Anyone who is defending Khadr, for whatever reason, must have similar Jihadist beliefs.
Why did your boy tru-D'Oh! not just set up a GoFundMe page for Khadr so that you, and other Jidaists could donate your own after tax money to him ........... instead of giving him, and his family, 10 plus million taxdollars.
You, and your fellow Khadr lovers, must be celebrating that a liberal Ontario judge denied the injunction Sgt Speer's Widow filed, in an attempt to put a hold on the tax payer bonanza tru-D'Oh! gave to Khadr. His lawyers now have more time to shelter the money, and hide where it is, where it has already been sent.
Perhaps he is aiding his Sister, Zaynab Khadr who moved to Turkey a number of years ago, when she was under investigation by the RCMP for terror-related offences, and needs the money to carry on the family tradition of milking Canada of as much "free" tax payers money, so they can to advance their Jihadist goals.
She said at the time that she "would rather raise her children to fight than live in Canada, where they could become homosexuals or addicted to drugs".
I guess you support “Canadians of convenience” like the Kahdr family.
Location: I'll always remember the last words my grandfather ever told me. He said, "A Truck!", SK Joined: 09.21.2009
Jul 14 @ 9:04 AM ET
So you're sticking up for an admitted Jihadist, who made and planted road side bombs that killed American and Canadian soldiers .............. are you also a Jihadist? - D0PPELGANGER
You can't have it both ways, dippoop.
You can't blame the guy for leaving the country for Pakistan, and then agree that he had no choice in the matter because he was a child.
Also, are you calling the Supreme Court jihadists? Or UNICEF? Or the UN, who determined that one of the several tribunals Khadr faced while in Gitmo violated the goddamn Geneva Convention?
You can't blame the guy for leaving the country for Pakistan, and then agree that he had no choice in the matter because he was a child.
Also, are you calling the Supreme Court jihadists? Or UNICEF? Or the UN, who determined that one of the several tribunals Khadr faced while in Gitmo violated the goddamn Geneva Convention? - BINGO!
Geneva convention doesn't matter when we're talking Muslims.
Location: long friend time friend, AB Joined: 11.26.2008
Jul 14 @ 9:10 AM ET
You can't have it both ways, dippoop.
You can't blame the guy for leaving the country for Pakistan, and then agree that he had no choice in the matter because he was a child.
Also, are you calling the Supreme Court jihadists? Or UNICEF? Or the UN, who determined that one of the several tribunals Khadr faced while in Gitmo violated the goddamn Geneva Convention? - BINGO!
Omar and his fam are deff a pooppile but from a legal standpoint, the government screwed the pooch the whole way.
No point wasting another $100m more screwing it to death.
You can't blame the guy for leaving the country for Pakistan, and then agree that he had no choice in the matter because he was a child.
Also, are you calling the Supreme Court jihadists? Or UNICEF? Or the UN, who determined that one of the several tribunals Khadr faced while in Gitmo violated the goddamn Geneva Convention? - BINGO!
I'm glad you brought up the Geneva Convention Protocols, because Khadr was NOT, under the GCPs, "a child soldier".
First of all, he was not "forcibly recruited" by a "Nation state" or an "army" by any definition you'd care to use ......... he, and all of his older siblings willingly joined Al Qadia, a UN recognized terrorist organization (does 9 11 ring a bell ?)
Khadr was almost 16 years old when he was captured, after Killing Sgt Speer, and wounding other American Soldiers, and did not meet the GCPs of being a "child Soldier" ........... BUT you probably think he was, because the Left Wing Progressive Liberal Main Stream Media have been falsely defining him as a "Child Soldier" ...... and you just thought "the Left Wing Progressive Liberal Main Stream Media wouldn't lie, would they?"
So, he was not in an army, not a soldier.................... but just for the sake of it lets say he joined an army, and was a uniformed soldier ........ well he still would not have been a "child soldier" as he was over the age of 15, and was almost 16, and would not have been defined as a "child soldier" as per the definition in the GCPs
“Children who have not attained the age of fifteen years shall neither be recruited in the armed forces or groups nor allowed to take part in hostilities.”
Location: Dude, I am so sorry about whatever made you like this. Take it easy. Joined: 07.06.2007
Jul 14 @ 9:40 AM ET
Well the answer to that question is that the overwhelming majority of homeless people suffer from serious mental health issues and are incapable of working either due to the illness itself, the medication they take or a combination of both. For example my uncle suffers from paranoid schizophrenia and his medication causes him to sleep between 12-14 hours per day. Even if the medication were enough for him to be coherent, which it isn't, he wouldn't have enough hours left in the day to reasonably be expected to work a job with which to support himself.
My uncle got lucky as my grandparents were well off and left him with enough money to buy a small condo and pay for his basic needs, most people are not so lucky and end up homeless. The reason we have homeless people is that we do not provide the support needed to the people who need it and we don't provide this support because it brings in far too few votes for the money investments needed.
So next time you see this Catherine, instead of filling her head with misguided ideals such as homeless people being lazy, please inform her that the best way to help the homeless is to provide them with the social, mental as well as financial help they need. Doing so will not only help these people find homes but also make it possible for people with light to moderate illnesses to become productive members of society. - Monkey
I'm glad you brought up the Geneva Convention Protocols, because Khadr was NOT, under the GCPs, "a child soldier".
First of all, he was not "forcibly recruited" by a "Nation state" or an "army" by any definition you'd care to use ......... he, and all of his older siblings willingly joined Al Qadia, a UN recognized terrorist organization (does 9 11 ring a bell ?)
Khadr was almost 16 years old when he was captured, after Killing Sgt Speer, and wounding other American Soldiers, and did not meet the GCPs of being a "child Soldier" ........... BUT you probably think he was, because the Left Wing Progressive Liberal Main Stream Media have been falsely defining him as a "Child Soldier" ...... and you just thought "the Left Wing Progressive Liberal Main Stream Media wouldn't lie, would they?"
So, he was not in an army, not a soldier.................... but just for the sake of it lets say he joined an army, and was a uniformed soldier ........ well he still would not have been a "child soldier" as he was over the age of 15, and was almost 16, and would not have been defined as a "child soldier" as per the definition in the GCPs
“Children who have not attained the age of fifteen years shall neither be recruited in the armed forces or groups nor allowed to take part in hostilities.” - D0PPELGANGER
I'm glad you're such a scholar of the Geneva conventions! Surely you know this part:
The following acts are and shall remain prohibited at any time and in any place whatsoever with respect to the above-mentioned persons:
-violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture;
-taking of hostages;
-outrages upon dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment; and
-the passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions without previous judgment pronounced by a regularly constituted court, affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples.
The wounded and sick shall be collected and cared for.
Location: I'll always remember the last words my grandfather ever told me. He said, "A Truck!", SK Joined: 09.21.2009
Jul 14 @ 10:11 AM ET
I'm glad you brought up the Geneva Convention Protocols, because Khadr was NOT, under the GCPs, "a child soldier".
First of all, he was not "forcibly recruited" by a "Nation state" or an "army" by any definition you'd care to use ......... he, and all of his older siblings willingly joined Al Qadia, a UN recognized terrorist organization (does 9 11 ring a bell ?)
Khadr was almost 16 years old when he was captured, after Killing Sgt Speer, and wounding other American Soldiers, and did not meet the GCPs of being a "child Soldier" ........... BUT you probably think he was, because the Left Wing Progressive Liberal Main Stream Media have been falsely defining him as a "Child Soldier" ...... and you just thought "the Left Wing Progressive Liberal Main Stream Media wouldn't lie, would they?"
So, he was not in an army, not a soldier.................... but just for the sake of it lets say he joined an army, and was a uniformed soldier ........ well he still would not have been a "child soldier" as he was over the age of 15, and was almost 16, and would not have been defined as a "child soldier" as per the definition in the GCPs
“Children who have not attained the age of fifteen years shall neither be recruited in the armed forces or groups nor allowed to take part in hostilities.” - D0PPELGANGER
If Omar Khadr had thrown that grenade into somebody's car in downtown Toronto, he wouldn't have a criminal record today and nobody would know his name.
Location: I'll always remember the last words my grandfather ever told me. He said, "A Truck!", SK Joined: 09.21.2009
Jul 14 @ 10:12 AM ET
I'm glad you brought up the Geneva Convention Protocols, because Khadr was NOT, under the GCPs, "a child soldier".
First of all, he was not "forcibly recruited" by a "Nation state" or an "army" by any definition you'd care to use ......... he, and all of his older siblings willingly joined Al Qadia, a UN recognized terrorist organization (does 9 11 ring a bell ?)
Khadr was almost 16 years old when he was captured, after Killing Sgt Speer, and wounding other American Soldiers, and did not meet the GCPs of being a "child Soldier" ........... BUT you probably think he was, because the Left Wing Progressive Liberal Main Stream Media have been falsely defining him as a "Child Soldier" ...... and you just thought "the Left Wing Progressive Liberal Main Stream Media wouldn't lie, would they?"
So, he was not in an army, not a soldier.................... but just for the sake of it lets say he joined an army, and was a uniformed soldier ........ well he still would not have been a "child soldier" as he was over the age of 15, and was almost 16, and would not have been defined as a "child soldier" as per the definition in the GCPs
“Children who have not attained the age of fifteen years shall neither be recruited in the armed forces or groups nor allowed to take part in hostilities.” - D0PPELGANGER
Also, I didn't say anything about him being a "Child Soldier" you colossal (frank)wit.
are they raising money for the Speer family?
