Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
So what exactly should have Jim paid for him? a 26 sign year old signed long term to a decent cap hit. Not taking a bad contract back with him. Please provide some actual trade vs your own personal arm chairing GMing - manvanfan
I would draw the line at a 1st. If it took a 2nd + 3rd, then sure. If Tampa said no, then I wish them good luck at finding another GM who will play a 1st + 3rd for Miller knowing that Tampa needs to shed cap space. They I wait by the phone for the call back.
That's what teams did to the Leafs and Preds. They knew both GM's had to shed cap space asap and took advantage of it.
|
|
|
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
Whatever helps you sleep at night, Don. - Nucker101
I’ll sleep fine. It’s just a sport. As long as it wasn’t a lottery pick next season I wouldn’t have freaked out. I certainly understand the anger though. Looking forward to having some size next to elias |
|
|
|
I'm oh so happy we weaponized the cap. - golfingsince
I was really hoping for an anti-climatic weekend...one where there were some decent draft choices, and all the complaints were “why didn’t the Canucks do something!”.
Really hard to have confidence in this management team, other than drafting.
|
|
Fidel
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Twitter Joined: 08.11.2006
|
|
|
Next blog will probably be the most difficult to write. Ever!
Dont quit now Carol! |
|
NewYorkNuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: New York, NY Joined: 07.11.2015
|
|
|
I'm oh so happy we weaponized the cap. - golfingsince
You have to be careful when you weaponize it to turn the safety on or you'll end up shooting yourself in the foot |
|
storm88
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Surrey, BC Joined: 09.29.2011
|
|
|
So what exactly should have Jim paid for him? a 26 sign year old signed long term to a decent cap hit. Not taking a bad contract back with him. Please provide some actual trade vs your own personal arm chairing GMing - manvanfan
5.25 Million 4 years left, for a guy with 13 goals (75 games) on a high offensive team.
Career high is 53 pts. Basically a 40+ pt player for a 1st and 3rd. Ridiculous.
|
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
I’ll sleep fine. It’s just a sport. As long as it wasn’t a lottery pick next season I wouldn’t have freaked out. I certainly understand the anger though. Looking forward to having some size next to elias - CanuckDon
Fair enough. |
|
|
|
Don't trade 1sts. At very least, for a Dman. Not another mid 6.
Inexcusable.
Reeks of a lame duck GM trying to save his job.
- storm88
Being 12 points out of a playoff spot and being SUB .500 is wayyyy too much of a deficit to be trading 1sts
|
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
5.25 Million 4 years left, for a guy with 13 goals (75 games) on a high offensive team.
Career high is 53 pts. Basically a 40+ pt player for a 1st and 3rd. Ridiculous. - storm88
He's probably more of a 50 point player when he gets consistent top 6 + PP time with a decent C to play with.
I like Miller.
The one thing easier to swallow here is that he's actually a good offensive player unlike Sutter/Gudbranson. The cost is high, but at least the player should provide an actual boost to the team offensively. |
|
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Joined: 09.24.2014
|
|
|
Being 12 points out of a playoff spot and being SUB .500 is wayyyy too much of a deficit to be trading 1sts - classic321
we have the best pro scouts in the league |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
Hey Marwood, how you like the trade? |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
RD's take on the Miller deal
"Jimbo at his best" |
|
storm88
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Surrey, BC Joined: 09.29.2011
|
|
|
He's probably more of a 50 point player when he gets consistent top 6 + PP time with a decent C to play with. - Nucker101
Do u move 1sts for probably's?
1sts from teams like ours?
I know you agree, but had to say it. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
5.25 Million 4 years left, for a guy with 13 goals (75 games) on a high offensive team.
Career high is 53 pts. Basically a 40+ pt player for a 1st and 3rd. Ridiculous. - storm88
If you go back through and look at the highest scoring players in drafts. You will probably find that 40+ player is generally 15-20 highest scoring players in drafts.
JT Miller is 13th in his draft in scoring. If you move from 20th spot to 15th in draft it would probably cost you a 3rd round pick. |
|
|
|
we have the best pro scouts in the league - Codes1087
Got enough damn centers |
|
|
|
Hey Marwood, how you like the trade? - VanHockeyGuy
We talked he won't be leaving the woodpile today. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Do u move 1sts for probably's?
1sts from teams like ours?
I know you agree, but had to say it. - storm88
1st round picks are biggest probably's than guys who are 40 plus point players. Unless you are getting a top 10 draft pick |
|
|
|
He's probably more of a 50 point player when he gets consistent top 6 + PP time with a decent C to play with.
I like Miller.
The one thing easier to swallow here is that he's actually a good offensive player unlike Sutter/Gudbranson. The cost is high, but at least the player should provide an actual boost to the team offensively. - Nucker101
13 goals |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
If you go back through and look at the highest scoring players in drafts. You will probably find that 40+ player is generally 15-20 highest scoring players in drafts. - manvanfan
it's apples to oranges when you evaluate player for picks trades using this logic.
The benefit of drafting/developing your own similar player is the cheap production you get before they get paid fair value on their 2nd or 3rd contracts. Plus you get more years of their prime. So even if both players turn out relatively equal, you benefit much more from the draft pick turning out than you do from trading for a player. |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
He's probably more of a 50 point player when he gets consistent top 6 + PP time with a decent C to play with.
I like Miller.
The one thing easier to swallow here is that he's actually a good offensive player unlike Sutter/Gudbranson. The cost is high, but at least the player should provide an actual boost to the team offensively. - Nucker101
Yes he's a good player but man we are not in a position to trade 1st round picks. |
|
|
|
1st round picks are biggest probably's than guys who are 40 plus point players. Unless you are getting a top 10 draft pick - manvanfan
I feel like he was trying to hard to to make a draft day splash and got trigger happy. |
|
|
|
Yes he's a good player but man we are not in a position to trade 1st round picks. - golfingsince
THis. Not for a 3rd liner. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
13 goals - thundachunk
He's usually good for 20+, he spent some time in the doghouse in Tampa, didn't get his usual ice time. Not a ringing endorsement, I know, but that's why Tampa was so dominant during the regular season. They had a player of Miller's caliber in their doghouse while Canuck fans were trying to get excited about Leivo/Pearson as potential 2nd line help for Horvat. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
THis. Not for a 3rd liner. - thundachunk
2nd liner |
|