the entire team sucks huh.... thenyou look at the coach if that happens. Wds own words. Look it up
- SMBDragon

I think his calculator is broken

the entire team sucks huh.... thenyou look at the coach if that happens. Wds own words. Look it up
- SMBDragon

Horvat Baer and Gran as well as tree and miller have exceeded expectations so no the entire roster hasnt mailed it in.

Nucking facts..... team sucks but WD isnt the reason.

Haha you got sucked in.
- A_SteamingLombardi

You are the flame throwing troll sucking it on this.

People seem to forget the injuries which makes it a lot tougher to coach.
- Bettmanhatesus

If any team had the injuries we have had they wouldn't be near as good either.

When is it right for the youth to play over the plugs? To further their development in the NHL?
- Nuck4U

THe time is right now & its being done. Next season should be all about doing the same thing & i don't see it not being so. If for any reason thats not the case then its strangeville.

You are the flame throwing troll sucking it on this.
- Nuck4U

If any team had the injuries we have had they wouldn't be near as good either.
- Bettmanhatesus

Would their fans be calling for their coaches head?

You are the flame throwing troll sucking it on this.
- Nuck4U

Yes he is..... but he's pretty good at it.

Lol
Ijust noticed my auto correct is turning F...k into Nuck.....
Stupid autocorrect

You are the flame throwing troll sucking it on this.
- Nuck4U

You're welcome to (frank) off at any time, we're all cheering for that day.

Should we take a poll?

Our highest scoring player is 83rd in league scoring, so yeah our team sucks.
- A_SteamingLombardi

If he were top 10 we would suck also.
U know & we all know the pain is real & a few more years of it is coming.
Thats the reality of it & nobody should think otherwise

You're welcome to (frank) off at any time, we're all cheering for that day.

Should we take a poll?
- A_SteamingLombardi

thats the Nucking spirit

If any team had the injuries we have had they wouldn't be near as good either.
- Bettmanhatesus

No doubt & nobody is close to our man games lost.
It further helps our rebuild as a bonus.

If we trade edler and tanev then we become the oil or the leafs.

The players still play hard. The kids are alright.

To blame the season on the coach is ridiculous.

Have you ever coached?

Do you think av would have us in the show?

Who do you suggest right now?

Nobody better, wait until he loses the room then can him.
Wait until the kids have developed and its time to compete, then hire a playoff coach.
(frank) these are your own words im feeding back to you.

Has he ruined horvat or Baer or Gran?
Hell no.
- Pres.cup

he has been good for the youth, its his in game decisions that most are questioning.

You're welcome to (frank) off at any time, we're all cheering for that day.

Should we take a poll?
- A_SteamingLombardi

Yes he is..... but he's pretty good at it.

Lol
Ijust noticed my auto correct is turning F...k into Nuck.....
Stupid autocorrect
- Pres.cup

Its the predictive turned on not auto-incorrect 😂😂

If he were top 10 we would suck also.
U know & we all know the pain is real & a few more years of it is coming.
Thats the reality of it & nobody should think otherwise
- Nighthawk

Yeah you're 100% right.

Yeah you're 100% right.
- A_SteamingLombardi

ONe thing about u & i conversing is we do not always agree but u r pragmatic.
As for me believe it or not I also am 😂😂
My penchant for deals & line ups is just my way of sizing us up nothing more.

If he were top 10 we would suck also.
U know & we all know the pain is real & a few more years of it is coming.
Thats the reality of it & nobody should think otherwise
- Nighthawk

The ironic thing is, with BB, OJ and the young d a year older we should be better next year with or without WD. Especially I feel we end up with ya that top 2 pick in the lineup. At that point, if we have new coach we'll have months of donkeykong saying "I told you so". I guess it will be better than the "it's all WD" barrels he's been lobbing for years.

Adding to we should not have high expectations soon its not out of the question that stranger things have happened. At any time the Nucks could gel as a team & that would be the next step in the process. That said it would need to be a sign & continue to get better & not be a one off blip on progress to regress after. The 1 year cost of drafting would prolly be a worse off scenario on the longterm outlook. Perennial PO or Cup contending teams need more than a good NHL roster to keep it greased & long lasting.

he has been good for the youth, its his in game decisions that most are questioning.
- Bettmanhatesus

.#stealthtank2017

Remember when he rolled thw lines evenly... omg the top lines not gwtting enough minutes
Now hes making them earn there time and its oh my Nucking god hes not playing the kids enough!


And its definitely auto correcting frank to Nuck

The ironic thing is, with BB, OJ and the young d a year older we should be better next year with or without WD. Especially I feel we end up with ya that top 2 pick in the lineup. At that point, if we have new coach we'll have months of donkeykong saying "I told you so". I guess it will be better than the "it's all WD" barrels he's been lobbing for years.
- neem55

I agree but what does amount to? Prolly kids growing but not a huge translation into wins. If we fire WD i want an offensive coach only that the kids can learn under & idc if playing D & a 200' gets delayed if the offense is unleashed & the results r good.


Now is that coach a Crawford(Crow) or a Gallant or someone else?

Where did i say that?
The youth that prove they belong such as horvat and baer should be up and WD hasnt hurt their play.
Why must you be so argumentative?
Do you belive that all the young players currently on the roster belong in the NHL?

What you quoted had nothing to do with what your talking about.
Take a walk, clear your mind and come back focused.
You dont have to be right all the time...ok.
- Pres.cup

Sounds like you are trying to be a wise a$$ instead of clarify a question. I asked a question because you had two posts saying two different things. You agreed in one with Makita saying the youth all should be developed in the AHL. Then in the other on this thread you said that WD should stay to develop the youth. That's a confusing position.

How you twisted this from me asking a question into something else is hilarious and hypocritical in your accusations. Talk about confusing and not being focused. Keep on assuming that leads to great discussions... notIs the potential you mean, now? Next season? What?. At least I asked for clarification.

By the way Sven is young but not among the youth. Plus he would have to be waived if you thought he could be sent down. Asset management you know. Bo is a vet by now ending year 3 and going to all star game plus leading scorer. Pretty much a no brainer there and not in the youth development question. He like Sven and Granlund are in the young guys taking over lead talk which is a different development.

As for the youth I don't know where they belong as of yet. That's why seeing what they could do when losses don't matter is a good use of these games.

The ironic thing is, with BB, OJ and the young d a year older we should be better next year with or without WD. Especially I feel we end up with ya that top 2 pick in the lineup. At that point, if we have new coach we'll have months of donkeykong saying "I told you so". I guess it will be better than the "it's all WD" barrels he's been lobbing for years.
- neem55

We should all take into account we have the worst schedule by far in the league and these young guys havnt experienced anything like this, they are worn out by feb march.

Sounds like you are trying to be a wise a$$ instead of clarify a question. I asked a question because you had two posts saying two different things. You agreed in one with Makita saying the youth all should be developed in the AHL. Then in the other on this thread you said that WD should stay to develop the youth. That's a confusing position.

How you twisted this from me asking a question into something else is hilarious and hypocritical in your accusations. Talk about confusing and not being focused. Keep on assuming that leads to great discussions... notIs the potential you mean, now? Next season? What?. At least I asked for clarification.

By the way Sven is young but not among the youth. Plus he would have to be waived if you thought he could be sent down. Asset management you know. Bo is a vet by now ending year 3 and going to all star game plus leading scorer. Pretty much a no brainer there and not in the youth development question. He like Sven and Granlund are in the young guys taking over lead talk which is a different development.

As for the youth I don't know where they belong as of yet. That's why seeing what they could do when losses don't matter is a good use of these games.
- Nuck4U

WTF?

Sounds like you are trying to be a wise a$$ instead of clarify a question. I asked a question because you had two posts saying two different things. You agreed in one with Makita saying the youth all should be developed in the AHL. Then in the other on this thread you said that WD should stay to develop the youth. That's a confusing position.

How you twisted this from me asking a question into something else is hilarious and hypocritical in your accusations. Talk about confusing and not being focused. Keep on assuming that leads to great discussions... notIs the potential you mean, now? Next season? What?. At least I asked for clarification.

By the way Sven is young but not among the youth. Plus he would have to be waived if you thought he could be sent down. Asset management you know. Bo is a vet by now ending year 3 and going to all star game plus leading scorer. Pretty much a no brainer there and not in the youth development question. He like Sven and Granlund are in the young guys taking over lead talk which is a different development.

As for the youth I don't know where they belong as of yet. That's why seeing what they could do when losses don't matter is a good use of these games.
- Nuck4U

Make sense to me: somebody guys need to develop at the AHL others at the NHL. Guys need to develop, that development happens at various levels. I don't see a contradiction, maybe just a misunderstanding