Definitely being his troll self. Not much of a point difference though.
- Ftown19125

I’m trolling.

Let me give you a dose of reality. The reality is a Laughton, Raffl and Hartman line would currently be our third line. I don’t know how, when and who pushed these players back on the depth chart because when I watched the Flyers this season, players like Justin Bailey, Phil Varone or Corban Knight were on our fourth line...and even if one of these players were scratched, a defenseman took their place because we kept dressing seven. Now is this trolling or fact?

Come over to reality, there is plenty of room. Now that’s trolling.

I’m trolling.

Let me give you a dose of reality. The reality is a Laughton, Raffl and Hartman line would currently be our third line. I don’t know how, when and who pushed these players back on the depth chart because when I watched the Flyers this season, players like Justin Bailey, Phil Varone or Corban Knight were on our fourth line...and even if one of these players were scratched, a defenseman took their place because we kept dressing seven. Now is this trolling or fact?

Come over to reality, there is plenty of room. Now that’s trolling.
- SuperSchennBros

i didn't say you were trolling you bozo. talking about the obvious troll you quoted.

I sure hope Hartman picks up the physicality a bit more.
- youarewrong

He needs to stay up on his skates

I’m trolling.

Let me give you a dose of reality. The reality is a Laughton, Raffl and Hartman line would currently be our third line. I don’t know how, when and who pushed these players back on the depth chart because when I watched the Flyers this season, players like Justin Bailey, Phil Varone or Corban Knight were on our fourth line...and even if one of these players were scratched, a defenseman took their place because we kept dressing seven. Now is this trolling or fact?

Come over to reality, there is plenty of room. Now that’s trolling.
- SuperSchennBros

assuming giroux, couturier, voracek, jvr, patrick, lindblom and tk are all ahead of them. no that would not be our 3rd line.

assuming giroux, couturier, voracek, jvr, patrick, lindblom and tk are all ahead of them. no that would not be our 3rd line.
- Ftown19125

Not to mention if they add a player in FA.

Not to mention if they add a player in FA.
- ClaudeFather

exactly.

If you add a quality center and wing all three (top 9) centers will have good players flanking them.

Here are the 10 forwards we have now. If nothing is subtracted and 2 are added, it’s better paper depth than the start of last season. Imagine just 1 impact forward Acquired in the FA and 1 young skill guy via trade or promoted from within. Depth

Giroux
Couturier
Voracek
JVR
Konecny
Lindblom
Patrick
Laughton
Hartman
Raffl

i didn't say you were trolling you bozo. talking about the obvious troll you quoted.
- Ftown19125

I wasn’t trolling him, moron.

If he was really being sarcastic (which I’m still not convinced he was), the dumbest thing you could do is be sarcastic without making obvious, which that wasn’t an obviously sarcastic post at all!

I wasn’t trolling him, moron.

If he was really being sarcastic (which I’m still not convinced he was), the dumbest thing you could do is be sarcastic without making obvious, which that wasn’t an obviously sarcastic post at all!
- SuperSchennBros

again, i never said you were trolling anyone. i also wasn't talking to you, or about you. the person i was talking to knew exactly what/who i was talking about. you just don't know how to follow a conversation.

I wasn’t trolling him, moron.

If he was really being sarcastic (which I’m still not convinced he was), the dumbest thing you could do is be sarcastic without making obvious, which that wasn’t an obviously sarcastic post at all!
- SuperSchennBros

dude, who crapped in your cornflakes?

assuming giroux, couturier, voracek, jvr, patrick, lindblom and tk are all ahead of them. no that would not be our 3rd line.
- Ftown19125

You know three players play on one line, right? If you aren’t aware, you have some counting to do.

dude, who crapped in your cornflakes?
- ClaudeFather

The dumb guys assuming I was trolling a guy, when I was just speaking honestly. Nothing I said was out of line.

You know three players play on one line, right? If you aren’t aware, you have some counting to do.
- SuperSchennBros

he named 7, add one FA or two, or ,a FA and a top prospect to the third line and what do you get??? 9 players, leaving the trio spoken of as the fourth.

You know three players play on one line, right? If you aren’t aware, you have some counting to do.
- SuperSchennBros

is this dude serious?

again, i never said you were trolling anyone. i also wasn't talking to you, or about you. the person i was talking to knew exactly what/who i was talking about. you just don't know how to follow a conversation.
- Ftown19125

You were two talking about me in response to Claudefather’s original reaction to my original post. What? Are you try to worm your way out now? Like, what is this?

again, i never said you were trolling anyone. i also wasn't talking to you, or about you. the person i was talking to knew exactly what/who i was talking about. you just don't know how to follow a conversation.
- Ftown19125

You were two talking about me in response to Claudefather’s original reaction to my original post. What? Are you try to worm your way out now? Like, what is this?

is this dude serious?
- Ftown19125

Well the fact you can’t count seems to be a very serious issue.

You were two talking about me in response to Claudefather’s original reaction to my original post. What? Are you try to worm your way out now? Like, what is this?
- SuperSchennBros

No need to worm my way out of anything. I was never at any point talking about you. It was about PLind. I just quoted ClaudeFather responding to you, also about PLind. You just couldn't follow along.

Well the fact you can’t count seems to be a serious issue.
- SuperSchennBros

OK, 7 guys above those 3 right? 2 full lines and 1 guy on the 3rd. Explain how Raffl, Laughton and Hartman is the 3rd line.

Are you asking to sign three forwards to create a good second line?
- SuperSchennBros

Im asking to sign two forwards, to create a good-to-great second line.

Not sure where you got three from, but on Chuck Fletcher's list of off season needs, he already mentioned a top line winger, so why not go after two top 6 guys to solidify the top 6 and not have to break the bank on one player. Especially if that top 6 guy is not going to come here (i.e. Panarin, Pavelski, Duchene)

Just goal totals...minimum of 25 and max 40. I don’t have a comparison handy for you...if that total is better than we had from the 4th line this season? ...how does that compare to “solid” 4th lines around the league? Idk
- NC Flyers Fan

That goal total would be very high for a 4th line.

No need to worm my way out of anything. I was never at any point talking about you. It was about PLind. I just quoted ClaudeFather responding to you, also about PLind. You just couldn't follow along.
- Ftown19125

Wow....

Well when you respond to a post that was directed to someone but don’t actually name who you are talking about, nobody is going to be able to follow this, Ftown.

You see what I did there?

OK, 7 guys above those 3 right? 2 full lines and 1 guy on the 3rd. Explain how Raffl, Laughton and Hartman is the 3rd line.
- Ftown19125

not sure if he can, popcorn's in the mic, brb

OK, 7 guys above those 3 right? 2 full lines and 1 guy on the 3rd. Explain how Raffl, Laughton and Hartman is the 3rd line.
- Ftown19125

Wow....

Is one player and two blanks make for a really good third line? These “four line players” you have penciled in are going to come up and fill in that third line.