My point was that on a team who's leading scorer last year had 52 points, blaming a depth dman for scoring woes when Tanev has a career high 20 points and Gudbranson has a career high 13 is laughable.
In comparison, Biega's 11 points in 100 games isn't so bad. I'm not really looking for my 3rd pairing Dmen to provide the offensive spark, i rely on forwards for that. - golfingsince
Isn't so bad? Even Gudbranson scores about 15 points about every 100 games. Less then Guds is pretty freakin bad.
Gagner and Biega on 2 on 1 and Gagner decides not to pass it to him. They don't even get a shot. They have such little faith
Isn't so bad? Even Gudbranson scores about 15 points about every 100 games. Less then Guds is pretty freakin bad.
Gagner and Biega on 2 on 1 and Gagner decides not to pass it to him. They don't even get a shot. They have such little faith - manvanfan
Who the hell cares? He's a depth dman who's job is to play well defensively and be physical. As long as he isn't coughing up the puck and is limiting scoring chances then hes doing his job.
Next we're gonna complain that Boeser isn't throwing enough big hits.
