I never said other things shouldn't be talked about. But people are talking in length about Gudbrandsons turn overs when it was two massive mistakes by Tanev and Hutton that cost us the game. Nobody talks about that, Guddy made a few mistakes, but they did not cost us them game so why focus on that as the reason why we lost.
- Retinalz

Hot topic now since Shannon stirred the rumor pot.

I never said other things shouldn't be talked about. But people are talking in length about Gudbrandsons turn overs when it was two massive mistakes by Tanev and Hutton that cost us the game. Nobody talks about that, Guddy made a few mistakes, but they did not cost us them game so why focus on that as the reason why we lost.
- Retinalz

I'm OK with Tanev out there (even with the own goal) for the shutdown role but Hutton should not have been put in that situation.

Hot topic now since Shannon stirred the rumor pot.
- VanHockeyGuy

Its been longer than that i feel. Really shot off at the demers nixed deal.

throw Calgary a curve ball and start him...
- LordHumungous

Yeah, show Calgary how goal tending is played.

I never said other things shouldn't be talked about. But people are talking in length about Gudbrandsons turn overs when it was two massive mistakes by Tanev and Hutton that cost us the game. Nobody talks about that, Guddy made a few mistakes, but they did not cost us them game so why focus on that as the reason why we lost.
- Retinalz

Ok, perhaps I misread it, or misinterpreted what you were trying to say? "The only mistakes that should be talked about in length are the ones that turn into a goal against."

If player A is continually giving the puck away, but has been lucky enough for those turnovers not to turn into goals against "yet", I think it's fair to suggest that at some point those will turn into goals against.

Ok, perhaps I misread it, or misinterpreted what you were trying to say? "The only mistakes that should be talked about in length are the ones that turn into a goal against."

If player A is continually giving the puck away, but has been lucky enough for those turnovers not to turn into goals against "yet", I think it's fair to suggest that at some point those will turn into goals against.
- 1970vintage

I specifically said "in length". That does not mean we shouldn't talk about other things from the game, but we focus on one player even though they weren't the main problem last night. Mistakes were made all around, but most of them didn't turn into goals.

Gudbranson and Vanek both on TSN top 10 nhl trade bait

Gudbranson and Vanek both on TSN top 10 nhl trade bait
- Codes1087

lol...neither are going anywhere...

If there is blame to put on loss or results it shouldn't be a particular player as the whole team had issues. Which means TG failed to make enough adjustments. Also deployment choice with a minute left backfired.

lol...neither are going anywhere...
- LordHumungous

Sbisa above them both at number 3 lol

If there was a time to shake up team bringing in Gaunce to play against heavier Flames would fit. I'd sit Burmi or Gagner.

Sbisa above them both at number 3 lol
- Codes1087

Martinez won't be traded, he doesn't belong on this list since LA will need him for playoffs.

If I were Benning I would look at a Guddy + Baerschi for Galch + cond 3rd(if they make playoffs we get 2nd)

Again, now from that tool Botchford,

TSN Radio Vancouver‏Verified account @TSN1040 1m1 minute ago
More
.@botchford on Gudbranson: They will not be willing to lose him for nothing, because that would mean admitting to a pretty big mistake

Boucher called up and allowed to exceed roster because of NHL rule where Nilsson not available because of expecting baby.

I'm bummed that Del Zotto didn't get to hear his goal song last night, but looking forward to seeing Jagr back in the lineup tonight - and hoping Thatcher Demko starts - vs. the Flames.

http://www.hockeybuzz.com...trip-in-Calgary/194/88735