|
|
|
|
I have a suspicion Benning might resign them
- CanuckDon
I am sure he will . I was more concerned with Gudbrandson . If they can't come to an agreement LVGN can scoop him up and we would lose an asset |
|
Nuck4U
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: NY
Joined: 10.12.2016
|
|
|
|
If they are not signed they aren't
- VANTEL
I didn't see that in those complicated draft rules. Where did you get the info? Not saying you are wrong. It's just news to me on that issue. |
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't see that in those complicated draft rules. Where did you get the info? Not saying you are wrong. It's just news to me on that issue.
- Nuck4U
It was on the radio yesterday |
|
WhiteLie
Referee
|
|
 |
Location: When youre 7 pages behind Dont bother catching up, you will never get that time back - Codes1087
Joined: 07.26.2010
|
|
|
|
If they are not signed they aren't
- VANTEL
I think they just need to be qualified to ensure they remain property of Vancouver, then Tryamkin will be exempt and Horvat will be protected |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Las Vegas
Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
|
I am sure he will . I was more concerned with Gudbrandson . If they can't come to an agreement LVGN can scoop him up and we would lose an asset
- VANTEL
Worse case they would just qualify him |
|
SRam19
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Messier the Greatest Canucks Captain
Joined: 02.12.2015
|
|
|
|
I am sure he will . I was more concerned with Gudbrandson . If they can't come to an agreement LVGN can scoop him up and we would lose an asset
- VANTEL
He will most likely sign a 4m/3yr deal. |
|
|
|
|
|
I think they just need to be qualified to ensure they remain property of Vancouver, then Tryamkin will be exempt and Horvat will be protected
- WhiteLie
I am not sure of that.
I was under the assumption anyone not under contract is elegible |
|
Nuck4U
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: NY
Joined: 10.12.2016
|
|
|
|
I am sure he will . I was more concerned with Gudbrandson . If they can't come to an agreement LVGN can scoop him up and we would lose an asset
- VANTEL
They can protect him as one of their 3D. Wouldn't matter about contract status, right? I'm not getting this new angle on RFA status being above exempt and protected status. Is this another Bettman loophole... ? |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
|
Horvat Gudbrandson and Tryamkin are RFAs
- VANTEL
Only EG is not exempt |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
|
I think they just need to be qualified to ensure they remain property of Vancouver, then Tryamkin will be exempt and Horvat will be protected
- WhiteLie
Thats right |
|
|
|
|
|
I am sure he will . I was more concerned with Gudbrandson . If they can't come to an agreement LVGN can scoop him up and we would lose an asset
- VANTEL
hope not. |
|
Nuck4U
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: NY
Joined: 10.12.2016
|
|
|
|
I think they just need to be qualified to ensure they remain property of Vancouver, then Tryamkin will be exempt and Horvat will be protected
- WhiteLie
That sounds more reasonable. Though how does that go with UFA right? Like they are property up to July1. So if Vegas takes them. As in signs them by expansion draft. They count as that teams pick. |
|
dbot
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down
Joined: 10.22.2008
|
|
|
|
Oh I'm not just ridiculous wishing an opponent does better.
- Nighthawk
You guys and your hysteria. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Nucker101
Where did you get a picture of Vantel? |
|
SRam19
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Messier the Greatest Canucks Captain
Joined: 02.12.2015
|
|
|
|
Where did you get a picture of Vantel?
- A_SteamingLombardi
Vantel would be holding a box of wine.  |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
|
You guys and your hysteria.
- dbot
Hysteria? More like calling out a so-called Canuck fan😂
|
|
|
|
|
|
Honestly it doesn't really matter who the Canucks lose. Their list is full of scrubs, Vegas would have to find a needle in a hay stack to get someone that will actually matter from the Canucks.
- Nucker101
Even Subban? |
|
|
|
|
|
They can protect him as one of their 3D. Wouldn't matter about contract status, right? I'm not getting this new angle on RFA status being above exempt and protected status. Is this another Bettman loophole... ?
- Nuck4U
From my understanding there is a number of players they can take . UFAs RFAs
I will use this name just as an example but if Canucks protect 7 forwards and expose 2 LVGK can still go off the board and take a Chaput if he is not a protected seven |
|
|
|
|
|
I have a suspicion Benning might resign them
- CanuckDon
I don't know, if he's as dumb as Lefty says. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tryamkin is exempt, Horvat will be protected, Gudbranson will be protected. Whether they are signed or not has no baring on the issue unless Horvat or Gudbranson are not protected. Can't see that happening. |
|
|
|
|
|
Vantel would be holding a box of wine.
- SRam19
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only EG is not exempt
- Nighthawk
You are wrong on that. Yes Bo and Tryamkin are exempt if they are signed . White Lie says as long as they are qualified but I am not sure on that. |
|
|
|
|
|
- A_SteamingLombardi
That is not a falsehood  |
|
|
|
|
|
That is not a falsehood
- VANTEL
 |
|
|
|
|
|
- A_SteamingLombardi
I married a strong wife |
|
