|
|
What % are the first unit PP operating at since Brock got injured? - VANTEL
bad but so was PP2 when Boeser was on it with Horvat |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
bad but so was PP2 when Boeser was on it with Horvat - johnnykarate
this 100%
again, people can't argue with the actual goal %
bo/horvat benefit from the sedins playmaking and the sedins benefit from their scoring
people can choose to buy into one side of the sorry, but that's the truth.
But the Sedins 5v5 liability is too much of an anchor. |
|
Lindenis#1
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: he's (frank)in unstable so mrs dt is freaking out, AB Joined: 07.22.2007
|
|
|
Stech is not worth 2 mil - VANTEL
He's easily worth 2 mil. He's better than MDZ and Gudbranson if they could combine into a single slow bad player.
I'd put 2.5mx5y in front of him and see if he takes it. Finally get a positive value contract on the team. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
He's easily worth 2 mil. He's better than MDZ and Gudbranson if they could combine into a single slow bad player.
I'd put 2.5mx5y in front of him and see if he takes it. Finally get a positive value contract on the team. - Lindenis#1
Bo
I don’t mind Stetcher as a 3rd pairing dman |
|
Lindenis#1
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: he's (frank)in unstable so mrs dt is freaking out, AB Joined: 07.22.2007
|
|
|
Bo
I don’t mind Stetcher as a 3rd pairing dman - Nucker101
Bo's getting paid for what he's worth. We'll see if he outperforms it in a year or two.
Stecher is second pairing guy as long as he's not being asked to carry that second pair. So like a #4 or top notch 5 |
|
dbot
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down Joined: 10.22.2008
|
|
|
Stech is not worth 2 mil - VANTEL
I think his agent would be able to argue that he is worth that on this team. |
|
neem55
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 02.02.2012
|
|
|
Bo's getting paid for what he's worth. We'll see if he outperforms it in a year or two.
Stecher is second pairing guy as long as he's not being asked to carry that second pair. So like a #4 or top notch 5 - Lindenis#1
I like Stecher, but this is not accurate right now. |
|
dbot
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down Joined: 10.22.2008
|
|
|
this 100%
again, people can't argue with the actual goal %
bo/horvat benefit from the sedins playmaking and the sedins benefit from their scoring
people can choose to buy into one side of the sorry, but that's the truth.
But the Sedins 5v5 liability is too much of an anchor. - Nucker101
this makes some sense to me. |
|
|
|
I think his agent would be able to argue that he is worth that on this team. - dbot
I like Stecher but if I had to choose Stecher at 2-2.5 or Weirchioch at 1 , I would take the latter . |
|
Lindenis#1
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: he's (frank)in unstable so mrs dt is freaking out, AB Joined: 07.22.2007
|
|
|
I like Stecher but if I had to choose Stecher at 2-2.5 or Weirchioch at 1 , I would take the latter . - VANTEL
That is (frank)ing insanity. |
|
|
|
That is (frank)ing insanity. - Lindenis#1
Weirchioch is having a good year . He has way more points/goals than Stecher |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Weirchioch is having a good year . He has way more points/goals than Stecher - VANTEL
He’s been tossed aside by multiple teams who had poop dmen groups
Stetcher would probably be Utica’s best offensive player |
|
neem55
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 02.02.2012
|
|
|
Weirchioch is having a good year . He has way more points/goals than Stecher - VANTEL
The knock on him is he's a defensive liability. We have enough of those. |
|
|
|
He’s been tossed aside by multiple teams who had poop dmen groups
Stetcher would probably be Utica’s best offensive player - Nucker101
He is not a 2 mil Dman
|
|
|
|
The knock on him is he's a defensive liability. We have enough of those. - neem55
I don't look at Hutton Puliot or Stecher long term . All three need to be better |
|
Eldebrink
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Port Compton, BC Joined: 08.18.2016
|
|
|
Fine....
#SuckForTkachuk - EnzoD
|
|
neem55
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 02.02.2012
|
|
|
I don't look at Hutton Puliot or Stecher long term . All three need to be better - VANTEL
Wiercoch is what 27? The three guys you just mentioned are clearly apart of the future plans. You've got it backwards. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
He is not a 2 mil Dman - VANTEL
Stecher shoots muffins. Need to have a decent shot from the point. His is lacking. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Stecher shoots muffins. Need to have a decent shot from the point. His is lacking. - manvanfan
Not a lot of teams have 3-4 guys who can really shoot from the point. You can have guys like Edler/Tanev/Stetcher and have 1-2 guys who can actually shoot and still be solid. |
|
dbot
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down Joined: 10.22.2008
|
|
|
Weirchioch is having a good year . He has way more points/goals than Stecher - VANTEL
in a different league
Boucher is pretty good for Utica too...not so much in the NHL. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Wiercoch is what 27? The three guys you just mentioned are clearly apart of the future plans. You've got it backwards. - neem55
yeah, I don't see the point in moving Stetcher. Not like the team has much better coming up in Utica.
He's also one of the few guys on this team who can play up tempo hockey. |
|
Lindenis#1
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: he's (frank)in unstable so mrs dt is freaking out, AB Joined: 07.22.2007
|
|
|
He is not a 2 mil Dman - VANTEL
Nathan Beaulieu gets 2.4. Ryan Murray sucks and gets a shade under 3. Lindell is taking home 2.2. Schmidt was in a similar spot when he signed for like 2.7 or whatever.
Performance based, those are good comparables. Tons of pooptier players get paid more. Somehow Derek Forbort is getting himself like 2.5 a year on his new deal. Gunnarsson is somehow a 2.9 million dollar player. Hutton is getting 2.8. |
|
dbot
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down Joined: 10.22.2008
|
|
|
Wiercoch is what 27? The three guys you just mentioned are clearly apart of the future plans. You've got it backwards. - neem55
i totally thought he was about 10 years older than that. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Nathan Beaulieu gets 2.4. Ryan Murray sucks and gets a shade under 3. Lindell is taking home 2.2. Schmidt was in a similar spot when he signed for like 2.7 or whatever.
Performance based, those are good comparables. Tons of pooptier players get paid more. Somehow Derek Forbort is getting himself like 2.5 a year on his new deal. Gunnarsson is somehow a 2.9 million dollar player. Hutton is getting 2.8. - Lindenis#1
MDZ and Gudbranson.. |
|
dbot
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down Joined: 10.22.2008
|
|
|
yeah, I don't see the point in moving Stetcher. Not like the team has much better coming up in Utica.
He's also one of the few guys on this team who can play up tempo hockey. - Nucker101
this.
i'm fine with cutting ties with Hutton and keeping Stetcher.
i'm on the fence with Pouliot. |
|