bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: The Clit Whisperer Joined: 10.22.2011
|
|
|
I'd go BPA.
Last time we went for a big and skilled forward specifically.........JV. - golfingsince
JV
He's not a bust yet. But I think that doesn't happen with a top 3 pick. If there is a forward available take it. Start developing replacements for the twins. Bo and Brock are good starts but we need more.
Plus I need something to get excited about. I can't stand what I'm watching now. So little flash out there. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
No matter what people think, we aren't a deep prospect pool. Therefore, I think the answer for the foreseeable future is BPA. - golfingsince
I agree & if a toss up take D eg Foote or Makar |
|
belcherbd
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Nanaimo Joined: 02.16.2007
|
|
|
BPA always. Don't let ownership interfere with drafting... EVER.... - Codes1087
Pass the buck, pretty soon we will be blaming his ex-wife. |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
No matter what people think, we aren't a deep prospect pool. Therefore, I think the answer for the foreseeable future is BPA. - golfingsince
You are right. Our prospect pool is average. What do we lack more? d or scoring? It's pretty simple |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
Keep it simple, draft the player who produces the most offense regardless of origin and size. - belcherbd
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
You are right. Our prospect pool is average. What do we lack more? d or scoring? It's pretty simple - CanuckDon
Nah its a PP 😂😂 |
|
Kaynine
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 10.15.2016
|
|
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
JV
He's not a bust yet. But I think that doesn't happen with a top 3 pick. If there is a forward available take it. Start developing replacements for the twins. Bo and Brock are good starts but we need more.
Plus I need something to get excited about. I can't stand what I'm watching now. So little flash out there. - bloatedmosquito
|
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
You are right. Our prospect pool is average. What do we lack more? d or scoring? It's pretty simple - CanuckDon
I don't think we are in a position to be selective based on position. Our back end is nothing to write home about. |
|
|
|
JV
He's not a bust yet. But I think that doesn't happen with a top 3 pick. If there is a forward available take it. Start developing replacements for the twins. Bo and Brock are good starts but we need more.
Plus I need something to get excited about. I can't stand what I'm watching now. So little flash out there. - bloatedmosquito
Do you have someone in mind at the 10-20 range who it is ? |
|
|
|
Juolevi will be with the Canucks sooner than 3 seasons. Kostin, Vesalainen, Peterrsoson, Andersson, Rasmussen? Should be plenty of solid forward prospects available when we draft. Lots of Swedes for you
Edit. Scoring goals is fun. Our team isn't fun. Let's draft somebody than can let us have fun - CanuckDon
Rasmussen is from Surrey and would be a nice pick. |
|
Nuck4U
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: NY Joined: 10.12.2016
|
|
|
I don't agree with that either.
I hope Juolevi is NHL ready sooner than 3 seasons away.
Got to draft a forward with first pick. Centre for sure. Big and skilled. - bloatedmosquito
I'd prefer that if the BPA was a toss up.
OJ may be closer if played with vets like Tanev or Guddy. My belief is Sbisa is odd man out for next season either by trade or Vegas pick |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
I'd prefer that if the BPA was a toss up.
OJ may be closer if played with vets like Tanev or Guddy. My belief is Sbisa is odd man out for next season either by trade or Vegas pick - Nuck4U
He's done wonders for Hutton's game. |
|
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Joined: 09.24.2014
|
|
|
Pass the buck, pretty soon we will be blaming his ex-wife. - belcherbd
could you imagine if we had taken Larkin right now... |
|
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: The Clit Whisperer Joined: 10.22.2011
|
|
|
- CanuckDon
I understand the concept of BPA but this is still supposed to be entertaining. Young Dmen are only so exciting. Their position requires restraint.
During the rebuild I'm not so worried about losing games. I would rather lose games 7-6 instead of 4-1 with 18 shots for. The flash and dash is what makes major league sports worth watching. |
|
phyllee
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Joined: 06.24.2014
|
|
|
Do you have someone in mind at the 10-20 range who it is ? - VANTEL
Foote, Tippet, Vesalainen, Cody Glass |
|
Whiskey-Tango
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Classification: Bipolar-Tanker, QC Joined: 12.10.2011
|
|
|
Speaking of O.J, looks like he got bumped down the Knights depth chart once again with the acquisition of Vande Sompel |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
I don't think we are in a position to be selective based on position. Our back end is nothing to write home about. - golfingsince
You just can't see it |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
He's done wonders for Hutton's game. - golfingsince
Oh please...stop making excuses for Hutton. He was an anchor for EG |
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
I think thats no problem.
JB is the scouting wizard & draftist.
Tallon a draftist & trader & contract man.
Covered pretty good for a superteam in mngt. - Nighthawk
Ive always been in favor of the superteam concept. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Top need is a playmaking 200' top 2C.
Another great skating offensive D to QB the PP is good also. Decent size as well.
Never enough good D. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Ive always been in favor of the superteam concept. - SMBDragon
Ever since the Superboss days of old same here. |
|
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: The Clit Whisperer Joined: 10.22.2011
|
|
|
Do you have someone in mind at the 10-20 range who it is ? - VANTEL
The 10-20 range (frank)ing sucks. I don't care who they take at that range because it will be left up to this team's development system to get the most out of that player... unless JB gets lucky and finds a player who everyone else missed. Not great odds of that happening though.
If you get a top 5 pick it gives you options. If it's a poor draft then you can trade it for a positional need or a later draft pick or two.
4 of the top 5 prospects are forwards. I think you got to look at them and see who fits your needs best and hope they develop quickly or at best step right into the NHL. |
|
hillbillydeluxe
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: I didn't read it , BC Joined: 09.21.2013
|
|
|
Top need is a playmaking 200' top 2C.
Another great skating offensive D to QB the PP is good also. Decent size as well.
Never enough good D. - Nighthawk
just hoping we draft someone that can score and often. |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
Oh please...stop making excuses for Hutton. He was an anchor for EG - CanuckDon
Oh please......stop making excuses for EG. He was an anchor for Hutton. |
|