Nuck4U
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: NY Joined: 10.12.2016
|
|
|
Do some posters still think we will be buyers at the deadline? - CanuckDon
not even FA, TL, JB and WD combined do.... why would any poster |
|
nelson911
Pittsburgh Penguins |
|
|
Joined: 02.03.2007
|
|
|
I dont love the lineup by any means. But when youre losing games to coaching errors and lack of in game decisions or poor decisions then you have to part ways with the coach. No one here likes the decision of playing dorsett and sitting sedins with 5 min left and down a goal. SOme of those games you will win some you wont. But we'd be better positioned for making playoffs with those wins. - SMBDragon
Oh he had his little run there where he liked Dorsett... hes been gone for awhile... what of more recently |
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
You are deflecting. People challenge your coach talk. They don't deny the obvious like "deployment matters" or not smart enough to understand "coaching decissions matter" which is what you always start accusing people of when you are challenged about who is in charge of what behind the bench. People argue about your observations... and who makes which decissions... if you are not just deflecting.. then the "not understanding" is mostly on your end.
Claiming you backed something up two years ago and don't feel like repeating yourself over and over and claiming challengers are not smart enough to see it is a complete joke.
You know what else is a joke? Recently you claiming you were better at certain aspects of NHL coaching that WD. You, who has no pro coaching experience if any at all. Just like when you claimed you were better than the Canucks scouts... serious about these claims... willing to argue over it even.
- boonerbuck
do you remember how it was received? I simply dont care to go over it again in a group that doesnt want to see that side of it. I made a decision that it was a waste of my time to do so. Its there in the past for you to read so have at er.
Yes I said that about being better at certain aspects than WD sure. But not on scouts, not sure what youre referring to there. wth are you talking about?
please dont misconstrue my words, I never said people werent smart enough, I said that they dont see what I was saying, which is very very different. THats how YOU interpreted it, not what I actually said. |
|
|
|
Oh he had his little run there where he liked Dorsett... hes been gone for awhile... what of more recently - nelson911
You guys want Sutter Back??? |
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
Oh he had his little run there where he liked Dorsett... hes been gone for awhile... what of more recently - nelson911
and then he played the replacements megna and chaput in his place.
at least megna is coming on a bit and contributing recently.
Point is most here will tell you the idea of playing grinders instead of goalscorers in that scenario isnt too smart. |
|
Marwood
|
|
|
Location: Cumberland, BC Joined: 03.18.2010
|
|
|
do you remember how it was received? I simply dont care to go over it again in a group that doesnt want to see that side of it. I made a decision that it was a waste of my time to do so. Its there in the past for you to read so have at er.
Yes I said that about being better at certain aspects than WD sure. But not on scouts, not sure what youre referring to there.
please dont misconstrue my words, I never said people werent smart enough, I said that they dont see what I was saying, which is very very different. THats how YOU interpreted it, not what I actually said. - SMBDragon
Stock answer. |
|
nelson911
Pittsburgh Penguins |
|
|
Joined: 02.03.2007
|
|
|
You guys want Sutter Back??? - classic321
We knew what you were getting. he aint so bad. He wont produce for the money hes getting now but he'll be good for your teams transition if you wanna call it that |
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
Stock answer. - Marwood
no youre thinking how you operate.
(frank) off goof |
|
|
|
We knew what you were getting. he aint so bad. He wont produce for the money hes getting now but he'll be good for your teams transition if you wanna call it that - nelson911
Of course he wont, he is the highest paid forward in the NHL to never score over 40 points.
|
|
Marwood
|
|
|
Location: Cumberland, BC Joined: 03.18.2010
|
|
|
no youre thinking how you operate.
(frank) off goof - SMBDragon
Learn how to write. Spelling and punctuation are pretty elementary.
You use the same sh*tty argument every time that you are ( or you're ) not going to bother going over it again. |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
Yes. - Marwood
|
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
do you remember how it was received? I simply dont care to go over it again in a group that doesnt want to see that side of it. I made a decision that it was a waste of my time to do so. Its there in the past for you to read so have at er.
Yes I said that about being better at certain aspects than WD sure. But not on scouts, not sure what youre referring to there.
please dont misconstrue my words, I never said people werent smart enough, I said that they dont see what I was saying, which is very very different. THats how YOU interpreted it, not what I actually said. - SMBDragon
Right, you didn't claim that you and Vantel were better and got all butthurt when people started laughing at you. Even Vantel in all seriousness asked you not to attach his name to crazy claims like that. You never backed down on it either. Eventually, the mods had to put an end to all fun people were having over it. You were prety upset. Never did you consider being humble a bit after that to help your situation. No, it was the mods telling people to shut up.
You have been cornered for calling people idiots, or saying they are not smart enough or implying by just using language you can hide behind constantly. You deny it on the same page at times. |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
So far it's only been Bloated and Belcher... but often I think they are the same poster. Good cop bad cop kind of routine...
- boonerbuck
|
|
neem55
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 02.02.2012
|
|
|
So what you are saying is that some drafts are better then others, which would means that there are drafts that are weaker then others? - manvanfan
Yes there is, and in each one of them there is still all stars. Often times, not players you think or know of. So stocking up on picks is a good idea, do I need to slow down or are you still with me? |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
You guys want Sutter Back??? - classic321
Frank off |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
Stock answer. - Marwood
He did exactly what I said he'd been doing.
How to win your opponents argument for him 101.
|
|
nelson911
Pittsburgh Penguins |
|
|
Joined: 02.03.2007
|
|
|
Of course he wont, he is the highest paid forward in the NHL to never score over 40 points. - classic321
The expansion draft is available for his disposal... would more than likely be taken by Vegas |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
no youre thinking how you operate.
(frank) off goof - SMBDragon
You are definitely not from Toronto. |
|
RealityChecker
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: I stay away from the completely crazy rumours on the internet.I will occasionally debunk them-Eklund Joined: 04.18.2010
|
|
|
it's nice to see that valentine's day has seen everybody paired up:
|
|
RealityChecker
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: I stay away from the completely crazy rumours on the internet.I will occasionally debunk them-Eklund Joined: 04.18.2010
|
|
|
You are definitely not from Toronto. - boonerbuck
or he's been inside. |
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
Learn how to write. Spelling and punctuation are pretty elementary.
You use the same sh*tty argument every time that you are ( or you're ) not going to bother going over it again. - Marwood
no one wanted it till I said I was done with it.....so its just pot stirring. Nothing more. Theres years worth of posts on it. Youd just disagree with it anyway just to be an A-hole so whats the point
just go piss off |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
The expansion draft is available for his disposal... would more than likely be taken by Vegas - nelson911
100% he would be taken |
|
|
|
The expansion draft is available for his disposal... would more than likely be taken by Vegas - nelson911
I think Benning gave that scrub a NTC.
|
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
Right, you didn't claim that you and Vantel were better and got all butthurt when people started laughing at you. Even Vantel in all seriousness asked you not to attach his name to crazy claims like that. You never backed down on it either. Eventually, the mods had to put an end to all fun people were having over it. You were prety upset. Never did you consider being humble a bit after that to help your situation. No, it was the mods telling people to shut up.
You have been cornered for calling people idiots, or saying they are not smart enough or implying by just using language you can hide behind constantly. You deny it on the same page at times. - boonerbuck
you can interpret it your negative way if you want. I have posted it many times that it was never calling people idiots and I did the same on the last page as well and yet you're right back at it .... THe original post you refer to never said anything about nhl scouts either.
And no ...I was never butthurt, I simply went to work and didnt post anything. SO youre wrong....yet again |
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
He did exactly what I said he'd been doing.
How to win your opponents argument for him 101.
- boonerbuck
Im simply stating my position on my decision. Why do you have to twist it into something it isnt?
No one wanted a repost of it until I said I was done with it. Simply you found something to whine about and fight about. |
|