|
|
Which 3? Byram is a LHD - Nighthawk
Byram is LHD.
Helleson
Guenette
McCarthy
These 3 are RHD second round |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
We are not the Habs or Yotes šš - Nighthawk
Thank the lord for that.
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Ok back to saying BPA & not reaching.
Thatās out of left field. We are most likely to be picking high & a C will be there. Hughes Cozens Newhook better than any winger unless Podkolzin keeps rocketing up. Krebs maybe but RHD just isnāt there. So if BPA is a hard & fast rule who decides what BPA list to use? |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Byram is LHD.
Helleson
Guenette
McCarthy
These 3 are RHD second round - VANTEL
I thought he was quite aways behind the other D at Hlinka Gretzky tournament.
Kaeden Korczak in Kelowna might be a player in the middle rounds. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Ok back to saying BPA & not reaching.
Thatās out of left field. We are most likely to be picking high & a C will be there. Hughes Cozens Newhook better than any winger unless Podkolzin keeps rocketing up. Krebs maybe but RHD just isnāt there. So if BPA is a hard & fast rule who decides what BPA list to use? - Nighthawk
The one that JB, Brackett, Weisbrod and the rest of the scouts come up with. |
|
|
|
Ok back to saying BPA & not reaching.
Thatās out of left field. We are most likely to be picking high & a C will be there. Hughes Cozens Newhook better than any winger unless Podkolzin keeps rocketing up. Krebs maybe but RHD just isnāt there. So if BPA is a hard & fast rule who decides what BPA list to use? - Nighthawk
I think what Habs and Arizona did this year was a huge mistake . Passing up on Zadina or Hughes for Kotkaniemi and Hayton is stupid |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
I think what Habs and Arizona did this year was a huge mistake . Passing up on Zadina or Hughes for Kotkaniemi and Hayton is stupid - VANTEL
I predicted the Habs take Kot for need cuz MB is an idiot & I suggested trading down. He either got nervous heād lose Kot or is as bad as i claim. As for Hayton same thing. |
|
|
|
I predicted the Habs take Kot for need cuz MB is an idiot & I suggested trading down. He either got nervous heād lose Kot or is as bad as i claim. As for Hayton same thing. - Nighthawk
Arizona would have taken him at 5
|
|
|
|
I think what Habs and Arizona did this year was a huge mistake . Passing up on Zadina or Hughes for Kotkaniemi and Hayton is stupid - VANTEL
Iām not say it was smart but there was a shortage of top centres in this draft. I knew there would be a couple GMās doing something stupid. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
I predicted the Habs take Kot for need cuz MB is an idiot & I suggested trading down. He either got nervous heād lose Kot or is as bad as i claim. As for Hayton same thing. - Nighthawk
Recent first round picks from Finland.
Liiga PTS in GP (best season in nhl)
Laine 33 in 46 (70 pts)
JP 28 in 50 (20 pts)
Armia 29 in 48 (29 pts)
Teravainen 18 in 40 (64 pts)
Barkov 48 in 53 (78 pts)
Kapanen 14 in 47 (9 pts)
Rantanen 28 in 56 (84 pts NHL season)
Kotkaniemi 29 in 57 (TBD)
Kupari 14 in 39 (TBD) |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Iām not say it was smart but there was a shortage of top centres in this draft. I knew there would be a couple GMās doing something stupid. - thundachunk
JB is rising up the GM rankings!
|
|
|
|
20 top wingers
|
|
|
|
20 top wingers
- VANTEL
Expectations are high. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Expectations are realistic. - thundachunk
fixed |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Expectations are high. - thundachunk
āFan voteā is the key here
Virtanen |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Somebody is just altering it. The center version had Jay Beagle on it. Even though correct. - manvanfan
Oh lol
I just assumed Canuck fans trolled Sportsnet.
Either way, any ātop listā decided by fan vote is pointless |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Oh lol
I just assumed Canuck fans trolled Sportsnet.
Either way, any ātop listā decided by fan vote is pointless - Nucker101
There are smart hockey fans. Not many but some. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
There are smart hockey fans. Not many but some. - manvanfan
For sure, but throw up an online poll where you can vote anonymously and I bet 90% of fans go full homer/hater mode. |
|
Makita
Referee Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: #theonlyrealfan, BC Joined: 02.16.2007
|
|
|
Off the head out to 650 ft.
Asphalt or concrete? - A_SteamingLombardi
screenings tamped with a diesel plate, driveway is 3800 square feet. I would love asphalt or concrete....but Iām not an engineer working in Oman |
|
BobBot
Season Ticket Holder Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Joined: 01.17.2017
|
|
|
aren't Giroux and Rakell centers?
Boeser
so many Wilson fanboys |
|
|
|
There are smart hockey fans. Not many but some. - manvanfan
Thanks. |
|
|
|
Ok back to saying BPA & not reaching.
Thatās out of left field. We are most likely to be picking high & a C will be there. Hughes Cozens Newhook better than any winger unless Podkolzin keeps rocketing up. Krebs maybe but RHD just isnāt there. So if BPA is a hard & fast rule who decides what BPA list to use? - Nighthawk
I think many of us here have discussed this with you previously, it is the list that each seperate team has.
If Arizona, for example, has Barrett Hayton, at 4th, and he happens too be available at 5th OA, then they take him.
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Arizona would have taken him at 5 - VANTEL
It would appear so but IMO neither were good enough for top 5. Habs for need at 3 was a reach. Needing scoring said Zadina or Tkachuk so iād trade down. Kot at 5 for the Yotes would be less of a reach. It wasnāt a good set up for prospects for either team. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Oh lol
I just assumed Canuck fans trolled Sportsnet.
Either way, any ātop listā decided by fan vote is pointless - Nucker101
Popularity voting so its hardly the best lol |
|