We need to rebuild. Add via free agency or look at spezza.

Giving up assets at this stage is stupidest poop ever. We should be dealing guys for extra picks not once again giving up picks for players who wont be here in a couple years... benning and linden need to be fired.
- mauryballstein

I don't agree.

Spezza Bozak Sutter are not top 6 centers
- VANTEL

I would be fine with getting O reilly, if it is a deal that involves any of Sutter Tanev Granlund Baertschi Hutton Markstrom Nilsson Erickson.
Maybe they want us to take on Moulson, they could add a 4th or something.

agree. get more assets in the bank first.

take a look at some of the ones we have first too (unless we're convinced they're busts and they'll be exposed, lessening their trade value)
- BobBot

We can call up Chaput and no assets given up

That's what I mean, it's dangerous.
- Marwood

Yes it is.

We can call up Chaput and no assets given up
- VANTEL

Is Magma still in the system?

I would be fine with getting O reilly, if it is a deal that involves any of Sutter Tanev Granlund Baertschi Hutton Markstrom Nilsson Erickson.
Maybe they want us to take on Moulson, they could add a 4th or something.
- Reubenkincade

They can buy out MM.

Not sure they have interest in Granlund Baertschi Hutton or any other garbage

Is Magma still in the system?
- storm88

UFA

They can buy out MM.

Not sure they have interest in Granlund Baertschi Hutton or any other garbage
- VANTEL

I think Granlund is more valuable than we think. talking 3rd line. We could do worse.

UFA
- VANTEL

It was quite a ride.

It was quite a ride.
- storm88

They can buy out MM.

Not sure they have interest in Granlund Baertschi Hutton or any other garbage
- VANTEL

You ruined my day.😁

J.D. Burke Retweeted TSN Radio Vancouver
Ryan O’Reilly is the player that the Canucks think Brandon Sutter is. Have to wonder if any interest in O’Reilly portends another move to send Sutter out of town, or perhaps back Buffalo’s way.

Exactly what I was thinking. an upgrade on Sutter
- VANTEL

Mixed opinions on O'reilly's contract

some think his contract has no value and would be a cap dump
some think he should get a return

I have no idea.

Mixed opinions on O'reilly's contract

some think his contract has no value and would be a cap dump
some think he should get a return

I have no idea.
- classic321

If Sutter is part of the package it is a 3 mil increase for an upgrade for the next 3 years. This is quite acceptable. His contract ends when he is 32 and you may want to look at moving him at 30 when he has value still

I would be fine with getting O reilly, if it is a deal that involves any of Sutter Tanev Granlund Baertschi Hutton Markstrom Nilsson Erickson.
Maybe they want us to take on Moulson, they could add a 4th or something.
- Reubenkincade

Tanev is it

After that you won’t be getting ROR for any of those pieces unless you throw in something you probably don’t want to ....just think of what other nhl teams would offer for ROR and then ask yourself if you’d rather that or granlund Hutton markstrom

If Sutter is part of the package it is a 3 mil increase for an upgrade for the next 3 years. This is quite acceptable. His contract ends when he is 32 and you may want to look at moving him at 30 when he has value still
- VANTEL

If Sutter is part then who is the main part ?

Sutter
Demko
2nd

For
ROR
5th

Or

Tanev
Sutter
Top prospect

For

ROR
Reinhardt

If Sutter is part of the package it is a 3 mil increase for an upgrade for the next 3 years. This is quite acceptable. His contract ends when he is 32 and you may want to look at moving him at 30 when he has value still
- VANTEL

PERFECT time for a contract to end.
32-34

It makes me laugh thinking about Parise who still has 7 years left @ $7.6 million and his contract ends when he is 41.
I swear it feels like parise signed that contract a million years ago.

If Sutter is part of the package it is a 3 mil increase for an upgrade for the next 3 years. This is quite acceptable. His contract ends when he is 32 and you may want to look at moving him at 30 when he has value still
- VANTEL

This team is not getting better via trades. Sucking and hopefully adding draft picks should be next years plan.

This team is not getting better via trades. Sucking and hopefully adding draft picks should be next years plan.
- A_SteamingLombardi

This teams goal should be trying to get another 1st round pick in 2019 at all costs.

Hosting the draft and having two firsts would be great PR

This teams goal should be trying to get another 1st round pick in 2019 at all costs.

Hosting the draft and having two firsts would be great PR
- classic321

Edler or Tanev out at TDL

This teams goal should be trying to get another 1st round pick in 2019 at all costs.

Hosting the draft and having two firsts would be great PR
- classic321

- Nucker101

It was what it was.

It was what it was.
- A_SteamingLombardi

Ehlers and Pastrnak


oh wait...

Canucks need a second line center for this upcoming year . Who is offering one up?
- VANTEL

Ya, I dunno.

Sign a UFA?
Maybe one presents itself after July 1st for trade.

i just don't think the Canucks are well positioned to offer what ROR would cost (in terms of picks/prospects).

I'd be down to trade Sutter + (not Demko, OJ, 7th OA etc etc)
or Tanev straight up.

I would be fine with getting O reilly, if it is a deal that involves any of Sutter Tanev Granlund Baertschi Hutton Markstrom Nilsson Erickson.
Maybe they want us to take on Moulson, they could add a 4th or something.
- Reubenkincade

Same page.

Sutter, Granlund and Hutton for ROR plus Moulson. Capspace move for Buffalo, plus adds some depth.

or

Tanev for ROR

If Sutter is part then who is the main part ?

Sutter
Demko
2nd

For
ROR
5th

Or

Tanev
Sutter
Top prospect

For

ROR
Reinhardt
- Redmile247

1st trade = Too much from Vancouver IMO.

2nd option - would really depend on the prospect.
Not big on Reinhardt