Location: I'll take some olives on my pizza!, NY Joined: 03.13.2015
Feb 2 @ 9:02 AM ET
This is the most egregious proof yet that the guy has to go.
Groulx or Gallant NOW - Der Kaiser
This is also why he kept Grant, plays foligno up to 20 minutes sometimes, put Carrier on the top line, and thinks gorges can play with risto. murray needs to sober up and find a coach.
Location: I Know Nothink ... NOTHINK! Joined: 07.27.2007
Feb 2 @ 9:05 AM ET
I don't get it. Okposo, Kane, ROR, even Eichel are incredibly hard on the puck and on the forecheck. They are tough to play against.
People are seriously reaching for ways to criticize Bylsma.
This team needs defense, defense, and then more defense. Then another top 6 forward - sbroads24
I don't know how you define "hard on the puck" or "hard on the forecheck" but of the four you identify I would say only Kane throws his body around on the forecheck. (Btw, foligno Girgs, carrier and dLo do that too.)
But Okposo ROR and Eichel - and the rest of the Top 9 - forecheck through positioning and (generally legal) stickwork.
And while positioning and stickwork might under some definition be "hard on the forecheck" and hard on the puck" it's NOT "grinding."
Location: We are in 30th place. It's 2017 , NY Joined: 02.12.2012
Feb 2 @ 9:13 AM ET
I don't know how you define "hard on the puck" or "hard on the forecheck" but of the four you identify I would say only Kane throws his body around on the forecheck. (Btw, foligno Girgs, carrier and dLo do that too.)
But Okposo ROR and Eichel - and the rest of the Top 9 - forecheck through positioning and (generally legal) stickwork.
And while positioning and stickwork might under some definition be "hard on the forecheck" and hard on the puck" it's NOT "grinding." - Der Kaiser
Hitting isn't grinding. Hitting means you don't have the puck or don't intend to have the puck. ROR and Okposo are both good at getting on top of players and forcing turnovers, or being hard to play against. They don't float.
D-lo is good at hitting and taking himself out of a play. I'd say that's not too hard to play against
I think the offseason will be boring too, especially when Tim Murray looks in his wallet and can't find multiple 1st's and 2nds or prospects to deal with. - sbroads24
bazinga
I think he'll be active because he has to be. If they're not in a wildcard spot by the end of next season he's done imo.
Location: Where ever Matt Ellis allows me to be, NY Joined: 07.30.2012
Feb 2 @ 9:24 AM ET
gionta's agent calls murray and says brian wants to sign a 1 year 2 miller dollar deal with the sabres the day after the expansion draft
do you
A. Take it
B. Tell him your going in a different direction next year
C. Tell him yes as long as he wears an A instead of a C on his jersey - homiedclown
C
Actually it should be A and Gionta should know to give the C up himself
gionta's agent calls murray and says brian wants to sign a 1 year 2 miller dollar deal with the sabres the day after the expansion draft
do you
A. Take it B. Tell him your going in a different direction next year
C. Tell him yes as long as he wears an A instead of a C on his jersey - homiedclown
Betting on a guy going on 39 isnt what we should be doing.
gionta's agent calls murray and says brian wants to sign a 1 year 2 miller dollar deal with the sabres the day after the expansion draft
do you
A. Take it
B. Tell him your going in a different direction next year
C. Tell him yes as long as he wears an A instead of a C on his jersey - homiedclown
B
He's had a nice year and filled the role he was brought in for admirably. But it's time to move on and give some of our young forwards a chance. Take Moulson and/or Ennis with him if he can.
Betting on a guy going on 39 isnt what we should be doing. - Sabresfan-365
If they can clear even some of the dead weight, meaning Ennis and Moulson, then bringing back Gionta at $2M for one year hurts nothing, especially when he will be on the 4th line if he is not producing.
I know, Dan will play him more than he should, blah blah blah.