gcomella34
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: Endicott, NY Joined: 03.03.2015
|
|
|
Ryan Fitzpatrick is 8000 yards away from being in the top 25 all time in yards.
Let that sink in for a minute. - dadeadhead
If that included the yards that DB's got off of his interceptions he'd be leading the NFL. |
|
TheSabresTaco
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: For me. jack Eichel is bobby ryan….that's it. - Octavarium, NY Joined: 05.05.2011
|
|
|
jdfitz77
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: buffalo, NY Joined: 05.21.2007
|
|
|
He'd be hard capped at 20% of the ceiling; if McDavid was a $12.5M player 2 years ago, Gretzky is worth more than twice that. And since you can't pay a player that much under the CBA, he'd be hard capped. - Wetbandit1
So just over 16mil if he signed this year then
Imagine if there was no Cap right now,
how much Gretzky would make???
Didn’t Bobby Holik make like 20mil a year from the Rangers at 1 point?
Or am i thinking of Jagr? |
|
Wetbandit1
Vegas Golden Knights |
|
|
Location: Hail Satan Joined: 10.07.2010
|
|
|
I don’t think it is significantly different
If Tampa has everyone signed except Point,
with 4.0mil of Cap Space left
Putting Callahan on LTIR would allow them to use whatever portion of his Cap hit they want/need to get Point signed
So they could sign him to a 9.8mil per deal & still be Cap compliant
That’s really not any different than if they traded Callahan & didn’t take back Condon
Either way...
that 5.8mil is available for them to use
Making it more complicated than that is what’s unnecessary imo - jdfitz77
No, that's not how it works. If they had $4M in space, and then put Callahan on LTIR they'd have $1.8M over the ceiling to play with. You only get relief of the amount over the cap. |
|
Wetbandit1
Vegas Golden Knights |
|
|
Location: Hail Satan Joined: 10.07.2010
|
|
|
Like I said, though, if Gretzky plays today (assuming in his prime), the CBA isn't structured the way it is. The Union has a lot more leverage. - buffalofan19
Would they though? I don't know. Why would they?
This is not sarcasm, I really don't see a reason why they'd have that much more leverage. |
|
dadeadhead
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: I don't want to say Greztky was a dude when I was watching. Mentalorgasm5 , NY Joined: 07.16.2006
|
|
|
No, that's not how it works. If they had $4M in space, and then put Callahan on LTIR they'd have $1.8M over the ceiling to play with. You only get relief of the amount over the cap. - Wetbandit1
Ding ding |
|
jdfitz77
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: buffalo, NY Joined: 05.21.2007
|
|
|
No, it doesn't. Callahan's hit counts no matter if he's on LTIR or not. They save like $4.5M. Callahan at $5.8M and Condon's buried hit at $1.3M. - Wetbandit1
That’s not totally correct
If they kept Callahan & put him on LTIR,
they’d be able to use all of that 5.8mil to get Point signed
Now that they traded Cally,
they obviously still got his 5.8 to work with
BUT
u gotta subtract the 1.3mil from taking back Condon
So it gives them 5.8mil more room for “overage” in the summer
But 1.3mil LESS to work with once the season starts |
|
Wetbandit1
Vegas Golden Knights |
|
|
Location: Hail Satan Joined: 10.07.2010
|
|
|
If that included the yards that DB's got off of his interceptions he'd be leading the NFL. - gcomella34
Favre would be #1 then. |
|
|
|
Ryan Fitzpatrick is 8000 yards away from being in the top 25 all time in yards.
Let that sink in for a minute. - dadeadhead
i never would have guessed that.. wow |
|
dadeadhead
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: I don't want to say Greztky was a dude when I was watching. Mentalorgasm5 , NY Joined: 07.16.2006
|
|
|
i never would have guessed that.. wow - SabresFaninIndiana
Yep |
|
Wetbandit1
Vegas Golden Knights |
|
|
Location: Hail Satan Joined: 10.07.2010
|
|
|
That’s not totally correct
If they kept Callahan & put him on LTIR,
they’d be able to use all of that 5.8mil to get Point signed
Now that they traded Cally,
they obviously still got his 5.8 to work with
BUT
u gotta subtract the 1.3mil from taking back Condon
So it gives them 5.8mil more room for “overage” in the summer
But 1.3mil LESS to work with once the season starts - jdfitz77
When a player is placed on LTIR, their cap hit remains on the teams cap payroll and it continues to count as it always did. It also does not provide the club with additional cap-space savings that can be banked for future use while the team operates above the salary cap. Instead, LTIR provides relief if the club's averaged club salary, or payroll, begins to exceed the upper limit.
Edit: If Tampa was exactly at the ceiling, then it would work as you say, getting full relief. |
|
Powerslave
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: Arriving Somewhere But Not Here Joined: 02.10.2011
|
|
|
If that included the yards that DB's got off of his interceptions he'd be leading the NFL. - gcomella34
😂 |
|
jdfitz77
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: buffalo, NY Joined: 05.21.2007
|
|
|
No, that's not how it works. If they had $4M in space, and then put Callahan on LTIR they'd have $1.8M over the ceiling to play with. You only get relief of the amount over the cap. - Wetbandit1
Huh??
That doesn’t make sense
Let me put it another way
Let’s say they signed Point & that put them right at 81.5mil
Could they then put Callahan on LTIR & sign say Gardiner for 5.8mil per? |
|
IonSabres
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: I said that months ago, keep up!, FL Joined: 03.10.2013
|
|
|
Well, well, well, well, well..... Well, well..
https://twitter.com/chris.../1156279632217464832?s=19
I'd like to protest the Johnson pick, and I'd like to protest Cole Caufields position in the lineup - TheSabresTaco
I like the fact that their #1 and 2 Dmen are Sabres |
|
jdfitz77
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: buffalo, NY Joined: 05.21.2007
|
|
|
When a player is placed on LTIR, their cap hit remains on the teams cap payroll and it continues to count as it always did. It also does not provide the club with additional cap-space savings that can be banked for future use while the team operates above the salary cap. Instead, LTIR provides relief if the club's averaged club salary, or payroll, begins to exceed the upper limit.
Edit: If Tampa was exactly at the ceiling, then it would work as you say, getting full relief. - Wetbandit1
So then they did essentially have the option to go a full 5.8mil over the Cap...
Correct? |
|
Wetbandit1
Vegas Golden Knights |
|
|
Location: Hail Satan Joined: 10.07.2010
|
|
|
Huh??
That doesn’t make sense
Let me put it another way
Let’s say they signed Point & that put them right at 81.5mil
Could they then put Callahan on LTIR & sign say Gardiner for 5.8mil per? - jdfitz77
Yes. You have to subtract your current cap space before you apply relief. |
|
dadeadhead
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: I don't want to say Greztky was a dude when I was watching. Mentalorgasm5 , NY Joined: 07.16.2006
|
|
|
Huh??
That doesn’t make sense
Let me put it another way
Let’s say they signed Point & that put them right at 81.5mil
Could they then put Callahan on LTIR & sign say Gardiner for 5.8mil per? - jdfitz77
As of right now they have 11.1 in space plus the 10% you can go over in the offseason. |
|
jdfitz77
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: buffalo, NY Joined: 05.21.2007
|
|
|
Yes. You have to subtract your current cap space before you apply relief. - Wetbandit1
So they could figure in that 5.8mil when signing Point
But now then can only figure in 4.5mil bc they took back Condon |
|
buffalofan19
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: Wonderful things can happen when you sow seeds of distrust in a garden full of (bum)holes Joined: 07.01.2007
|
|
|
When a player is placed on LTIR, their cap hit remains on the teams cap payroll and it continues to count as it always did. It also does not provide the club with additional cap-space savings that can be banked for future use while the team operates above the salary cap. Instead, LTIR provides relief if the club's averaged club salary, or payroll, begins to exceed the upper limit.
Edit: If Tampa was exactly at the ceiling, then it would work as you say, getting full relief. - Wetbandit1
Even then, LTIR doesn't kick in until closer to the season starts. He would count against their 10% during the offseason (without relief), which Tampa is trying to avoid. It's a timing difference for sure. |
|
IonSabres
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: I said that months ago, keep up!, FL Joined: 03.10.2013
|
|
|
Huh??
That doesn’t make sense
Let me put it another way
Let’s say they signed Point & that put them right at 81.5mil
Could they then put Callahan on LTIR & sign say Gardiner for 5.8mil per? - jdfitz77
They would get relief on the amount they are over the 81.5, up to Callahan's 5.8 salary
If they signed Gardiner to $4m, then they only get credit for the 4.
If they signed Gardiner for 6.2 they would have to move somebody, then LTIR Cally and get credit for the overage amount only (capped again at Callys 5.8) |
|
buffalofan19
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: Wonderful things can happen when you sow seeds of distrust in a garden full of (bum)holes Joined: 07.01.2007
|
|
|
So they could figure in that 5.8mil when signing Point
But now then can only figure in 4.5mil bc they took back Condon - jdfitz77
The cap is about $83 million, which means you can be at $91.3 million in salary until September ($83 x 110%). Callahan's $5.8 goes against that figure, because the LTIR figure/relief/whatever-you-want-to-call-it does not kick in until the beginning of the season.
By unloading Callahan, they have more room to work with before they get to that $91.3, which is their target (supposedly), for now. |
|
IonSabres
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: I said that months ago, keep up!, FL Joined: 03.10.2013
|
|
|
So then they did essentially have the option to go a full 5.8mil over the Cap...
Correct? - jdfitz77
Yes. |
|
IonSabres
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: I said that months ago, keep up!, FL Joined: 03.10.2013
|
|
|
The cap is about $83 million, which means you can be at $91.3 million in salary until September ($83 x 110%). Callahan's $5.8 goes against that figure, because the LTIR figure/relief/whatever-you-want-to-call-it does not kick in until the beginning of the season.
By unloading Callahan, they have more room to work with before they get to that $91.3, which is their target (supposedly), for now. - buffalofan19
No, not 83..it is in fact 81.5 |
|
|
|
Yes. - IonSabres
and then someone gets hurt....
|
|
buffalofan19
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: Wonderful things can happen when you sow seeds of distrust in a garden full of (bum)holes Joined: 07.01.2007
|
|
|
No, not 83..it is in fact 81.5 - IonSabres
So the target is about $89.7 (rounded). |
|