Location: I Know Nothink ... NOTHINK! Joined: 07.27.2007
Jan 27 @ 8:37 AM ET
Casey Nelson career stats: 0.17ppg. He was an undrafted free agent. Cost to acquire: 0.00
Jack Roslovic career stats: 0.11ppg. He was the last piece of a blockbuster trade, every piece of which has been been followed obsessively night and day in a very odd - very peculiar - way for almost exactly THREE years.
So let’s all jump up and down about the spine tingling talent GMTM threw away when he traded Jack Roslovic.
It bears mentioning, in this regard, that another word often bandied about in these pages, in connection with the talent exchanged in that very trade, is “irreplaceable”.
Casey Nelson, and 30 or 40 other players that enter the ranks of professional hockey every year, makes 0.111 ppg expendable.
But please SBroads, set your text alerts to Jack (frank)ing Roslovic, and let us all know how quickly his snappy 0.111 becomes as torrid as Joel Armia’s 0.333.
Location: Arriving Somewhere But Not Here Joined: 02.10.2011
Jan 27 @ 10:00 AM ET
Casey Nelson career stats: 0.17ppg. He was an undrafted free agent. Cost to acquire: 0.00
Jack Roslovic career stats: 0.11ppg. He was the last piece of a blockbuster trade, every piece of which has been been followed obsessively night and day in a very odd - very peculiar - way for almost exactly THREE years.
So let’s all jump up and down about the spine tingling talent GMTM threw away when he traded Jack Roslovic.
It bears mentioning, in this regard, that another word often bandied about in these pages, in connection with the talent exchanged in that very trade, is “irreplaceable”.
Casey Nelson, and 30 or 40 other players that enter the ranks of professional hockey every year, makes 0.111 ppg expendable.
But please SBroads, set your text alerts to Jack (frank)ing Roslovic, and let us all know how quickly his snappy 0.111 becomes as torrid as Joel Armia’s 0.333.
Meantime I’m gonna walk the dog. - Der Kaiser
Some just can't seem to get over it. It's actually quite hilarious and sad, all at once.
Casey Nelson career stats: 0.17ppg. He was an undrafted free agent. Cost to acquire: 0.00
Jack Roslovic career stats: 0.11ppg. He was the last piece of a blockbuster trade, every piece of which has been been followed obsessively night and day in a very odd - very peculiar - way for almost exactly THREE years.
So let’s all jump up and down about the spine tingling talent GMTM threw away when he traded Jack Roslovic.
It bears mentioning, in this regard, that another word often bandied about in these pages, in connection with the talent exchanged in that very trade, is “irreplaceable”.
Casey Nelson, and 30 or 40 other players that enter the ranks of professional hockey every year, makes 0.111 ppg expendable.
But please SBroads, set your text alerts to Jack (frank)ing Roslovic, and let us all know how quickly his snappy 0.111 becomes as torrid as Joel Armia’s 0.333.
Meantime I’m gonna walk the dog. - Der Kaiser
What’s Boeser’s ppg? Asking for a friend .. also “irreplaceable” stemmed from those saying kane’s Style of play was so unique that he’d be impossible to replace and we need him to win. If you just read that last sentence and thought wtf? That’s exactly what i said to those who claimed so lol
What’s Boeser’s ppg? Asking for a friend .. also “irreplaceable” stemmed from those saying kane’s Style of play was so unique that he’d be impossible to replace and we need him to win. If you just read that last sentence and thought wtf? That’s exactly what i said to those who claimed so lol - Sabresfan-365
I wonder how many true power forwards are left, at least like the power forwards of years ago, like a John LeClair.
Location: I said that months ago, keep up!, FL Joined: 03.10.2013
Jan 27 @ 10:58 AM ET
So I’m thinking of doing some research on NHL player production that will take me some time to fit into my schedule.
One aspect is to gain an understanding of what the populist definition of the following classification of players
...so help me out by providing your definition of the following categories...it may be useful to think of some in percentage or absolute numbers as appropriate for the class or group of classes(I.e. Elite is top 17% of all forwards, or 10% of 1 line forwards)
So I’m thinking of doing some research on NHL player production that will take me some time to fit into my schedule.
One aspect is to gain an understanding of what the populist definition of the following classification of players
...so help me out by providing your definition of the following categories...it may be useful to think of some in percentage or absolute numbers as appropriate for the class or group of classes(I.e. Elite is top 17% of all forwards, or 10% of 1 line forwards)
-Generational- McDavid, Crosby
-Elite- Top 10 at their respective position
-Very Good- 11-25 range at their respective position
-Good- 25-50 at their respective position
Location: ICE DIRECTOR SAYS OVER 13 THOUSAND MURDERERS CROSSED OUR BORDER ILLEGALLY OVER THE LAST 4 YEARS, FL Joined: 02.24.2008
Jan 27 @ 11:17 AM ET
So I’m thinking of doing some research on NHL player production that will take me some time to fit into my schedule.
One aspect is to gain an understanding of what the populist definition of the following classification of players
...so help me out by providing your definition of the following categories...it may be useful to think of some in percentage or absolute numbers as appropriate for the class or group of classes(I.e. Elite is top 17% of all forwards, or 10% of 1 line forwards)
-Generational
-Elite
-Very Good
-Good
Thoughts? The more the better! - IonSabres
Generational IMO would be Hasek
Elite would be Perreault, Lafontaine, Mogilny
Very good would be Briere, Satan, Vanek, Soupy, Miller
Good would be JP, Zhitnik, Risto (now, could move up), Okopso, Max etc
IMO guys like Larsson, Lehner, Bogo, etc do not belong in a chart with these terms
Location: I Know Nothink ... NOTHINK! Joined: 07.27.2007
Jan 27 @ 11:29 AM ET
What’s Boeser’s ppg? Asking for a friend .. also “irreplaceable” stemmed from those saying kane’s Style of play was so unique that he’d be impossible to replace and we need him to win. If you just read that last sentence and thought wtf? That’s exactly what i said to those who claimed so lol - Sabresfan-365
Location: We are in 30th place. It's 2017 , NY Joined: 02.12.2012
Jan 27 @ 11:43 AM ET
Casey Nelson career stats: 0.17ppg. He was an undrafted free agent. Cost to acquire: 0.00
Jack Roslovic career stats: 0.11ppg. He was the last piece of a blockbuster trade, every piece of which has been been followed obsessively night and day in a very odd - very peculiar - way for almost exactly THREE years.
So let’s all jump up and down about the spine tingling talent GMTM threw away when he traded Jack Roslovic.
It bears mentioning, in this regard, that another word often bandied about in these pages, in connection with the talent exchanged in that very trade, is “irreplaceable”.
Casey Nelson, and 30 or 40 other players that enter the ranks of professional hockey every year, makes 0.111 ppg expendable.
But please SBroads, set your text alerts to Jack (frank)ing Roslovic, and let us all know how quickly his snappy 0.111 becomes as torrid as Joel Armia’s 0.333.
Location: We are in 30th place. It's 2017 , NY Joined: 02.12.2012
Jan 27 @ 11:45 AM ET
What’s Boeser’s ppg? Asking for a friend .. also “irreplaceable” stemmed from those saying kane’s Style of play was so unique that he’d be impossible to replace and we need him to win. If you just read that last sentence and thought wtf? That’s exactly what i said to those who claimed so lol - Sabresfan-365
I cannot for the life of me figure out what Casey Nelson and Jack Roslovic have to do with each other.
Location: I said that months ago, keep up!, FL Joined: 03.10.2013
Jan 27 @ 11:51 AM ET
Generational IMO would be Hasek
Elite would be Perreault, Lafontaine, Mogilny
Very good would be Briere, Satan, Vanek, Soupy, Miller
Good would be JP, Zhitnik, Risto (now, could move up), Okopso, Max etc
IMO guys like Larsson, Lehner, Bogo, etc do not belong in a chart with these terms
my 2 cents - homiedclown
Thanks Homie.
Any thoughts in terms of qualitative input..I.e. top 10%
