Seeing it several times. I wouldn't have challenged it. Too close to really say
- senstroll

So after finding out the war rooms decision you wouldn't have challenged is what you're saying.

Babcock should've said the Nashville Predators challenge that goal for offside
- walshyleafsfan

OFFSIDE!!!

Seeing it several times. I wouldn't have challenged it. Too close to really say
- senstroll

Both feet inside the blueline without touching the puck. Wasn’t any closer than other we’ve had overturned

Garbage

We all know if Toronto scored that goal it would've been called back. So dumb...
- LeafGuy89

Yep. And they would’ve got a penalty somehow.

That was close enough that Babs should've have challenged that... on the flipside, since it is that close, a penalty is kinda (frank)ing harsh.

We all know if Toronto scored that goal it would've been called back. So dumb...
- LeafGuy89

I don't believe there's a conspiracy but the leafs seemed to be on the wrong end of a lot of goalie interference calls last year.

Dermott Rielly

Cause it wasnt clear.
Puck was edge.

Has to be 100% clear
- Fakepartofme

When it showed the camera angle from the blue line it was even more clear it was offside.

Ahh well what can ya do..

Cause it wasnt clear.
Puck was edge.

Has to be 100% clear
- Fakepartofme

It was clear on edge doesn’t matter is was a foot away from the blueline.

Brutal miss. Why have review “to get it right” and (frank) it up that bad on easy call

Challenge everytime imo.

The Leafs have had a handful pulled back that were just as close
- walshyleafsfan

Oh if it's against the leafs. Then yes challenge everything

Babcock is the king of offsides.

Matthews looking good tonight. But because he hasn’t scored, the usual people will claim he’s been invisible.

I don't believe there's a conspiracy but the leafs seemed to be on the wrong end of a lot of goalie interference calls last year.
- HealthyScratch6

They're on the wrong end of PP calls too.

Somebody posted a graph and because we haven't taken as many penalties, we're not getting as many PPs... so basically reffing is a complete BS popularity contest.

So when exactly are we replacing the zebras with robots?

Both feet inside the blueline without touching the puck. Wasn’t any closer than other we’ve had overturned

Garbage
- burn

Blue line view was obstructed and they didn't have a frame showing the skates in and the puck out. One frame had both skates and puck on the line next frame they were both inside. The call on the ice was not offside not conclusive proof to overturn it.

So after finding out the war rooms decision you wouldn't have challenged is what you're saying.
- HealthyScratch6

After watching the replay 10 times. It didn't look clear enough to see. Is what I'm saying.

I am just not sure how many views Babs had before having go make the call

When it showed the camera angle from the blue line it was even more clear it was offside.

Ahh well what can ya do..
- LeafGuy89

Puck was on edge, you couldnt see 100% so they have to leave it as is.

Babcock is the king of offsides.
- AdamFrench

That was close enough that Babs should've have challenged that... on the flipside, since it is that close, a penalty is kinda (frank)ing harsh.
- gravyface

do they keep their timeout?

They're on the wrong end of PP calls too.

Somebody posted a graph and because we haven't taken as many penalties, we're not getting as many PPs... so basically reffing is a complete BS popularity contest.

So when exactly are we replacing the zebras with robots?
- gravyface

The notion that one of the quickest most skilled teams don’t draw penalties is a joke. The leafs don’t take penalties so they don’t get calls. It’s assine.

I'm making a pizza. Would someone like to tell my cat that she doesn't really want a mushroom?

Matthews looking good tonight. But because he hasn’t scored, the usual people will claim he’s been invisible.
- Steven_Seagull

Indeeedie.
Aetheriaaaaaaaal

After watching the replay 10 times. It didn't look clear enough to see. Is what I'm saying.

I am just not sure how many views Babs had before having go make the call
- senstroll

Yeah I agree with you I'm just (frank)ing with you. He probably got two or 3 looks at it on an iPad. Had to challenge it.

Puck was on edge, you couldnt see 100% so they have to leave it as is.
- Fakepartofme

The puck was a foot from the line, on edge is meaningless.

It was clear as day

FIRST! Gull out!


- Dongull_Trump

They're on the wrong end of PP calls too.

Somebody posted a graph and because we haven't taken as many penalties, we're not getting as many PPs... so basically reffing is a complete BS popularity contest.

So when exactly are we replacing the zebras with robots?
- gravyface

Never.
We dont take as many penalties cause we have soft players who arent physical.
But seriously, the team overall isnt very physical or chippy....so less opportunity to get a penalty

Usually