|
|
But you don't like anyone on Canucks so I will take that as a meh - VANTEL
I like Bo, demko, Hutton and stecher |
|
Tumbleweed
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: avid reader of the daily douche news Joined: 03.14.2014
|
|
|
Horvat. - thundachunk
Well. A 2nd line center is one piece you need for a cup run.
Good for you guys |
|
LeftCoaster
Anaheim Ducks |
|
|
Location: Duck City, CA Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
Vrbata Prust Higgins Burrows is that don't spell Stanley Cup , nothing will - VANTEL
You're good at changing the subject
The fact remains they only started tanking a couple of years ago. In 2014 they had a sell-off of players to bottom out, up until then they were a decent team.
In 2011 they had a 96 point playoff team, 2012 they just missed the playoff with an 89 point team, it's not like they've been rebuilding for ten years. |
|
|
|
Well. A 2nd line center is one piece you need for a cup run.
Good for you guys - Tumbleweed
You do know your team stinks too right? Christ some of you guys are idiots |
|
Tumbleweed
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: avid reader of the daily douche news Joined: 03.14.2014
|
|
|
Horvat has three points less than HHOF Mathews - VANTEL
Agreed
3rd year pro already getting outscored by our rookies. |
|
|
|
Well. A 2nd line center is one piece you need for a cup run.
Good for you guys - Tumbleweed
He plays on the 3rd line a$$hat. |
|
ClarksonDavid
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: Rielly wouldn't, crack top 4 on the sens team -PtotheY, SK Joined: 03.15.2014
|
|
|
Horvat has three points less than HHOF Mathews - VANTEL
You'd take Matthews over Horvat and you know it |
|
|
|
You're good at changing the subject
The fact remains they only started tanking a couple of years ago. In 2014 they had a sell-off of players to bottom out, up until then they were a decent team.
In 2011 they had a 96 point playoff team, 2012 they just missed the playoff with an 89 point team, it's not like they've been rebuilding for ten years. - LeftCoaster
You said they finished ahead of us with a younger lineup. He is a list of some of our older players on the roster. How is that changing the subject? |
|
Tumbleweed
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: avid reader of the daily douche news Joined: 03.14.2014
|
|
|
He plays on the 3rd line a$$hat. - thundachunk
Future 2nd line center |
|
|
|
You'd take Matthews over Horvat and you know it - ClarksonDavid
No I would have taken Laine over Horvat. You guys may love Mathews but he wasn't even my first choice last year . |
|
|
|
No I would have taken Laine over Horvat. You guys may love Mathews but he wasn't even my first choice last year . - VANTEL
Nor mine. |
|
Tumbleweed
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: avid reader of the daily douche news Joined: 03.14.2014
|
|
|
They spent an entire season trying to be bad ...not trying to win a game ...just like the leafs
Only difference is they missed out on mcdavid
Guess the leafs missed out on Laine tho - Redmile247
I'm not complaining about the tank.
After so many wasted seasons, it good to be the team to get something for it for a change. |
|
LeftCoaster
Anaheim Ducks |
|
|
Location: Duck City, CA Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
You said they finished ahead of us with a younger lineup. He is a list of some of our older players on the roster. How is that changing the subject? - VANTEL
You said they're terrible and yet they only started rebuilding a few years ago then you give excuses why they finished better than the Canucks.
Perhaps they're not very good because they're in year three of an actual rebuild? |
|
|
|
Agreed
3rd year pro already getting outscored by our Demigod. - Tumbleweed
How many times did Mathews take a sh!t yesterday. You guys are clowns
|
|
|
|
I'm not complaining about the tank.
After so many wasted seasons, it good to be the team to get something for it for a change. - Tumbleweed
No I agree ...just giving you a hard time
Think of it as paying my rent to father vantel to be in here
Although with guys like Nuck4U in here there could be some vacancy |
|
ClarksonDavid
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: Rielly wouldn't, crack top 4 on the sens team -PtotheY, SK Joined: 03.15.2014
|
|
|
No I would have taken Laine over Horvat. You guys may love Mathews but he wasn't even my first choice last year . - VANTEL
You wouldn't take Horvat over Matthews. If you say otherwise your lying, I always love how people try to make it like leafs are (frank)ed cause they have Matthews! Damn.. leafs have Matthews.. you've probably seen him play twice I bet |
|
|
|
You wouldn't take Horvat over Matthews. If you say otherwise your lying, I always love how people try to make it like leafs are (frank)ed cause they have Matthews! Damn.. leafs have Matthews.. you've probably seen him play twice I bet - ClarksonDavid
I would have taken Mathews over Horvat. I would have taken Laine over Mathews though. |
|
|
|
You said they're terrible and yet they only started rebuilding a few years ago then you give excuses why they finished better than the Canucks.
Perhaps they're not very good because they're in year three of an actual rebuild? - LeftCoaster
Terrible /not very good Tomato /Tomato . 28 th spot is 28 th spot |
|
LeftCoaster
Anaheim Ducks |
|
|
Location: Duck City, CA Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
Terrible /not very good Tomato /Tomato . 28 th spot is 28 th spot - VANTEL
But there's a reason for it....which seems to be lost on you? The Canucks aren't very good because their management and coaching stink, the Sabres aren't very good because they've committed to an actual rebuild....do you see the difference there? |
|
|
|
But there's a reason for it....which seems to be lost on you? The Canucks aren't very good because their management and coaching stink, the Sabres aren't very good because they've committed to an actual rebuild....do you see the difference there? - LeftCoaster
Our management is fine. |
|
|
|
You wouldn't take Horvat over Matthews. If you say otherwise your lying, I always love how people try to make it like leafs are (frank)ed cause they have Matthews! Damn.. leafs have Matthews.. you've probably seen him play twice I bet - ClarksonDavid
I guess it i no different than us looking at you guys and laughing at you for thinking all the problems are solved now that you have AM.
Anyways I don't give a crap about your team and I sure as hell don't want to talk all day about you losers so how bout going back to your own thread. I am sure their is enough people over there to high five over job done |
|
hillbillydeluxe
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: I didn't read it , BC Joined: 09.21.2013
|
|
|
But there's a reason for it....which seems to be lost on you? The Canucks aren't very good because their management and coaching stink, the Sabres aren't very good because they've committed to an actual rebuild....do you see the difference there? - LeftCoaster
|
|
LeftCoaster
Anaheim Ducks |
|
|
Location: Duck City, CA Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
Our management is fine. - thundachunk
Well, I was thinking of the Gillis and Benning years collectively, but I still disagree, our management isn't "fine". |
|
Tumbleweed
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: avid reader of the daily douche news Joined: 03.14.2014
|
|
|
How many times did Mathews take a sh!t yesterday. You guys are clowns - VANTEL
You seem rattled.
Maybe you should have a snickers |
|
|
|
Our management is fine. - thundachunk
Not as bad as the media portrays
Not as good as most canuck fans would like
Give him time |
|