|
|
We could get a lot more than just Gallagher. They would need to add a 1st as well. Maybe more. - Retinalz
I'd be okay with Gallagher and a pick for Tanev personally (though how high that pick would be is subjective i believe), I know he's a shrimp but he doesnt play like it.... he's 24 and his value has dropped a ton it seems. He's got speed, seems like him and Horvat/Sutters game would go well together.
I'd love to see JB try to scoop him up for Sbisa/hansen or something straight up. Try to get him on a deal, with the emergence of Radulov/Galchenyuk and Pacioretty returning to form, it seems like there's a trade to be made for Gallagher, Habs need more d men. |
|
|
|
We could get a lot more than just Gallagher. They would need to add a 1st as well. Maybe more. - Retinalz
So
Tanev >Gallagher, a first, + ??? |
|
|
|
Posted this a month or so,
Tanev for Juulsen and 2nd (17) 2nd (18). |
|
dbot
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down Joined: 10.22.2008
|
|
|
I'd be okay with Gallagher and a pick for Tanev personally (though how high that pick would be is subjective i believe), I know he's a shrimp but he doesnt play like it.... he's 24 and his value has dropped a ton it seems. He's got speed, seems like him and Horvat/Sutters game would go well together.
I'd love to see JB try to scoop him up for Sbisa/hansen or something straight up. Try to get him on a deal, with the emergence of Radulov/Galchenyuk and Pacioretty returning to form, it seems like there's a trade to be made for Gallagher, Habs need more d men. - Crazybagoham
I was unaware of his value dropping, but you could be right there.
He's on IR at the moment.
Like you said he's young, signed for a great term/amount.
He'd be a great addition to the top6. plays with heart is like the best of Hansen/Burrows in their primes.
Gallagher for Sbisa/Hansen/Subban.
Mtl needs help on D (Sbisa is signed for another year), Hansen can play anywhere and is signed for another year.
Subban...the headlines write themselves! |
|
dbot
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down Joined: 10.22.2008
|
|
|
Posted this a month or so,
Tanev for Juulsen and 2nd (17) 2nd (18). - Reubenkincade
Tanev for a 1st and 2 2nds?
I would be stoked...but that's |
|
dbot
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down Joined: 10.22.2008
|
|
|
So
Tanev >Gallagher, a first, + ??? - Redmile247
Hey, didn't you guys pay similar for Hamilton...how do you compare them actually?
i know they play different games but... |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
Redmile, it would be so funny to see Vegas come out guns a blazing trading all their picks for players and taking a run at the cup their first season. |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
Vegas isn't trading their first - Redmile247
Yes, there is a decent chance they would trade us their first. Afterall, we have a 25% chance of obtaining Columbus 2nd and it has immeasurable value.
To answer your earlier question, yes, I am mad we signed Bautista and not Edwing |
|
|
|
Redmile, it would be so funny to see Vegas come out guns a blazing trading all their picks for players and taking a run at the cup their first season. - golfingsince
Vegas wins cup in first season ...moves to Quebec after 3 seasons |
|
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Joined: 09.24.2014
|
|
|
We could get a lot more than just Gallagher. They would need to add a 1st as well. Maybe more. - Retinalz
1st and Gallagher for Tanev??? Really? |
|
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Cumberland, BC Joined: 03.18.2010
|
|
|
- CanuckDon
That is how I felt when I saw Tanev for Gallagher. |
|
|
|
Yes, there is a decent chance they would trade us their first. Afterall, we have a 25% chance of obtaining Columbus 2nd and it has immeasurable value.
To answer your earlier question, yes, I am mad we signed Bautista and not Edwing - CanuckDon
I agree with all of this |
|
phyllee
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Joined: 06.24.2014
|
|
|
1st and Gallagher for Tanev??? Really? - Codes1087
Do you think thats to high or low? |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
Vegas wins cup in first season ...moves to Quebec after 3 seasons - Redmile247
Must be a kick in the nuts to have the Raiders moving to town. |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
That is how I felt when I saw Tanev for Gallagher. - Marwood
Not a patient bunch here...at least it's not Kadri? |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
I agree with all of this - Redmile247
Thank you for agreeing. You are correct |
|
|
|
Hey, didn't you guys pay similar for Hamilton...how do you compare them actually?
i know they play different games but... - dbot
I would say gally a first + is more than a first and 2 2nds ...just my opinion tho
It's hard to compare them as tanev is a guy who is better at shutting guys down then putting up points and Dougie is a guy who is better at producing offence and driving play than shutting guys down
Personally I think they would be a good pair together
|
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
That is how I felt when I saw Tanev for Gallagher. - Marwood
What could we get for Subban and Columbus' 2nd? Crosby? 2 first round picks? |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
I would say gally a first + is more than a first and 2 2nds ...just my opinion tho
It's hard to compare them as tanev is a guy who is better at shutting guys down then putting up points and Dougie is a guy who is better at producing offence and driving play than shutting guys down
Personally I think they would be a good pair together
- Redmile247
So Monahan for Tanev, it's settled. |
|
phyllee
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Joined: 06.24.2014
|
|
|
So Monahan for Tanev, it's settled. - golfingsince
Monahan is young and already having back issues, not worth the gamble |
|
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Joined: 09.24.2014
|
|
|
Do you think thats to high or low? - phyllee
I think the Habs would be crazy to trade Gallagher and a 1st for Tanev. |
|
|
|
Must be a kick in the nuts to have the Raiders moving to town. - golfingsince
Raiders coming after with a team built to go to the super bowl
It must feel like losing your virginity before your big brother does to a fat chick and then have him marry a model |
|
|
|
So Monahan for Tanev, it's settled. - golfingsince
No ....god no ... |
|
|
|
Monahan is young and already having back issues, not worth the gamble - phyllee
|
|