Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Carol Schram: Vancouver Canucks winning, make no headway in standings as road trip begins
Author Message
neem55
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 02.02.2012

Dec 5 @ 5:08 PM ET
Last year there were 7 teams below that mark
- NorthNuck


That's about what I expected, this is what I expect from a team that has playoff ambitions despite not having a playoff roster. But I can still hope #top5pick
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Dec 5 @ 5:12 PM ET
That's about what I expected, this is what I expect from a team that has playoff ambitions despite not having a playoff roster. But I can still hope #top5pick
- neem55

Top 10 is still pretty decent IMO.
belcherbd
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Nanaimo
Joined: 02.16.2007

Dec 5 @ 5:12 PM ET
At this point it really seems like we're gonna finish is that poopty 8-12 range. My hope then would be that JB could pay our first + Hansen or whatever we can afford to move into the top 5

Unless he could acquire a low first in addition to the one we already have, I'd be okay with that too.

- NorthNuck


I think if we can get a top 5 pick out of the lottery or because we are a bottom 5 team great, but if you are going to start moving Hansen and other players I want additional high picks not a slightly better position.

I like Benning's chances of getting a couple of good players at 8 and 29 or 8 and 35 etc than moving a down 3 spots to get a possibly superior player.
NorthNuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Yellowknife, NWT
Joined: 05.30.2016

Dec 5 @ 5:14 PM ET
Top 10 is still pretty decent IMO.
- Marwood

I know many want to land one of very top picks but if we end up in the expected range I would say volume of 1st, 2nd, 3rd rounders would be more important. Make a trade or 2 and give JB a chance to do what he's best at.
neem55
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 02.02.2012

Dec 5 @ 5:14 PM ET
Top 10 is still pretty decent IMO.
- Marwood

It's pretty descent, for sure. I think we both know which I'd prefer and why. If you look at the top-10 over the last decade and the top-5, there is a pretty significant difference between 1-5 and 6-10.
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks
Location: A dose of reality in this cesspool of glee
Joined: 10.22.2011

Dec 5 @ 5:19 PM ET
I completely agree.

Sedin - Sedin - Eriksson
Granlund - Sutter - Chaput (Hansen when back).
Baertschi - Horvat - Burrows
Megna - Burrows - Labate (skille ugh...)

Hutton - Gudbranson
Sbisa - Stecher
Tryamkin - Biega (Larsen is stool)

- Codes1087


Kind of like rearranging the deck chairs on the titanic is it not?
neem55
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 02.02.2012

Dec 5 @ 5:21 PM ET
I know many want to land one of very top picks but if we end up in the expected range I would say volume of 1st, 2nd, 3rd rounders would be more important. Make a trade or 2 and give JB a chance to do what he's best at.
- NorthNuck



This. All day, this year and next. This.
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks
Location: A dose of reality in this cesspool of glee
Joined: 10.22.2011

Dec 5 @ 5:24 PM ET
In that time, they're a respectable 7-4-1 but have made only slight gains in the standings—they start the week 26th overall.

Hey that's really awesome, you know 26 is BETTER than 28..

- Makita


Not from a draft perspective. What are they trying to achieve here?

This season's about draft picks and trading veterans. When do people start seriously talking about what's available to the canucks at this draft?

I'm surprised that we are still talking about line combinations. Why does it matter? This is our lost season...
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks
Location: A dose of reality in this cesspool of glee
Joined: 10.22.2011

Dec 5 @ 5:27 PM ET
I know many want to land one of very top picks but if we end up in the expected range I would say volume of 1st, 2nd, 3rd rounders would be more important. Make a trade or 2 and give JB a chance to do what he's best at.
- NorthNuck


Catch 22 - a dilemma or difficult circumstance from which there is no escape because of mutually conflicting or dependent conditions.

Having JB trade to gain draft picks? Oh Lord.
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.24.2014

Dec 5 @ 5:28 PM ET
Kind of like rearranging the deck chairs on the titanic is it not?
- bloatedmosquito


I agree. Megna+Chaput+Skille+Labate+Burrows don't exactly scream Stanley cup, but whatever gives us a fighting chance.
golfingsince
Location: This message is Marwood approved!
Joined: 11.30.2011

Dec 5 @ 5:29 PM ET
Not from a draft perspective. What are they trying to achieve here?

This season's about draft picks and trading veterans. When do people start seriously talking about what's available to the canucks at this draft?

I'm surprised that we are still talking about line combinations. Why does it matter? This is one of our lost seasons...

- bloatedmosquito


Slight edit.

Also, down goes brown talking about Sedins to the Habs. I'd love to see them go there and win. I can't see them being moved though.
belcherbd
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Nanaimo
Joined: 02.16.2007

Dec 5 @ 5:29 PM ET
Not from a draft perspective. What are they trying to achieve here?

This season's about draft picks and trading veterans. When do people start seriously talking about what's available to the canucks at this draft?

I'm surprised that we are still talking about line combinations. Why does it matter? This is our lost season...

- bloatedmosquito


I disagree, they are all lost seasons.

bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks
Location: A dose of reality in this cesspool of glee
Joined: 10.22.2011

Dec 5 @ 5:35 PM ET
Slight edit.

Also, down goes brown talking about Sedins to the Habs. I'd love to see them go there and win. I can't see them being moved though.

- golfingsince


I thought the same about Naslund. But I was happy he got a chance to play in NY. I would feel the same way about the twins if they went to Montreal. Go get that Stanley Cup because it ain't happening here. Not in the next four years anyway.
neem55
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 02.02.2012

Dec 5 @ 5:38 PM ET
Catch 22 - a dilemma or difficult circumstance from which there is no escape because of mutually conflicting or dependent conditions.

Having JB trade to gain draft picks? Oh Lord.

- bloatedmosquito


That is not a catch 22. he's simply not done this as a GM yet and needs to start this year. Seems speculation is FA is hamstringing his ability to do these moves and is in favor of competing now (I'm not sure he really watches game, he just wants to see the arena full) and so want the "win now moves" just to make the playoffs.
NorthNuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Yellowknife, NWT
Joined: 05.30.2016

Dec 5 @ 5:40 PM ET
I think if we can get a top 5 pick out of the lottery or because we are a bottom 5 team great, but if you are going to start moving Hansen and other players I want additional high picks not a slightly better position.

I like Benning's chances of getting a couple of good players at 8 and 29 or 8 and 35 etc than moving a down 3 spots to get a possibly superior player.

- belcherbd

That's why I added the bit and the end. Picking 8th and 29th would be great for us imo, people only seem to care about how high the picks are but volume is more important
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks
Location: A dose of reality in this cesspool of glee
Joined: 10.22.2011

Dec 5 @ 5:41 PM ET
I disagree, they are all lost seasons.
- belcherbd


I think the organization can take pride in the back-to-back prez trophies even if the league has done everything in their power to dismiss the achievement of being the best team in the regular season.

It's a completely insignificant honour. The reward system in the NHL is a hot mess. Has been for years.

NorthNuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Yellowknife, NWT
Joined: 05.30.2016

Dec 5 @ 5:42 PM ET
Catch 22 - a dilemma or difficult circumstance from which there is no escape because of mutually conflicting or dependent conditions.

Having JB trade to gain draft picks? Oh Lord.

- bloatedmosquito

You just have to compensate in each deal for his customary 2nd and it'll be fine
Makita
Referee
Vancouver Canucks
Location: #theonlyrealfan, BC
Joined: 02.16.2007

Dec 5 @ 5:45 PM ET
Not from a draft perspective. What are they trying to achieve here?

This season's about draft picks and trading veterans. When do people start seriously talking about what's available to the canucks at this draft?

I'm surprised that we are still talking about line combinations. Why does it matter? This is our lost season...

- bloatedmosquito


Sorry bloated I was being an asshat about a conversation from earlier today.

I'm not sure you have to worry about 26th or 28th or even 30th place. The talent on this team is really lacking, both on offense and defense.

But that being said, they will try to win every game possible, and where they finish is where the finish.

And then people can complain they didn't tank and the cycle continues.
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla!
Joined: 08.15.2014

Dec 5 @ 5:46 PM ET

- Vanoxy

lol true
NorthNuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Yellowknife, NWT
Joined: 05.30.2016

Dec 5 @ 5:46 PM ET
Sorry bloated I was being an asshat about a conversation from earlier today.

I'm not sure you have to worry about 26th or 28th or even 30th place. The talent on this team is really lacking, both on offense and defense.

But that being said, they will try to win every game possible, and where they finish is where the finish.

And then people can complain they didn't tank and the cycle continues.

- Makita

I'd rather pick 8th, take the slow road to building this team up, and have the franchise maintain some dignity unlike EDM, TOR, BUF, etc.

What's the point in watching if we aren't trying to win?
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks
Location: A dose of reality in this cesspool of glee
Joined: 10.22.2011

Dec 5 @ 5:47 PM ET
That is not a catch 22. he's simply not done this as a GM yet and needs to start this year. Seems speculation is FA is hamstringing his ability to do these moves and is in favor of competing now (I'm not sure he really watches game, he just wants to see the arena full) and so want the "win now moves" just to make the playoffs.
- neem55


It's a catch 22 if the person who is given the responsibility of getting this team out of its current mess is the same person who's had a hand in putting the team in the mess it's in.

Trading is not JB strength. Maybe he's hasn't earned league cred yet but his trades have been Meh so far.
NorthNuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Yellowknife, NWT
Joined: 05.30.2016

Dec 5 @ 5:48 PM ET
It's a catch 22 if the person who is given the responsibility of getting this team out of its current mess is the same person who's had a hand in putting the team in the mess it's in.

Trading is not JB strength. Maybe he's hasn't earned league cred yet but his trades have been Meh so far.

- bloatedmosquito

JBs trades haven't put us where we are. If you really think that, you have a very short memory...
belcherbd
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Nanaimo
Joined: 02.16.2007

Dec 5 @ 5:48 PM ET
I think the organization can take pride in the back-to-back prez trophies even if the league has done everything in their power to dismiss the achievement of being the best team in the regular season.

It's a completely insignificant honour. The reward system in the NHL is a hot mess. Has been for years.


- bloatedmosquito


I think there are many things this organization can take pride in and personally I don't know that winning the cup is all that significant as a fan.

They are all lost seasons though in the sense that I choose to spend x amount of time reading, watching discussing this team. This year is exciting to watch the development and is no more of a lost season then seeing them win the presidents trophy in 2012 and get knocked out in 5 games.


neem55
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 02.02.2012

Dec 5 @ 5:53 PM ET
That's why I added the bit and the end. Picking 8th and 29th would be great for us imo, people only seem to care about how high the picks are but volume is more important
- NorthNuck


Again, If you look at the volume of quality players picked in the top-5 as opposed to the other 25 picks (26 starting this year) it is very significant. if you take the top-5 from 2006 to 2016 (ten years) and compare it to the rest of the first round picks, the 50 players in the top-5 range is a who's who of HOFer's. While the rest of the first round has a solid amount of those types of performers, it's statistically not even close (even if you just compare 1-5 to 6-10 it's not very close) which shouldn't be much of surprise. In "weak' drafts like some are alleging this year's is, picking in the top-5 is actually even more pertinent.

I do agree with that getting more picks is very important (I really, really hope we do), but the value of top-5 picks is simply undeniable.
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks
Location: A dose of reality in this cesspool of glee
Joined: 10.22.2011

Dec 5 @ 5:56 PM ET
I'd rather pick 8th, take the slow road to building this team up, and have the franchise maintain some dignity unlike EDM, TOR, BUF, etc.

What's the point in watching if we aren't trying to win?

- NorthNuck


I like to use WC's Team North America as an example of how to generate excitement around a team that might be able to complete with the league elite. Youth, skill, enthusiasm, and team determination. I can accept those as entertainment in place of just winning.

In their heyday, NJ Devils won a lot. Not very exciting though...

If there in another Laine, McDavid, Ekblad, or even a MacKinnon available in the draft you got to go for it. One pick could change the whole atmosphere around a bad team.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21  Next