Jesus where did everyone go

This place is dead-

Colorado is the #1 PK team, despite being the leagues worst face off team.... hmm
- sbroads24

They Get rid of all these "star players" and are better

Dan Patrick says on @dpshow the #Bills have contacted #Browns about No. 1 pick in draft. Was reported over the weekend #Jets called before moving up to 3. John Dorsey said to call & teams are.

Dan Patrick says on @dpshow the #Bills have contacted #Browns about No. 1 pick in draft. Was reported over the weekend #Jets called before moving up to 3. John Dorsey said to call & teams are.
- gerbe75pts

Which means they're not sold on any of these QB's either...

This sounds very familiar

Ullmark starting tonight and Okposo is back.

Which means they're not sold on any of these QB's either...

This sounds very familiar
- Stripes77

Or browns will be the browns

This place is dead-

Colorado is the #1 PK team, despite being the leagues worst face off team.... hmm
- sbroads24

out of every 100 faceoffs they lose 6 more than average

thats why its a useless stat because the league worst is barely different than average

Or browns will be the browns
- gerbe75pts

Let me ask you this...

If the Bills trade up to 1 and take Allen what does your emotions feel?

Let me ask you this...

If the Bills trade up to 1 and take Allen what does your emotions feel?
- Stripes77

My hand would most likely be broken from punching the wall

Only one quarterback has ever been successful with a 56% passer rating that is Matthew Stafford

That's basically a lottery ticket

That could get a GM fired in my opinion

i wonder what faceoff % it would take to actually make a noticeable difference

how many faceoffs won result in a goal (clean win that ends up in a goal without significant cycling, etc). lets assume 5% of faceoffs result directly in a goal without tons of noise between the faceoff and the goal.

the first result i see on google tells me theres ~60 faceoffs per game, so a 60% faceoff team is winning 6 more faceoffs than average per game.

so being a 60% faceoff team would result in .3 extra goals per game if these numbers are somewhat correct? ~1 extra goal every 3.3 games. I think thats decently significant.

Compared to carolina who leads the league at 53.8%, or 2.28 extra faceoffs won per game. Thats .114 goals per game added, 1 goal every 9 games? Prettttty much useless.

Id love to know the actual % of faceoffs that result in a goal directly. If its way higher than 5% that would make a big difference here.

i wonder what faceoff % it would take to actually make a noticeable difference

how many faceoffs won result in a goal (clean win that ends up in a goal without significant cycling, etc). lets assume 5% of faceoffs result directly in a goal without tons of noise between the faceoff and the goal.

the first result i see on google tells me theres ~60 faceoffs per game, so a 60% faceoff team is winning 6 more faceoffs than average per game.

so being a 60% faceoff team would result in .3 extra goals per game if these numbers are somewhat correct? ~1 extra goal every 3.3 games. I think thats decently significant.

Compared to carolina who leads the league at 53.8%, or 2.28 extra faceoffs won per game. Thats .114 goals per game added, 1 goal every 9 games? Prettttty much useless.

Id love to know the actual % of faceoffs that result in a goal directly. If its way higher than 5% that would make a big difference here.
- robz228

I’d be shocked if it was even 5%.

There was an article I read a while ago that said you need to win 76.5 more faceoffs than you lose to create a 1 goal difference.

Over the course of a season it’s so minuscule

I’d be shocked if it was even 5%.

There was an article I read a while ago that said you need to win 76.5 more faceoffs than you lose to create a 1 goal difference.

Over the course of a season it’s so minuscule
- sbroads24

i started out with 2% but i think the number is going to jump significantly higher on the powerplay/penalty kill which might bring it up quite a lot

because a faceoff won in the defensive zone is also a potential goal prevented, which makes a difference too

did anyone pick up casey at the airport yet?

My hand would most likely be broken from punching the wall

Only one quarterback has ever been successful with a 56% passer rating that is Matthew Stafford

That's basically a lottery ticket

That could get a GM fired in my opinion
- gerbe75pts

That's all I needed to know...broken hand means you can't type

Beane go move to 1 and take Allen!!



Couldn't help myself

did anyone pick up casey at the airport yet?
- IndianaSabresFan

Jagr picked him up for lunch with Terry

That's all I needed to know...broken hand means you can't type

Beane go move to 1 and take Allen!!



Couldn't help myself
- Stripes77

That has to be a smoke screen there's no way he's going to take a guy that has a 56% passer rating and very little success rate in the NFL

This is just like that Ryan Nassib bs

did anyone pick up casey at the airport yet?
- IndianaSabresFan

I guess we're waiting to the summertime I don't want to burn a year of his contract

That has to be a smoke screen there's no way he's going to take a guy that has a 56% passer rating and very little success rate in the NFL

This is just like that Ryan Nassib bs
- gerbe75pts

Marrone coached Nassib at Cuse, that's where that came from

Marrone coached Nassib at Cuse, that's where that came from
- Stripes77

The media pumped him up and NFL analyst we're believing it and putting him in the first round

quite laughable

Yeah, that's the road I was trying to type. I should've thought of typing "D1ck" ... Damn.
- kritter65

An upside-down "!" works too "¡" looks a lot like an "i" d¡ck. If you have a Mac it's alt-1. if it's windows it's some crazy combo, and you're on your own.

Sure. Why not. Send the invite to my yahoo.
- TheSabresTaco

Sent!