...pse-of-stanley-cup-teams/
http://nhl.nbcsports.com/...s-thanksgiving-standings/
American Thanksgiving, which is around 20 games into the season, has shown teams in a playoff position hold it 81% of the time. Biega might be fine, but if youre waiting until after game 20 to get Stecher in, you might've tossed a season in the garbage - WhiteLie
useless stat, Vancouver was in playoff spot by that time and missed out. Stuff happens and teams that are in get the wrong injuries, and teams that are out get a nice hot streak. You can't be planning based on this fact. heads will roll faster and farther if we lose one of Edler,Tanev,Guddy to LV because we pushed for the playoffs from the begining. I would also assume priority would be to play Sbisa over Biega to get his 29 games, Biega slots on once Sbisa is injured and gets his 19 games. |
|
Marwood
|
|
|
Location: Cumberland, BC Joined: 03.18.2010
|
|
|
Tough call for LV to pick between Sbisa and Gaunce, Gaunce could be their #1C and Sbisa their #1D, that could be the difference between the President's Cup and Stanley Cup right there. - DariusKnight
Quite the dilemma, indeed. |
|
Marwood
|
|
|
Location: Cumberland, BC Joined: 03.18.2010
|
|
|
useless stat, Vancouver was in playoff spot by that time and missed out. Stuff happens and teams that are in get the wrong injuries, and teams that are out get a nice hot streak. You can't be planning based on this fact. heads will roll faster and farther if we lose one of Edler,Tanev,Guddy to LV because we pushed for the playoffs from the begining. I would also assume priority would be to play Sbisa over Biega to get his 29 games, Biega slots on once Sbisa is injured and gets his 19 games. - Retinalz
|
|
WhiteLie
Referee |
|
|
Location: When youre 7 pages behind Dont bother catching up, you will never get that time back - Codes1087 Joined: 07.26.2010
|
|
|
useless stat, Vancouver was in playoff spot by that time and missed out. Stuff happens and teams that are in get the wrong injuries, and teams that are out get a nice hot streak. You can't be planning based on this fact. heads will roll faster and farther if we lose one of Edler,Tanev,Guddy to LV because we pushed for the playoffs from the begining. I would also assume priority would be to play Sbisa over Biega to get his 29 games, Biega slots on once Sbisa is injured and gets his 19 games. - Retinalz
Its hardly a useless stat if its well documented that over 80% of the time those teams make the playoffs in the past 10 years - it signifies the importance of a good start and getting points early. But really my point is that if they are making lineup decisions based on expansion draft ahead of the playoffs that they have been advocating for, brings more confusion to the situation. I have understood and support their competitive while retooling scenario, but this seems like an odd way to start a season |
|
DariusKnight
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: "The Alien has landed in Vancouver!" Joined: 03.09.2006
|
|
|
Its hardly a useless stat if its well documented that over 80% of the time those teams make the playoffs in the past 10 years - it signifies the importance of a good start and getting points early. But really my point is that if they are making lineup decisions based on expansion draft ahead of the playoffs that they have been advocating for, brings more confusion to the situation. I have understood and support their competitive while retooling scenario, but this seems like an odd way to start a season - WhiteLie
It could also be a combination of trying to get players who are replacement level some ice time in the minors in order to have them ready for injuries. Let's not forget that in the first 3 months of the season alone, we have several long road trips back east that are prime candidates to play havoc with our opening night roster. If you're planning on making the playoffs then it just makes sense not to stuff your roster with talent and then waste the best talented of your AHL-level players in the press box when you can have them playing big minutes in the AHL and keep your AHL roster mostly competitive. Last year Utica got decimated by all the call-ups, keeping that to a manageable level will help the prospects and fringe players all get needed experience and improvement that might just make them that much better and able to keep spots in the NHL. |
|
|
|
I don't get all this commotion to protect players.
Vegas takes one player from the team not half the roster.
Grandlund, Dorsett Sutter that could be exposed if they had bad years . Hansen also .the obvious for me would be Dorsett. Having a guy like Burrows play out his last year is stupid. That spot could be used for a two year deal for Ruutu @ 1 mil per year and expose him.
Bachman will be the goalie exposed.
If you kept Biega or Sbisa and exposed one ( not two) then vegas would take one of our forwards anyways. Even Vegas would be smart enough to know don't take Sbisa.
Build a team to win and screw the expansion draft |
|
WhiteLie
Referee |
|
|
Location: When youre 7 pages behind Dont bother catching up, you will never get that time back - Codes1087 Joined: 07.26.2010
|
|
|
It could also be a combination of trying to get players who are replacement level some ice time in the minors in order to have them ready for injuries. Let's not forget that in the first 3 months of the season alone, we have several long road trips back east that are prime candidates to play havoc with our opening night roster. If you're planning on making the playoffs then it just makes sense not to stuff your roster with talent and then waste the best talented of your AHL-level players in the press box when you can have them playing big minutes in the AHL and keep your AHL roster mostly competitive. Last year Utica got decimated by all the call-ups, keeping that to a manageable level will help the prospects and fringe players all get needed experience and improvement that might just make them that much better and able to keep spots in the NHL. - DariusKnight
For sure, I posted earlier that I would rather Biega be the in the pressbox in the NHL and have Pedan playing in the AHL than vice versa. I just hope that this narrative regarding Biega's eligibility is a guess and not the true reason he is still on the roster |
|
WhiteLie
Referee |
|
|
Location: When youre 7 pages behind Dont bother catching up, you will never get that time back - Codes1087 Joined: 07.26.2010
|
|
|
I don't get all this commotion to protect players.
Vegas takes one player from the team not half the roster.
Grandlund, Dorsett Sutter that could be exposed if they had bad years . Hansen also .the obvious for me would be Dorsett. Having a guy like Burrows play out his last year is stupid. That spot could be used for a two year deal for Ruutu @ 1 mil per year and expose him.
Bachman will be the goalie exposed.
If you kept Biega or Sutter and exposed one ( not two) then vegas would take one of our forwards anyways. Even Vegas would be smart enough to know don't take Sbisa.
Build a team to win and screw the expansion draft - VANTEL
The only commotion is that there are requirements for who must be exposed, but Sbisa should easily play 30 games this year making it a null point. If Sbisa gets injured at any point for any length of time, then there would be plenty of time for Biega to get into 20 games before the season ends |
|
the end
|
|
Location: CA Joined: 02.02.2009
|
|
|
I don't get all this commotion to protect players.
Vegas takes one player from the team not half the roster.
Grandlund, Dorsett Sutter that could be exposed if they had bad years . Hansen also .the obvious for me would be Dorsett. Having a guy like Burrows play out his last year is stupid. That spot could be used for a two year deal for Ruutu @ 1 mil per year and expose him.
Bachman will be the goalie exposed.
If you kept Biega or Sbisa and exposed one ( not two) then vegas would take one of our forwards anyways. Even Vegas would be smart enough to know don't take Sbisa.
Build a team to win and screw the expansion draft - VANTEL
This 1000x's over ..... you only lose 1 player ..... plus by the way some are going on (1040 crew) you would think we will be losing the last piece to the puzzle for that future President Trophy team ... |
|