How is it not debatable?
Alexander Kerfoot was one of the best defensive forwards in the NHL last season and put up a bonus 40 ish points. That's an impact equal to a first line scorer. Many people, myself included, thought he should have won the Selke.
Agree or don't, at the very least it's debatable.
You thought he should have won the Selke?! Like... if they gave a Selke to a member of each team or something?? Because I know you're not inferring that he was the best 2 way forward in the entire NHL. I know you're not not. Because saying something like that would be straight up retarded. You're not retarded, are you, James?
Sidenote: "Impact player" at least in my books is someone who (for a forward) pops in north of 65 points, and plays in all situations. Kerfoot is not that player. At all.