HA! I was thinking the same thing but luckily Brian Propp will most likely be passed before The Kid passes Hank.
- Beatle_john

Should be a tight race to see who the next is to make 1000.

Ok its time for my crazy ass trade offer...
Carve me up idc 😂😂

JVR/1/2 for Tanev/JV/Hansen
- Nighthawk

Tanev > JVR
JV = 1st (but i'd want a 7 or higher).
Hansen = 2nd.

not crazy, but i wouldn't.
probably get better value if you split em up.

plus. Toronto.

How is a TV interview with JB a claim? Its a fact actually. So the only person making up BS is you.

and no where did I EVER at any point say Its ALL this or or ALL that. Thats what YOU put in there, not me. Im addressing 1 specific thing not an all or nothing statement. Sorry I dont think that way, too bad you seem to. Come on man I know youre smarter than that and I know you can read.
- SMBDragon

You make reference to stuff you saw on TV? In this case, you make a reference to yourself making a claim about something you referenced from TV in the past. You then call it "proof" in the disagreement. Which interview? When? Give us a link. If you can't, then how are people not smart enough to believe you? Give us something besides insults. It's so backwards... you call nothing at all proof,,, then deny making posts that are right here in the thread and forever proof in my quotes. Buy a (frank)ing dictionary. Look up proof.

You make reference to stuff you saw on TV? In this case, you make a reference to yourself making a claim about something you referenced from TV in the past. Which interview? When? Give us a link. If you can't, then how are people not smart enough to believe you? Give us something besides insults.

If you are going to call people stupid then back it up or shut the (frank) up. K coach?
- boonerbuck

I have....and I have posts going back 2 years that go into systems. Its all there to read.

I referenced the interview with JB earlier this season....it was on TV so anyone can find it online. You want it look for it. I already saw the interview so theres not any point in me looking for it. You wanna see it so bad go look for it.

For the record Ive never called anyone stupid except bullfrog. Why you gotta be such a negative D*ckhead?

I have....and I have posts going back 2 years that go into systems. Its all there to read.

I referenced the interview with JB earlier this season....it was on TV so anyone can find it online. You want it look for it. I already saw the interview so theres not any point in me looking for it. You wanna see it so bad go look for it.

For the record Ive never called anyone stupid except bullfrog. Why you gotta be such a negative D*ckhead?
- SMBDragon

Don't play games,,, you question my intelligence and make your "learn to read" comment, and then deny what you are implying. That is right on par with how you post. Say something, deny it, quote something you made up on the spot, call people stupid for challenging it.... rinse repeat.

Jarvis was brought in for as the special teams coach. The PK was already good. The PP sucked. Today, PK is good, PP is still terribad... What changed under Jarvis?

Lidster is our D coach. Our D has improved.

WD was brought in to develop young players. Young players are coming along nicely for the most part.

So much for Dragon's big case about Jarvis being the reason for improvements and WD and Lidster being the goat for all the failures.

ok....was thinkin brew street again. Waitress I wanna pick up there

oh well, pecker could use a day of rest anyways after this week. Body could use a break from booze too. And I gotta work in morning too. I know what'll happen if I go out

btw did you know roosters has topless bullriding and 5 cent wings on wednesdays?
- SMBDragon

Yes, but you just don't see it.
- A_SteamingLombardi

JB himself in a TV interview said he (jarvis) came and made wholesale changes to the team in a few areas namely defense. He said he spend time with the players so that they understood and that he did a real great job.

proof enough? I mentioned this before btw

but to further back that up. Lidster did NOTHING with the defense for 2 straight seasons. Suddenly jarvis comes in with his history of running the D on good teams. Wow omg our D is suddenly drastically changed once he gets here while the usual guy had done nothing for 2 years. Im surprised you even question it when you look at the facts.
- SMBDragon

To further back what up? All you do is make claims,,, and then reference your own claims over and over as fact and backing it up. You are a really bad bullsh!tter.

So having a more durable healthier D has nothing to do with the improvements? Adding depth? Adding skill? Adding size? The reality of a young D that is naturally going to improve season to season has nothing to do with it? Having two defensive aware vets in Sutter and Eriksson in the line up this season? It just Jarvis.... except for when the D fails, then it's WD and Lidster...

You know, when you talk about training, rehab, conditioning, diet etc, it's easy to see you know what you are talking about. It's just as easy to see when you have no idea what you are talking about... or are just stubbornly defending your BS.
- boonerbuck

Tanev > JVR
JV = 1st (but i'd want a 7 or higher).
Hansen = 2nd.

not crazy, but i wouldn't.
probably get better value if you split em up.

plus. Toronto.
- dbot

WOW.

That's a horrible trade for Toronto.
Tanev - seems to always be injured...never played more than 70 games in a season and he scored 20 pts...once. For JVR?

too funny.

I have....and I have posts going back 2 years that go into systems. Its all there to read.

I referenced the interview with JB earlier this season....it was on TV so anyone can find it online. You want it look for it. I already saw the interview so theres not any point in me looking for it. You wanna see it so bad go look for it.

For the record Ive never called anyone stupid except bullfrog. Why you gotta be such a negative D*ckhead?
- SMBDragon

Don't play games,,, you question my intelligence and make your "learn to read" comment, and then deny what you are implying. That is right on par with how you post. Say something, deny it, quote something you made up on the spot, call people stupid for challenging it.... rinse repeat.
- boonerbuck

Deja vu all over again....

Give him a break, his pecker needs a rest.

Give him a break, his pecker needs a rest.
- golfingsince

Top-less bull riding and wings.

WOW.

That's a horrible trade for Toronto.
Tanev - seems to always be injured...never played more than 70 games in a season and he scored 20 pts...once. For JVR?

too funny.
- Fakepartofme

Tanev is worth a lot more than JVR

Top-less bull riding and wings.
- Marwood

I bet two other posters in here are the topless bulls.

Tanev is worth a lot more than JVR
- NorthNuck

Sorry man....no.

WOW.

That's a horrible trade for Toronto.
Tanev - seems to always be injured...never played more than 70 games in a season and he scored 20 pts...once. For JVR?

too funny.
- Fakepartofme

because comparing points between a 2nd line forward and a 1st pairing D-man makes all the sense in the world...

because comparing points between a 2nd line forward and a 1st pairing D-man makes all the sense in the world...
- Codes1087

To be fair Codes, JVR's on pace for 30 goals and 70 points. That's a hell of a return for a 2nd line forward.

To be fair Codes, JVR's on pace for 30 goals and 70 points. That's a hell of a return for a 2nd line forward.
- walshyleafsfan

I am not discrediting JVR's production at all. I am just saying. Apples and Oranges. First Pairing (defensive d-man) compared to a strictly offensive 2nd line forward, points aren't going to be a good argument for the D-man.

PLUS - Taylor Hall was Traded for Adam Larsson. Tanev MIGHT be worth JVR...

I am not discrediting JVR's production at all. I am just saying. Apples and Oranges. First Pairing (defensive d-man) compared to a strictly offensive 2nd line forward, points aren't going to be a good argument for the D-man.

PLUS - Taylor Hall was Traded for Adam Larsson. Tanev MIGHT be worth JVR...
- Codes1087

I agree D is worth (or valued) a lot higher than forwards, especially wingers, even 1st line wingers like JVR. It'd be interesting to see if the Nucks can move Tanev for some youthful pieces, or if they decide to keep him around

ok....was thinkin brew street again. Waitress I wanna pick up there

oh well, pecker could use a day of rest anyways after this week. Body could use a break from booze too. And I gotta work in morning too. I know what'll happen if I go out

btw did you know roosters has topless bullriding and 5 cent wings on wednesdays?
- SMBDragon

I am not discrediting JVR's production at all. I am just saying. Apples and Oranges. First Pairing (defensive d-man) compared to a strictly offensive 2nd line forward, points aren't going to be a good argument for the D-man.

PLUS - Taylor Hall was Traded for Adam Larsson. Tanev MIGHT be worth JVR...
- Codes1087

This. Tanev is better than Larsson so even if you account for the over payment by Edmonton Tanev is still probably worth a 1st line winger

Don't play games,,, you question my intelligence and make your "learn to read" comment, and then deny what you are implying. That is right on par with how you post. Say something, deny it, quote something you made up on the spot, call people stupid for challenging it.... rinse repeat.
- boonerbuck

You forgot that you have to go look everything up. Go find posts from 2 years ago (you know, just go through 700+ blogs and all 15-30 pages of comments in each of them...), find your own links and sources, and then put certain WORDS in CAPS to EMPHASIZE that he doesnt want to EXPLAIN things to YOU