Panarin won't happen and I am not a fan of Myers . Would like Duchene
- VANTEL

Colorado could give up the 4th overall and Jost + + for Malkin?

that would be a good avatar.
- bloatedmosquito

It's like someone has a gun to his dog's head.

Colorado could give up the 4th overall and Jost + + for Malkin?
- Pacificgem

I don't see that .

I don't see that .
- VANTEL

Much a do about nothing probably, MacKinnon/Malkin pretty good centers for Sakic though.

Much a do about nothing probably, MacKinnon/Malkin pretty good centers for Sakic though.
- Pacificgem

I would trade the 2020 first which probably won't be top 12 but i would not do this years top 10

He is 32 .

Colorado could give up the 4th overall and Jost + + for Malkin?
- Pacificgem

WOW a 32 yr old who has never had to be "the man" with 3 yrs at 9.5 mil left, the return won't be as high as you think

WOW a 32 yr old who has never had to be "the man" with 3 yrs at 9.5 mil left, the return won't be as high as you think
- onesmallleap

I could see Colorado saying Jost and their first but not Ottawa's first

WOW a 32 yr old who has never had to be "the man" with 3 yrs at 9.5 mil left, the return won't be as high as you think
- onesmallleap

He’s been the man plenty, especially in the playoffs, Conn Smythe, Art Ross, Hart, Ted Lindsay, Calder, etc. etc.

I just don’t see them trading him unless the return was great. Even at 32 he put up good numbers this year, 72 points in 68 games, I think 41 goals 98 points the year before.

I could see Colorado saying Jost and their first but not Ottawa's first
- VANTEL

i just don't see them wanting to disrupt it being MacKinnons team by bringing in a front line ageing centre

just for fun , imagine what TO could get if they sent Mattews to Arizona and then brought in Malkin

I could see Colorado saying Jost and their first but not Ottawa's first
- VANTEL

That would make more sense.

Botchford said the only other player the Canucks considered at #5 in 2017 was Maker, damn that kids good.

WOW a 32 yr old who has never had to be "the man" with 3 yrs at 9.5 mil left, the return won't be as high as you think
- onesmallleap

I mean, he’s actually played better when Crosby was injured according to Pens fans so I think he’d be just fine “as the guy” but issue is that he’s on the decline and has a history of injuries to boot

I wouldn’t buy too much into the Ek rumour, he’d been banging the trade Malkin drum for years

Botchford said the only other player the Canucks considered at #5 in 2017 was Maker, damn that kids good.
- Pacificgem

5 points already this playoff! Sees the ice so well.

5 points already this playoff! Sees the ice so well.
- Shuswap Wap

So skilled and not tentative at all. High compete level.

5 points already this playoff! Sees the ice so well.
- Shuswap Wap

I wonder how many Hughes will have next year?

Really?

I figured there'd be some regrets there.
The team you made a major trade with is going to the Conference finals, while your team is out in 5 games.


- dbot

They changed their goalies, added several new forwards through draft, development, and trades, added a d man, changed coaches ...there are a lot of reasons why the canes are where they are

If you think it’s solely from the flames trade then I may have to rethink your hockey IQ 😉 lol

Colorado could give up the 4th overall and Jost + + for Malkin?
- Pacificgem

Imagine if they sign Duchene and then draft his linemate with Ottawa’s pick lol

Imagine if they sign Duchene and then draft his linemate with Ottawa’s pick lol
- Redmile247

- boonerbuck

Who’s #36?

I wonder how many Hughes will have next year?
- VANTEL

In the playoffs? I’ll wager less than five. I’d say 5 less

I wonder how many Hughes will have next year?
- VANTEL

I don’t think he’ll be far behind except for the physical side.

Who’s #36?
- 1970vintage

I was wondering the same.

I wonder how many Hughes will have next year?
- VANTEL

Let’s speculate that the team makes a run at a few of the names being thrown around. Watching these playoffs do you think our players with the addition of Malkin and Subban could physically compete in the Western Conference?

It’s a honest question to see what people think. Not an endorsement of Malkin and/or Subban, insert any name you want.

I wonder how many Hughes will have next year?
- VANTEL

Still find it so weird that you like Quinn but aren’t high on Jack

Let’s speculate that the team makes a run at a few of the names being thrown around. Watching these playoffs do you think our players with the addition of Malkin and Subban could physically compete in the Western Conference?

It’s a honest question to see what people think. Not an endorsement of Malkin and/Subban, insert any name you want.
- Makita

After trading for Malkin and Subban, you won’t have at least one of Horvat, Hughes or Boeser, possibly not even 2 of them.