Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Michael Pachla: Some 2016-17 NHL predictions for the Buffalo Sabres
Author Message
jdfitz77
Buffalo Sabres
Location: buffalo, NY
Joined: 05.21.2007

Oct 10 @ 10:50 PM ET
i'm not a fan of giving out big contracts to players that play very good in the system they are in, he's a product of playing in Tampa IMO. There is a lot of talent there.
- SABRES 89



Ok, fair enough

I'd still be thrilled to get Kucherov,
But it's obviously super unlikely anyways
SABRES 89
Season Ticket Holder
Buffalo Sabres
Location: I'm very Happy to be here. Las Vegas Via Buffalo N.Y.
Joined: 02.17.2007

Oct 10 @ 11:06 PM ET
Me either. Check out my location 89.
- Pierceme69

Very nice, where you staying ?
SABRES 89
Season Ticket Holder
Buffalo Sabres
Location: I'm very Happy to be here. Las Vegas Via Buffalo N.Y.
Joined: 02.17.2007

Oct 10 @ 11:07 PM ET
Ok, fair enough

I'd still be thrilled to get Kucherov,
But it's obviously super unlikely anyways

- jdfitz77

Even if we got him and i'm sure we won't, we would probably only gain 1 point according to some writers.
Der Kaiser
Buffalo Sabres
Location: I Know Nothink ... NOTHINK!
Joined: 07.27.2007

Oct 10 @ 11:14 PM ET
I just hope there is going to be accountability IF this team finds itself at or near the bottom of the Atlantic this season.

Bylsma and Murray both seem to think this team has 95 point potential. While that is a stretch, a solid 85-90 points should be the goal and at the very least some meaningful hockey in February and March. I don't need this team to make the playoffs. Just be within a few points by mid March so the kids can get some experience playing under pressure in the home stretch.

Having said this, the pundits and so-called experts are calling for another long season for Buffalo. I can't blame them. We have two big question marks for goalies, not much depth on the blueline and are depending on too many has-beens and never-weres up front.

Should this team regress, I think the seat is going to get very warm for GMTM and Bylsma will be the scapegoat.

- Losman


Why are you preparing for failure?
jdfitz77
Buffalo Sabres
Location: buffalo, NY
Joined: 05.21.2007

Oct 10 @ 11:15 PM ET
Even if we got him and i'm sure we won't, we would probably only gain 1 point according to some writers.
- SABRES 89



Meh
I'm not concerned at all about the writers not giving us respect.
Even though I think we'll be better than they're all predicting...
It's not surprising to me at all.
We'll have to start winning if we wanna get respect
And if we still don't, then fine
We can play with that underdog chip on our shoulder
doppelthat
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Tampa, FL
Joined: 07.07.2012

Oct 10 @ 11:36 PM ET
I guess someone had to win that Monday Night football game.
Wetbandit1
Vegas Golden Knights
Location: Hail Satan
Joined: 10.07.2010

Oct 10 @ 11:43 PM ET
Risto should've been signed months ago
Obviously we still need to get him signed asap
And if Kucherov is a possibility...
u make the Cap room
Trade a couple guys for scraps if that's what u have to do
Not that complicated

- jdfitz77


Yeah, but he's not the only one. There are guys as/if not more important to their teams that have yet to sign, and Gaudreau just signed today.
feetontheair22
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Tampa doesn't suck, FL
Joined: 02.01.2011

Oct 10 @ 11:45 PM ET
We are going to finish 8th in the conference and make the playoffs.

Risto will solidify his position as the #1D.

Eichel and Reinhart will shine.

Ennis and Kane will have bounce-back seasons.

Lehner will prove he is a #1 Goalie.

And for (frank)s sake we will finish above the (frank)in leafs.

Now lets play some (frank)ing hockey!
Wetbandit1
Vegas Golden Knights
Location: Hail Satan
Joined: 10.07.2010

Oct 10 @ 11:48 PM ET
I just hope there is going to be accountability IF this team finds itself at or near the bottom of the Atlantic this season.

Bylsma and Murray both seem to think this team has 95 point potential. While that is a stretch, a solid 85-90 points should be the goal and at the very least some meaningful hockey in February and March. I don't need this team to make the playoffs. Just be within a few points by mid March so the kids can get some experience playing under pressure in the home stretch.

Having said this, the pundits and so-called experts are calling for another long season for Buffalo. I can't blame them. We have two big question marks for goalies, not much depth on the blueline and are depending on too many has-beens and never-weres up front.

Should this team regress, I think the seat is going to get very warm for GMTM and Bylsma will be the scapegoat.

- Losman


They're saying that because their algorithms are very flawed and don't take into account young players and tanking. 2 things the Sabres have in spades the last 3 years which is the basis of many of these "predictions".
Wetbandit1
Vegas Golden Knights
Location: Hail Satan
Joined: 10.07.2010

Oct 10 @ 11:54 PM ET
We are going to finish 8th in the conference and make the playoffs.

Risto will solidify his position as the #1D.

Eichel and Reinhart will shine.

Ennis and Kane will have bounce-back seasons.

Lehner will prove he is a #1 Goalie.

And for (frank)s sake we will finish above the (frank)in leafs.

Now lets play some (frank)ing hockey!

- feetontheair22


This one still gets me. He was coming off of major surgery, to a new town, new teammates, new coaches.

All in all he had a good season. Was it spectacular? Obviously not, but he put in 20 goals in 65 games, and when he finally started passing the puck his assist numbers started creeping up. Is there more room for improvement? Absolutely, but to say he had a bad season is ignoring a lot of variables that had a significant impact upon his season.
Wetbandit1
Vegas Golden Knights
Location: Hail Satan
Joined: 10.07.2010

Oct 10 @ 11:56 PM ET
I guess someone had to win that Monday Night football game.
- doppelthat


Wow Greg Olsen had himself a game. 9 for 181 and his long was only 34.
doppelthat
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Tampa, FL
Joined: 07.07.2012

Oct 11 @ 12:09 AM ET
Wow Greg Olsen had himself a game. 9 for 181 and his long was only 34.
- Wetbandit1


Yes, Olsen knows how to football, the Bucs secondary, outside of Grimes, does not know how to football.
Wetbandit1
Vegas Golden Knights
Location: Hail Satan
Joined: 10.07.2010

Oct 11 @ 12:10 AM ET
I just did a 20 team, yes 20 teams! draft. I inherited the worst team from last year. Rounds 11-17(underlined) were the keepers from last years team He had to put them there because there were draft pick trades from last year I guess. Had to keep 6 skaters and 1 goalie. I had 1st pick, snake draft. I could've had Price, but I figured keeping Matthews for as long as I'm in the league seemed a better move. I'm not expecting much this year as I've never done more than a 12 team league before. Roster is as follows 4C 3LW 3RW 6D 2F 2G 2BN:

1. (1) Auston Matthews C
2. (40) Kyle Turris C
3. (41) Rickard Rakell C
4. (80) Cam Ward G
5. (81) Morgan Rielly D
6. (120) Oscar Klefbom D
7. (121) Tyler Ennis C,LW
8. (160) Mike Fisher C
9. (161) Tyler Myers D
10. (200) Jannik Hansen RW
11. (201) Phil Kessel RW
12. (240) Brad Marchand LW
13. (241) Zach Parise LW
14. (280) Tyson Barrie D
15. (281) Jordan Eberle RW
16. (320) Mike Hoffman LW
17. (321) Brian Elliott G

18. (360) Michael Frolik C,RW
19. (361) Alexander Nylander LW
20. (400) Justin Braun D
21. (401) Shea Theodore D
22. (440) Jake McCabe D
23. (441) Brett Connolly RW
24. (480) Christopher Tanev D
25. (481) Hudson Fasching RW
26. (520) Andreas Athanasiou C
sbroads24
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We are in 30th place. It's 2017 , NY
Joined: 02.12.2012

Oct 11 @ 12:12 AM ET
This one still gets me. He was coming off of major surgery, to a new town, new teammates, new coaches.

All in all he had a good season. Was it spectacular? Obviously not, but he put in 20 goals in 65 games, and when he finally started passing the puck his assist numbers started creeping up. Is there more room for improvement? Absolutely, but to say he had a bad season is ignoring a lot of variables that had a significant impact upon his season.

- Wetbandit1

No, he had a bad season. I'm not sure how it can be spun any other way. He had a handful of solid games, and is a positive player on the PK and in terms of posession.

But he scored like a 3rd liner, and was played like a 1st liner. And that's just on the ice.

I'm expecting a good year from him. It's a career saving year
jdfitz77
Buffalo Sabres
Location: buffalo, NY
Joined: 05.21.2007

Oct 11 @ 12:21 AM ET
Yeah, but he's not the only one. There are guys as/if not more important to their teams that have yet to sign, and Gaudreau just signed today.
- Wetbandit1



There's also plenty of guys that signed a while ago
Maybe my perception is off,
But it doesn't seem that Murray has any sense of urgency with these kinda thimgs
jdfitz77
Buffalo Sabres
Location: buffalo, NY
Joined: 05.21.2007

Oct 11 @ 12:23 AM ET
We are going to finish 8th in the conference and make the playoffs.

Risto will solidify his position as the #1D.

Eichel and Reinhart will shine.

Ennis and Kane will have bounce-back seasons.

Lehner will prove he is a #1 Goalie.

And for (frank)s sake we will finish above the (frank)in leafs.

Now lets play some (frank)ing hockey!

- feetontheair22



Love the optimism!
However...
If any of those things don't work out, we could very well miss
I like the direction we're headed though!
Wetbandit1
Vegas Golden Knights
Location: Hail Satan
Joined: 10.07.2010

Oct 11 @ 12:30 AM ET
There's also plenty of guys that signed a while ago
Maybe my perception is off,
But it doesn't seem that Murray has any sense of urgency with these kinda thimgs

- jdfitz77


He's not going to come out in public and say he's panicking. That would be dumb.

I'm definitely concerned at this point as to what the holdup is, but I'm still confident he can come and step right in when he does sign. He's practicing with the team, he knows the system.

This was an odd year because of the World Cup. I think there was some sort of unofficial moratorium on moves of that magnitude. Because of the amount of guys that are/were unsigned through the WCH. What with a lot of teams missing key guys from the front office.
homiedclown
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We want 1, FL
Joined: 02.24.2008

Oct 11 @ 12:45 AM ET
Swept no less. If there is any sports god the Indians and Cubs will play in the WS.
- Pierceme69

jays and cubs

jays in 6
homiedclown
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We want 1, FL
Joined: 02.24.2008

Oct 11 @ 12:45 AM ET
I can't stand anything Boston
- SABRES 89

f@ck brad park
jdfitz77
Buffalo Sabres
Location: buffalo, NY
Joined: 05.21.2007

Oct 11 @ 12:46 AM ET
He's not going to come out in public and say he's panicking. That would be dumb.

I'm definitely concerned at this point as to what the holdup is, but I'm still confident he can come and step right in when he does sign. He's practicing with the team, he knows the system.

This was an odd year because of the World Cup. I think there was some sort of unofficial moratorium on moves of that magnitude. Because of the amount of guys that are/were unsigned through the WCH. What with a lot of teams missing key guys from the front office.

- Wetbandit1




What I meant was...
guys like Reilly, Jones, etc were being extended or signed
And when murray would get asked about it (early in the off season), he was just very aloof & would say stuff like:
"We've been in contact, but have talked numbers"
"We'll get in touch with them next week"
"No, we haven't talked yet, but we will be"

Stuff like that
It just appears that he gets around to contract talk when he gets around to it

I'd like to see that attitude change

Guys should be getting signed/extended much sooner imo
And before u say that's not beneficial to the player...
I'd say Girgensons wishes he extended after last season instead of waiting until after this past subpar year. He lost LOTS of $$$


homiedclown
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We want 1, FL
Joined: 02.24.2008

Oct 11 @ 12:48 AM ET
Love the optimism!
However...
If any of those things don't work out, we could very well miss
I like the direction we're headed though!

- jdfitz77

if this team is a bottom 8 team again, murray needs to be shown the door
jdfitz77
Buffalo Sabres
Location: buffalo, NY
Joined: 05.21.2007

Oct 11 @ 1:16 AM ET
if this team is a bottom 8 team again, murray needs to be shown the door
- homiedclown




The only was I see us "bottom 8" is of goaltending doesn't work out
I do think it's our biggest question mark though
And if the backup has to play significant time & doesn't perform,
Murray will have to own up to not bringing in someone w a better track record
Wetbandit1
Vegas Golden Knights
Location: Hail Satan
Joined: 10.07.2010

Oct 11 @ 2:21 AM ET
What I meant was...
guys like Reilly, Jones, etc were being extended or signed
And when murray would get asked about it (early in the off season), he was just very aloof & would say stuff like:
"We've been in contact, but have talked numbers"
"We'll get in touch with them next week"
"No, we haven't talked yet, but we will be"

Stuff like that
It just appears that he gets around to contract talk when he gets around to it

I'd like to see that attitude change

Guys should be getting signed/extended much sooner imo
And before u say that's not beneficial to the player...
I'd say Girgensons wishes he extended after last season instead of waiting until after this past subpar year. He lost LOTS of $$$

- jdfitz77


It's only worth it for both team and player to sign early when the player is established, like with Kane and Toews. Look at how Stamkos almost turned out. You don't think Yzerman wasn't poopting a brick daily? But we'd all be calling for Murray's head if Girgensons signed last year, because he'd likely get $4M. It's just bad business to sign earlier than you have to. You're not going to go up to your boss and say "hey, I know my contract isn't up for another year yet, and I'm still learning the ropes, but I want a massive raise and I want it in writing now." You'd likely get laughed out of the office.

There's a middle ground too though. You can start negotiating a week to 10 days after the season is over once you get done with all the interviews and needs/wants. and have it done before or just after free agency starts. But then none od this happens in a vacuum either. No one wants to be the first signed and leave money on the table. That and the WCH is how we're the day before the season and Kucherov, Trouba, Lindholm, Risto, etc remained to be signed and Gaudreau signed 2 days before the season started.
jdfitz77
Buffalo Sabres
Location: buffalo, NY
Joined: 05.21.2007

Oct 11 @ 5:45 AM ET
It's only worth it for both team and player to sign early when the player is established, like with Kane and Toews. Look at how Stamkos almost turned out. You don't think Yzerman wasn't poopting a brick daily? But we'd all be calling for Murray's head if Girgensons signed last year, because he'd likely get $4M. It's just bad business to sign earlier than you have to. You're not going to go up to your boss and say "hey, I know my contract isn't up for another year yet, and I'm still learning the ropes, but I want a massive raise and I want it in writing now." You'd likely get laughed out of the office.

There's a middle ground too though. You can start negotiating a week to 10 days after the season is over once you get done with all the interviews and needs/wants. and have it done before or just after free agency starts. But then none od this happens in a vacuum either. No one wants to be the first signed and leave money on the table. That and the WCH is how we're the day before the season and Kucherov, Trouba, Lindholm, Risto, etc remained to be signed and Gaudreau signed 2 days before the season started.

- Wetbandit1




Disagree with almost all of this
But I don't have the energy to argue back n forth



feetontheair22
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Tampa doesn't suck, FL
Joined: 02.01.2011

Oct 11 @ 7:12 AM ET
This one still gets me. He was coming off of major surgery, to a new town, new teammates, new coaches.

All in all he had a good season. Was it spectacular? Obviously not, but he put in 20 goals in 65 games, and when he finally started passing the puck his assist numbers started creeping up. Is there more room for improvement? Absolutely, but to say he had a bad season is ignoring a lot of variables that had a significant impact upon his season.

- Wetbandit1


When I wrote that one I kind of hesitated, but like sbroads said, Kane's ceiling is very high. The kid has tremendous potential. I can't help but wonder if the extra-curricular activities inhibit his focus in reaching that potential.

So when I say bounce back, do I think he'll pot 40? No. Do I think he'll finally put his nightclub demons behind him and get focused back on heading toward being a 40 goal scorer? Yes.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22  Next