Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Mike Augello: Leafs follow familiar formula for 2019 Draft picks
Author Message
BKups
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto
Joined: 01.26.2012

Jun 24 @ 2:06 PM ET
If you're Dubas you think the team has a shot at the conference finals - or further - that's 28-31

You can't get the shot without freeing up cap space to sign everyone we know needs signing + find a top 4 D

Maybe there was a better deal out there but honestly, this is a top 5 NHL team guys stop crying over late first round picks.

- Mr_Smokey


The price was definitely steep, I think Dubas was worried about 4m offer sheets to Kap and Johnsson, he needed to move Marleau's 6m and he did but it definitely wasn't the most creative way as we have seen in the past with dead-cap weight. Good news is there isn't a massive difference between late first and seconds. Would have been nice to package Marleau up with a sweetener (1st) if need be and a prospect/player to have gotten a Dman back from Carolina
Aaron_85
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 04.22.2014

Jun 24 @ 2:08 PM ET
was it kypreos who reported the marleau, brogram and a 5th to arizona for a 4th trade?

dubas really should have done that trade vs. the carolina one tbh imho

- Tumbleweed


Did he also report if Marleau would waive his NMC for this deal?

I'm fine either way on the two deals. Borgman is already better than a bunch of first round picks. How do we know the first rounder isn't Tyler Biggs 2.0?
The Law
Toronto Maple Leafs
Joined: 01.29.2008

Jun 24 @ 2:09 PM ET
was it kypreos who reported the marleau, brogram and a 5th to arizona for a 4th trade?

dubas really should have done that trade vs. the carolina one tbh imho

- Tumbleweed


Atta boy ...!
MaximusAurelius
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: #FireDubas
Joined: 04.23.2012

Jun 24 @ 2:09 PM ET
I love the "get creative" part with no solutions offered up.

Retire? Can't because 35+ contract
Trade him to any team with space? Can't since NMC
Retain salary in deal? Can't, player has NMC + need the full cap space

It all really boiled down to Dubas had to pay a hefty price to move this along.

Only way to save it was to convince Benning that Marleau was better than Miller.

- Aaron_85


Wedgie provided the perfect solution - mutual agreement to terminate the contract.

In addition - might want to go back to last year's playoffs - quite a few people were saying how good Marleau was playing (one of the best on the team).
He had a mediocre season - not as if he cannot play ok next season.
Somehow however, Nylander with the pathetic season is 'bound to be better next season for sure, worth every penny of his 6.9mln caphit'.
Atomic Wedgie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: The centre of the hockey universe
Joined: 07.31.2006

Jun 24 @ 2:09 PM ET
If you're Dubas you think the team has a shot at the conference finals - or further - that's 28-31

You can't get the shot without freeing up cap space to sign everyone we know needs signing + find a top 4 D

Maybe there was a better deal out there but honestly, this is a top 5 NHL team guys stop crying over late first round picks.

- Mr_Smokey

I can't possibly imagine there was.

He's barely a 3rd liner on a bad team.

The Leafs didn't have the option of waiting until July 2nd to trade him.

So you had to find a team that was a) willing to spend the money to buy him out; and b) willing to pay the cap hit over the next two years.

That's a really weird combo - a team willing to pay cash, but who also are cheap so they still have cap room.

Gotta give Dubas some credit here: he made the best of a horrible situation.
BKups
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto
Joined: 01.26.2012

Jun 24 @ 2:10 PM ET
C'mon man. The Leafs HAD to move him. If they had him on the roster they'd have to had moved multiple young talented forwards. There was no option.

And to trade him ...it HAD to be to a team willing to buy him out. The buy out window ends June 30th.

So we should assume that Dubas canvassed the whole league and there were probably only 2 or 3 teams with the ability to buy him out and eat the 6.25 in cap space.

And we should assume that he took the best deal possible.

It sucks that it cost a first to get rid of a guy's contract ...but, lesson learned is don't (frank) around with those 35+ contracts. I like Lou but that one's on Lou.

- The Law


Yeah that's fair, I think the fans just want to see those cupboards continually stocked, Sandin looks to be a great pick last year. Here is to hoping the 2nd and 3rd rounders they went with can be NHL players someday
Atomic Wedgie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: The centre of the hockey universe
Joined: 07.31.2006

Jun 24 @ 2:11 PM ET
Wedgie provided the perfect solution - mutual agreement to terminate the contract.

In addition - might want to go back to last year's playoffs - quite a few people were saying how good Marleau was playing (one of the best on the team).
He had a mediocre season - not as if he cannot play ok next season.
Somehow however, Nylander with the pathetic season is 'bound to be better next season for sure, worth every penny of his 6.9mln caphit'.

- MaximusAurelius

I provided the perfect theoretical solution - I may very well have been talking out of my arse.

I have no idea if the league would have allowed it.
BKups
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto
Joined: 01.26.2012

Jun 24 @ 2:11 PM ET
Did he also report if Marleau would waive his NMC for this deal?

I'm fine either way on the two deals. Borgman is already better than a bunch of first round picks. How do we know the first rounder isn't Tyler Biggs 2.0?

- Aaron_85


Dubas and Burke seem very different at the draft table. I mean Dubas uses two phones at a time...
Symba007
Montreal Canadiens
Location: No, ON
Joined: 02.26.2007

Jun 24 @ 2:12 PM ET
I have been talking out of my arse.
- Atomic Wedgie

and I thought you had bad breath all that time
Aaron_85
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 04.22.2014

Jun 24 @ 2:13 PM ET
Wedgie provided the perfect solution - mutual agreement to terminate the contract.

In addition - might want to go back to last year's playoffs - quite a few people were saying how good Marleau was playing (one of the best on the team).
He had a mediocre season - not as if he cannot play ok next season.
Somehow however, Nylander with the pathetic season is 'bound to be better next season for sure, worth every penny of his 6.9mln caphit'.

- MaximusAurelius


As Wedgie said he isn't sure if it's a viable strategy. Also, that doesn't guarantee Marleau would want to be terminated knowing he is giving up 6 million bucks in salary.
Aaron_85
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 04.22.2014

Jun 24 @ 2:13 PM ET
Dubas and Burke seem very different at the draft table. I mean Dubas uses two phones at a time...
- BKups


I have to respect Dubas seemingly doing some work all throughout draft weekend.
Atomic Wedgie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: The centre of the hockey universe
Joined: 07.31.2006

Jun 24 @ 2:14 PM ET
As Wedgie said he isn't sure if it's a viable strategy. Also, that doesn't guarantee Marleau would want to be terminated knowing he is giving up 6 million bucks in salary.
- Aaron_85

From Marleau's perspective, what actually happened is much better than what I was proposing.

Dude gets 2/3 of his salary and becomes a UFA.

It really couldn't have worked out better...for Marleau.
The Law
Toronto Maple Leafs
Joined: 01.29.2008

Jun 24 @ 2:14 PM ET
Wedgie provided the perfect solution - mutual agreement to terminate the contract.

In addition - might want to go back to last year's playoffs - quite a few people were saying how good Marleau was playing (one of the best on the team).
He had a mediocre season - not as if he cannot play ok next season.
Somehow however, Nylander with the pathetic season is 'bound to be better next season for sure, worth every penny of his 6.9mln caphit'.

- MaximusAurelius


word was that he couldn't play in nhl if the 'mutual ag't' was taken.

also, you think Marleau and Leafs wouldn't have gone that route if it was available?

RickJames77
Boston Bruins
Location: We’re Too Old, Boston
Joined: 04.03.2013

Jun 24 @ 2:14 PM ET
I provided the perfect theoretical solution - I may very well have been talking out of my arse.

I have no idea if the league would have allowed it.

- Atomic Wedgie

You talked out of your ass with such conviction, though, that I went ahead and got you a bigger tooth brush.
MaximusAurelius
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: #FireDubas
Joined: 04.23.2012

Jun 24 @ 2:15 PM ET
I provided the perfect theoretical solution - I may very well have been talking out of my arse.

I have no idea if the league would have allowed it.

- Atomic Wedgie


To my understanding - Marleau would have needed to agree to give up the remaining money on his contract.
post 1st of July signing bonus that was a few million USD?
I guess he still needs the money (I think he has four kids, so yeah )
in fact, Marleau and Canes could still agree on a mutual agreement instead of the buyout - Marleau could be interested in that when it seems a trade to SJ (or Ana/Ari/Vegas?) cannot be made.. so mutual agreement and then 850k contract with bonus for 1y - so he can get his 75+ games in..?
Atomic Wedgie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: The centre of the hockey universe
Joined: 07.31.2006

Jun 24 @ 2:15 PM ET
word was that he couldn't play in nhl if the 'mutual ag't' was taken.

also, you think Marleau and Leafs wouldn't have gone that route if it was available?

- The Law

Maybe they didn't think of it, because Wedgie is much more geniuser than Dubas.
Atomic Wedgie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: The centre of the hockey universe
Joined: 07.31.2006

Jun 24 @ 2:16 PM ET
word was that he couldn't play in nhl if the 'mutual ag't' was taken.

also, you think Marleau and Leafs wouldn't have gone that route if it was available?

- The Law

Was anyone other than me actually floating this idea?
BKups
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto
Joined: 01.26.2012

Jun 24 @ 2:16 PM ET
As Wedgie said he isn't sure if it's a viable strategy. Also, that doesn't guarantee Marleau would want to be terminated knowing he is giving up 6 million bucks in salary.
- Aaron_85


I thought his contract was front loaded, so in his final year it was only like 800k payout or something along those lines... could be totally wrong though.

Anyway all in all, Leafs get the 6m cap space they desperately needed and we have to assume Dubas took the best possible deal available before July 1st. Pretty incredible Lou was able to sign Rielly and Kadri on those sweet deals but then overdoes the UFA deals in Marleau and Z
The Law
Toronto Maple Leafs
Joined: 01.29.2008

Jun 24 @ 2:16 PM ET
I provided the perfect theoretical solution - I may very well have been talking out of my arse.

I have no idea if the league would have allowed it.

- Atomic Wedgie


It's was wonderful ..in theory.

The fact that it didn't happen ...informs us that it COULDN'T happen.

Anybody saying otherwise is just trying to create a Dubas sucks narrative.
JohnFergusonJr
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: I'd be happy with Che Guevara; hero of the Cuban revolution. - Canada Cup aka AOCC
Joined: 01.14.2011

Jun 24 @ 2:17 PM ET
I provided the perfect theoretical solution - I may very well have been talking out of my arse.

I have no idea if the league would have allowed it.

- Atomic Wedgie


Isn't it possible to terminate a contract for participating in activities outside of hockey that could result in an injury?

This is an extreme example but the LA Kings terminated Richards contract for having a bunch of drugs at the border.

What if they found something that Marleau wouldn't be allowed to do (like skydiving or example), have him go skydiving on July 2nd and then terminate his contract.

BKups
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto
Joined: 01.26.2012

Jun 24 @ 2:17 PM ET
I have to respect Dubas seemingly doing some work all throughout draft weekend.
- Aaron_85


Burke just wanders around with his tie around his neck
MaximusAurelius
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: #FireDubas
Joined: 04.23.2012

Jun 24 @ 2:18 PM ET
It's was wonderful ..in theory.

The fact that it didn't happen ...informs us that it COULDN'T happen.

Anybody saying otherwise is just trying to create a Dubas sucks narrative.

- The Law


in my opinion Dubas needed the capspace pre 1st of July, and mutual termination only interesting to Marleau post 1st of July..
BKups
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto
Joined: 01.26.2012

Jun 24 @ 2:18 PM ET
word was that he couldn't play in nhl if the 'mutual ag't' was taken.

also, you think Marleau and Leafs wouldn't have gone that route if it was available?

- The Law


So similar to Buffalo situation last season, except that player won't be back in the NHL. Gotcha
The Law
Toronto Maple Leafs
Joined: 01.29.2008

Jun 24 @ 2:19 PM ET
Was anyone other than me actually floating this idea?
- Atomic Wedgie


I heard that you stole the idea from ol' Bloatsie ...
Aaron_85
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 04.22.2014

Jun 24 @ 2:19 PM ET
I thought his contract was front loaded, so in his final year it was only like 800k payout or something along those lines... could be totally wrong though.

Anyway all in all, Leafs get the 6m cap space they desperately needed and we have to assume Dubas took the best possible deal available before July 1st. Pretty incredible Lou was able to sign Rielly and Kadri on those sweet deals but then overdoes the UFA deals in Marleau and Z

- BKups


His cap hit is like a million+ and his signing bonuses are each like 3 million. So he still makes like 6 million aslong as he's not bought out july 1.

As we already agree on. Dubas did the best job possible with what he had. Inherited a situation and did what he could.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38  Next