RickJames77
Boston Bruins |
|
|
Location: We’re Too Old, Boston Joined: 04.03.2013
|
|
|
Can I at least wash it first? - .OHOH.
|
|
bobbyisno1
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: I'm excited to see that Joined: 08.28.2010
|
|
|
Can I at least watch it first? - .OHOH.
Fixed |
|
Unholy_Goalie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: usually UG offends everyone by telling the truth - dt99999, ON Joined: 08.23.2006
|
|
|
Didn't karlsson say he wouldn't take less than he is worth? No discounts.
Didn't doughty just sign for 11mil?
Why would karlsson sign for a discount after he said he wouldnt? Especially with a team he has no connection with. - burn
500K less per year is barely a discount. And why would he take it? To get out of Ottawa and onto a good team that can give him all the up front signing bonus money he wants.
Either way, there's still space available to give him the extra 500K if it was absolutely necessary. |
|
Unholy_Goalie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: usually UG offends everyone by telling the truth - dt99999, ON Joined: 08.23.2006
|
|
|
We got a live one
Max is Plantheparade and now who are you? Hmmm... - RickJames77
Pen15 = Puck-Us-All. Possibly Buck Norris too. |
|
Unholy_Goalie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: usually UG offends everyone by telling the truth - dt99999, ON Joined: 08.23.2006
|
|
|
If leafs have a good year next season, why would Marleau be okay with going somewhere like Arizona for his last season? Seems like wishful thinking, Marleau will play out his full contract in Toronto and that third year will probably make things pretty tight. - ClarksonDavid
Agree- he will play out the deal, and he earned his pay last season. Pretty sure both the Leafs and Marleau are happy with the deal at this point. - winsix
For sure, Marleau didn't come here to be traded to some poop team as we get contenderish. - Garnie
Because the contract was clearly designed for him to retire in the 3rd year after he gets his 3 million dollar signing bonus.
And even if he doesn't retire, he still fits under the cap as he was included in the calculations if any of you cared to look.
It still works either way. |
|
Unholy_Goalie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: usually UG offends everyone by telling the truth - dt99999, ON Joined: 08.23.2006
|
|
|
1. Karlsson will demand more thatn $10.5 AAV on the open market. Why would he give Toronto a discount? - Pen15
He's not better than Doughty. He still fits if he wants 11 instead of 10.5
2. Matthews is considered a generational player. As a result, his comparable is McDavid. If he puts up a monster year this year playing against 2nd pairing Dmen he will definitely be in line for $11 AAV.
Matthews hasn't won (frank) all other than the Calder. He's not as good as McDavid nor should he be paid like McDavid.
3. What if Marleau doesn't retire?
Still fits.
4. Reality - whether you want to admit it or not - is not on your side. Nothwithstanding that Dubas is on record stating that he will KEEP THE CORE TOGETHER.
Move on.
If Nylander and Gardiner get 6 million each, that's 12 million. 12 > 11. And they'll probably get 10 million each the way you seem to think Matthews and Marner should get paid.
Move on to a new account and agree with yourself again. |
|
Unholy_Goalie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: usually UG offends everyone by telling the truth - dt99999, ON Joined: 08.23.2006
|
|
|
Your salaries are little outta wack.
1- you are not getting a 4th line at that price of 750K - I think you need to go with the league minimum which is around 1.2m
2- Marner will be in the 8 mil range
3- Matthews will near what Tavares is getting so add 1.5 mil there.
4. lucky if you are able to get one at that price but you risk of tiring out your main goalie
If Horton is still on the Leafs payroll and sent to the LITR, the Leafs might be able to squeeze by but they'll be in a situation where they may not be able to call up a player cause they'll be over the cap. - zazzle
If league minimum is 1.2M how did Ennis get 650K?
Again, there's still cap room to fit in those extra 500K differences some players may or may not have. There's also the option to trade Hyman or Brown and open up 2 million to spread around to whoever needs it.
Matthews isn't a UFA and won't have the negotiating power that Tavares had. What team is going to surrender 4 1st round picks to give him that kind of offer? And even if a team did, there's space to fit him and match it. |
|
Scabeh
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: The Slovakian Jagr, QC Joined: 02.25.2007
|
|
|
5 posts in a row UG? That's quite the backread. |
|
.OHOH.
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Joined: 07.30.2017
|
|
|
500K less per year is barely a discount. And why would he take it? To get out of Ottawa and onto a good team that can give him all the up front signing bonus money he wants.
Either way, there's still space available to give him the extra 500K if it was absolutely necessary. - Unholy_Goalie
Wrong |
|
Unholy_Goalie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: usually UG offends everyone by telling the truth - dt99999, ON Joined: 08.23.2006
|
|
|
5 posts in a row UG? That's quite the backread. - Scabeh
Karlsson's worth it. |
|
.OHOH.
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Joined: 07.30.2017
|
|
|
Pen15 = Puck-Us-All. Possibly Buck Norris too. - Unholy_Goalie
Wrong |
|
.OHOH.
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Joined: 07.30.2017
|
|
|
Because the contract was clearly designed for him to retire in the 3rd year after he gets his 3 million dollar signing bonus.
And even if he doesn't retire, he still fits under the cap as he was included in the calculations if any of you cared to look.
It still works either way. - Unholy_Goalie
Wrong |
|
.OHOH.
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Joined: 07.30.2017
|
|
|
He's not better than Doughty. He still fits if he wants 11 instead of 10.5
Matthews hasn't won (frank) all other than the Calder. He's not as good as McDavid nor should he be paid like McDavid.
Still fits.
If Nylander and Gardiner get 6 million each, that's 12 million. 12 > 11. And they'll probably get 10 million each the way you seem to think Matthews and Marner should get paid.
Move on to a new account and agree with yourself again. - Unholy_Goalie
Wrong
|
|
Unholy_Goalie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: usually UG offends everyone by telling the truth - dt99999, ON Joined: 08.23.2006
|
|
|
Wrong - .OHOH.
Says the guy wanting to ban anyone who replies to my posts, then replies to my post with an alt.
Outstanding work. |
|
.OHOH.
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Joined: 07.30.2017
|
|
|
If league minimum is 1.2M how did Ennis get 650K?
Again, there's still cap room to fit in those extra 500K differences some players may or may not have. There's also the option to trade Hyman or Brown and open up 2 million to spread around to whoever needs it.
Matthews isn't a UFA and won't have the negotiating power that Tavares had. What team is going to surrender 4 1st round picks to give him that kind of offer? And even if a team did, there's space to fit him and match it. - Unholy_Goalie
Wrong |
|
TrashPanda
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Your Green Bin, ON Joined: 03.29.2018
|
|
|
5 posts in a row UG? That's quite the backread. - Scabeh
The attention whoring is strong with this one. |
|
.OHOH.
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Joined: 07.30.2017
|
|
|
Because the contract was clearly designed for him to retire in the 3rd year after he gets his 3 million dollar signing bonus.
And even if he doesn't retire, he still fits under the cap as he was included in the calculations if any of you cared to look.
It still works either way. - Unholy_Goalie
Wrong
|
|
Scabeh
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: The Slovakian Jagr, QC Joined: 02.25.2007
|
|
|
Karlsson's worth it. - Unholy_Goalie
I can feel him getting closer to the Leafs as we speak!
Your hard work won't be for nothing! |
|
Atomic Wedgie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: The centre of the hockey universe Joined: 07.31.2006
|
|
|
500K less per year is barely a discount. And why would he take it? To get out of Ottawa and onto a good team that can give him all the up front signing bonus money he wants.
Either way, there's still space available to give him the extra 500K if it was absolutely necessary. - Unholy_Goalie
But $11 million with Toronto is waaaaaaay less than $11 million with Tampa because of taxes.
0.00% chance he comes to Toronto. |
|
Unholy_Goalie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: usually UG offends everyone by telling the truth - dt99999, ON Joined: 08.23.2006
|
|
|
I can feel him getting closer to the Leafs as we speak!
Your hard work won't be for nothing! - Scabeh
Probably won't happen, but it should. The Leafs desperately need a top pairing RHD and Karlsson is available. Guys like Karlsson are almost never available like this. And Ottawa has little to no leverage. He'd be a bargain by comparison.
As it stands now, Tampa Bay has Hedman, McDonagh and Sergachev. The Leafs adding Karlsson makes a huge difference to bridge that gap. Karlsson is a player who can and has won a playoff series by himself.
We've seen the impact players like Pronger and Niedermayer have made when they join their new teams. Literally straight to the Cup Finals and/or Stanley Cup victories. Every single multi-time Norris winner has won a Cup. Every Norris winner in the past 30 years has won a Cup or gone to the Finals.
This should be a no-brainer. If Yzerman wants Karlsson (and thinks he can fit him), Shanahan should be all over it. |
|
Unholy_Goalie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: usually UG offends everyone by telling the truth - dt99999, ON Joined: 08.23.2006
|
|
|
But $11 million with Toronto is waaaaaaay less than $11 million with Tampa because of taxes.
0.00% chance he comes to Toronto. - Atomic Wedgie
He has Salming pajamas and a Sundin bed spread.
100% chance he loves Toronto. |
|
Scabeh
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: The Slovakian Jagr, QC Joined: 02.25.2007
|
|
|
Probably won't happen, but it should. The Leafs desperately need a top pairing RHD and Karlsson is available. Guys like Karlsson are almost never available like this. And Ottawa has little to no leverage. He'd be a bargain by comparison.
As it stands now, Tampa Bay has Hedman, McDonagh and Sergachev. The Leafs adding Karlsson makes a huge difference to bridge that gap. Karlsson is a player who can and has won a playoff series by himself.
We've seen the impact players like Pronger and Niedermayer have made when they join their new teams. Literally straight to the Cup Finals and/or Stanley Cup victories. Every single multi-time Norris winner has won a Cup. Every Norris winner in the past 30 years has won a Cup for gone to the Finals.
This should be a no-brainer. If Yzerman wants Karlsson (and thinks he can fit him), Shanahan should be all over it. - Unholy_Goalie
I'm sure the Leafs have interest.
But we have no idea what the price would be or if Ottawa would even consider trading him to their hated rivals.
Remember that they took a lesser deal because they didn't want to trade Hoffman to the (frank)ing Panthers.
I understand what you mean but you admitting it probably won't happen pretty much means you and everyone else actually agree.... yet the argument lives on... why is that? |
|
.OHOH.
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Joined: 07.30.2017
|
|
|
I understand what you mean but you admitting it probably won't happen pretty much means you and everyone else actually agree.... yet the argument lives on... why is that? - Scabeh
Because I'm a lonely soul that needs to take a contrarian and argumentative point of view to get people to engage me in conversation.
Translation... Because I'm an argumentative little female genitalia. - Unholy_Goalie
|
|
TrashPanda
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Your Green Bin, ON Joined: 03.29.2018
|
|
|
But $11 million with Toronto is waaaaaaay less than $11 million with Tampa because of taxes.
0.00% chance he comes to Toronto. - Atomic Wedgie
There is exactly the same chance he goes to Tampa. Anyone suggesting otherwise is spewing some Grade A bullpoop. |
|
Unholy_Goalie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: usually UG offends everyone by telling the truth - dt99999, ON Joined: 08.23.2006
|
|
|
I'm sure the Leafs have interest.
But we have no idea what the price would be or if Ottawa would even consider trading him to their hated rivals.
Remember that they took a lesser deal because they didn't want to trade Hoffman to the (frank)ing Panthers.
I understand what you mean but you admitting it probably won't happen pretty much means you and everyone else agree.... yet the argument lives on... why is that? - Scabeh
I agree that trading within the division was a problem for them with Hoffman but clearly they don't have a problem with dealing him to Tampa Bay, so why the Leafs?
At this point, the Senators are looking for the best deal they can get to improve their team and play their way out of a lottery pick for Colorado. Nylander and Gardiner can give them quality players, one of them still young enough to grow and the other to play on the blueline and eat up some of the minutes lost by Karlsson. Plus a 1st round pick, which as of now, they don't have.
If the offers are poop from the other teams and Karlsson doesn't want to play for them this season or sign an extension, trading him to the Leafs for a good package becomes a more intriguing option.
The point is that he can fit under the cap and that it would benefit the Leafs. The reasons some people are providing are wrong. Nylander and Gardiner aren't going to re-sign for free. The cap is still going to be an issue but at least with Karlsson, you have a Norris winning RHD. It's clearly a better move for the Leafs. |
|