I find scoring chances a highly subjective stat. I think the graph you posted last blog said we said scoring chances were 19-13 last game (can't remember if that was ES or not) we didn't even have that many shots and I wouldn't call every one we did take a scoring chance. But that's just choosing which measurement.
Where we'll continue to disagree is when the play of the goalies is considered luck. The rest of the skaters can get outplayed, which of what happened particularly against Washington, but if one team's goalie is playong much better than the other, that is the ultimate equalizer. But because it doesn't fit the advanced stats narrituve it is labeled luck.
EDIT: I used shots per game instead of cf%, so ignore the first paragraph.
- Tojo.
One goalie outplaying the another isn't necessarily luck. BUT, when it's a goalie who has been pretty average for the most recent stretch of his career outplaying a goalie thats been a back-to-back Vezina candidate.. THAT is why I call it luck. One goalie playing well above what he is known for, and One goalie playing well below what he is known for.
No one, except for maybe Grinder would have called that poop at ALL. It was out of the norm.