Location: Show me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser." - Jack Eichel-, CA Joined: 02.11.2009
Dec 28 @ 12:40 AM ET
I don't know if anybody watched Nico today for the world juniors but I think with Patrick not playing he has a possibility of taking over the first overall pick but I'm hoping he lands second or third overall for us if not
but at the time they were considered high prospects and High picks - GERBE!!!75PTS
Not really. Myers was highly inconsistent, Stafford was a rental, Lemeiux was a 2nd rounder projected to be at best a 3rd liner, Armia couldn't crack the Sabres lineup (think about that for a minute) and it was a conditional 1st round pick that would be the last of our 3.
Location: Show me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser." - Jack Eichel-, CA Joined: 02.11.2009
Dec 28 @ 1:06 AM ET
Not really. Myers was highly inconsistent, Stafford was a rental, Lemeiux was a 2nd rounder projected to be at best a 3rd liner, Armia couldn't crack the Sabres lineup (think about that for a minute) and it was a conditional 1st round pick that would be the last of our 3. - Mentalorgasm5
I understand where you're coming from but at the time the value was high
at the very best right now it would be a 1 for 1 trade
I understand where you're coming from but at the time the value was high
at the very best right now it would be a 1 for 1 trade - GERBE!!!75PTS
I dont think that. If you are trading for an NHL player, than most likely. However, if you move him for future assets, it would most likely be two B rated prospects (aka lemieux and Armia) and a conditional 2nd that could turn into a 1st.
