See I am the opposite ...I felt the Canucks had little chance in 94 but we're going to roll the bruins in 4/5 games in 2011
- Redmile247
Should have been the case. I know we lost but truthfully the Bruins had no business being on the ice with that Canuck team from 2011. Nucks not only led in every category during the regular season I think we had something like 10 more regulation wins as well in the reg season. Plus the Bruins got some pretty favourable luck vs MTL and TBL that year in the PO's but that's how luck goes sometimes.
The Rome hit and losing Hamhuis changed the entire dynamic of that series. The Rome hit gave Bettman and Campbell the leverage they needed to make rule changes during the SCF which had never happened before. All suspensions in the PO's that year were one game but yet Rome got tossed for the rest of the series…no suspension for Boychuk for breaking Raymond's back and no suspension for Seidenberg cracking Bieksa's ankle with a vicious slash.
But again we had a good enough club where we should have been able to battle Gary's refs (Sutherland) and all of the bullpoop rule changes as well. PP dried up and Lou choked us out in Boston. AV refused to start Schneider in gm 6 and had the team play possum instead of fighting back hoping the PP would return for GM 7…not to be.
The kicker for me was where was Torres and Bieksa when the Bruins were firing pucks in our zone and at our players in warmup to get them rattled? AV I'm sure told them to back off but I just couldn't f**cking believe it. If I was coaching that club I would have had Salo line up at the centre dot and fed him one-timers into the bruins bench…un-fu**cking believable.
All the shoulda woulda coulda's don't matter now. Bottom line is we had the most dominant team in Hockey that year and we should have found a way to battle through it all…but we didn't. Regardless of injuries all teams have them at that point.
I have faith that Horvat, Boeser, Demko and few others will get us deep into the PO's again and we will have our next shot.