It's technically only his 2nd. He slid twice.
- Wetbandit1

Third according to this. I think its just about years played.

http://www.hockeydb.com/i...s/pdisplay.php?pid=129676

Bc u aren't explaining yourself


You said they aren't taking our garbage
I'm saying, they kind of are going to have to
They aren't gonna get someone good from us!
- jdfitz77

I am explaining myself, everyone thinks we can pawn off our trash on Vegas because " they have to take them" they don't, there will be better players to take. We won't get off the hook that easily.

Ever been to SW steakhouse at The Wynn? How is it if so?
- soljor09

No sir I have not, I don't go near the strip when i'm not working.

Third according to this. I think its just about years played.

http://www.hockeydb.com/i...s/pdisplay.php?pid=129676
- Sabresfan-365

Weird. Capfriendly has him as a slide twice and this being the 2nd year of his ELC:

https://www.capfriendly.c...m/players/william-carrier

They're exposing Nilsson. Ullmark is exempt.
- Wetbandit1

Nilsson won't be here to expose unless we re-sign him (UFA). But you can only protect one goalie (Lehner) and Ullmark looks to be eligible

Leafs make it look so easy and we struggle to score a goal smh

I am explaining myself, everyone thinks we can pawn off our trash on Vegas because " they have to take them" they don't, there will be better players to take. We won't get off the hook that easily.
- SABRES 89

Not really...
you're still being vague
Who do u think is gonna be available from us?

We get to protect 3 defensemen, & they can't take Kulikov bc he's UFA
And we essentially get to protect 9 forwards, bc Reinhart & Eichel are exempt


Their best bet looks to be either Gorges or Moulson
Unless u think those guys will be protected & someone else will be exposed

Nilsson won't be here to expose unless we re-sign him (UFA). But you can only protect one goalie (Lehner) and Ullmark looks to be eligible
- chilliard77

Either way, not the end of the world if we lose him. There will be far better goalies to take though. MAF, Bishop, Neuvirth/Mason...

Nilsson won't be here to expose unless we re-sign him (UFA). But you can only protect one goalie (Lehner) and Ullmark looks to be eligible
- chilliard77

I think that this is only Reinhart's 2nd year in the AHL,
So he should be exempt...

But even if he's not,
There's much better choices out there
I'd be very surprised if he's taken from us

Either way, not the end of the world if we lose him. There will be far better goalies to take though. MAF, Bishop, Neuvirth/Mason...
- Wetbandit1

Bishop is a UFA. So are Mason/Neuvirth

Either way, not the end of the world if we lose him. There will be far better goalies to take though. MAF, Bishop, Neuvirth/Mason...
- Wetbandit1

If they wanna choose a young goalie...
my guess would be Subban from Boston
There's other options out there too

Either way, not the end of the world if we lose him. There will be far better goalies to take though. MAF, Bishop, Neuvirth/Mason...
- Wetbandit1

Bishop, Neuvirth, and Mason are all UFA. MAF has a NMC. But there will be solid goalies available. Macolm Subban, Matt Murray (if they don't trade one of them), Calvin Pickard, one of Reimer/Luongo, etc

Bishop is a UFA. So are Mason/Neuvirth
- sbroads24

Remind me again why we needed Lehner.....

Remind me again why we needed Lehner.....
- sbroads24

Because Murray scouted him in Ottawa.

Bishop is a UFA. So are Mason/Neuvirth
- sbroads24

Vegas can still take them/sign them.

Remind me again why we needed Lehner.....
- sbroads24

I certainly don't want Mason or Neuvirth as our starter
Bishop, ok...
but he's older & idk if u wanna give him the long term deal he'd demand
And that IF he'd even sign here

I think a 1st for Lehner was too much,
But I'm not unhappy with his play
.920 save% is petty good imo

Vegas can still take them/sign them.
- Wetbandit1

They can potentially sign UFAs,
But they can't actually "select" any of them

Remind me again why we needed Lehner.....
- sbroads24

I might protect ullmark over lehner

They can potentially sign UFAs,
But they can't actually "select" any of them
- jdfitz77

They can trade for them.

I might protect ullmark over lehner
- homiedclown

11 games tomorrow to get 79.5 points to get to my goal of 600 for the week. Possible. Especially when I have the likes of Marchand, Laine, McDavid, Kucherov, Gostisbehere, and Karlsson.

They can trade for them.
- Wetbandit1

I guess...
but it seems unlikely
They're getting 30 players in the expansion draft,
And there's plenty of goalies for them to just choose

Saw that new sing movie it was really good

Definitely should take your kids

Not really...
you're still being vague
Who do u think is gonna be available from us?

We get to protect 3 defensemen, & they can't take Kulikov bc he's UFA
And we essentially get to protect 9 forwards, bc Reinhart & Eichel are exempt


Their best bet looks to be either Gorges or Moulson
Unless u think those guys will be protected & someone else will be exposed
- jdfitz77

No i'm not my point is, everytime you read a post on this blog people think we can pawn off Moulson, Kane, Gorges, Bogo ETC on Vegas. I have no clue who they will protect or want to move.

No i'm not my point is, everytime you read a post on this blog people think we can pawn off Moulson, Kane, Gorges, Bogo ETC on Vegas. I have no clue who they will protect or want to move.
- SABRES 89

We we get to protect so many guys that they really aren't gonna be left with much of a choice

Right now,
Looks like their best options could actually be Moulson or Gorges

Take a minute & select who you'd protect
Reinhart & Eichel are exempt
Pick 7 more forwards we can protect
Then choose any 3 defensemen to protect
Kulikov will be UFA, so they can't pick him & we don't have to protect him