VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
You mean there are alts?! - WhiteLie
I think Marwood is NuckUp |
|
WhiteLie
Referee |
|
|
Location: When youre 7 pages behind Dont bother catching up, you will never get that time back - Codes1087 Joined: 07.26.2010
|
|
|
I expect that Petey's shooting % will drop year over year, but my expectation is that he'll still get more assists and more shots (maybe 25 goals?) Both should be products of better line mates (Boeser full health, Miller and/or Ferland), a more balanced offence across at least the first two lines causing more spreading of coverage, and a more effective power play with the addition of Hughes & Myers.
As Carol blogged, what was obvious in the sophomore season stats for recent Calder winners was that, on average, they didn't produce at the same rates as in their rookie seasons Hoping that Petey bucks that trend! - SlightlyOffside
I think he bucks the trend, largely because I think he's too smart to not. I think with the addition of a Ferland/Miller, you've got guys who can dig out the puck from down low and find him for the shot or a high/low play. There are also more weapons to defend on the powerplay, which should give him a little more room to operate |
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
I think Marwood is NuckUp - VanHockeyGuy
Probably ....explains a lot |
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
I think he bucks the trend, largely because I think he's too smart to not. I think with the addition of a Ferland/Miller, you've got guys who can dig out the puck from down low and find him for the shot or a high/low play. There are also more weapons to defend on the powerplay, which should give him a little more room to operate - WhiteLie
Then there's also Hughes insane passing skills |
|
WhiteLie
Referee |
|
|
Location: When youre 7 pages behind Dont bother catching up, you will never get that time back - Codes1087 Joined: 07.26.2010
|
|
|
I think Marwood is NuckUp - VanHockeyGuy
Agreed, he needed to keep his reputation as a hater so he created NuckUp to gush over Benning |
|
RealityChecker
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: I stay away from the completely crazy rumours on the internet.I will occasionally debunk them-Eklund Joined: 04.18.2010
|
|
|
That's good, no one likes him anyways.
I'll PM you a short list of other 'posters' you should keep an eye on. - Marwood
...actually, it would be better to just start a thread. |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
Agreed, he needed to keep his reputation as a hater so he created NuckUp to gush over Benning - WhiteLie
It's a vicious circle which clearly is the result of Schizophrenia. Indica can only help so much. |
|
WhiteLie
Referee |
|
|
Location: When youre 7 pages behind Dont bother catching up, you will never get that time back - Codes1087 Joined: 07.26.2010
|
|
|
Then there's also Hughes insane passing skills - SMBDragon
I really like Hughes, and think he'll be exciting to watch, but I am tempering expectations on his offensive impact this year largely because a combination of:
1) The powerplay has been typically very stagnant, which won't utilize his strengths as a roving defenseman
2) His shot does not seem overly dangerous to me. Without the threat of a shot I think penalty killers will hone in on his passing options, neutralizing him a bit
If the coaches let him loose a bit or if his shot improves this summer, things could obviously change |
|
chompsey
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Cody Hodgson can walk on water Joined: 10.04.2005
|
|
|
I really like Hughes, and think he'll be exciting to watch, but I am tempering expectations on his offensive impact this year largely because a combination of:
-The powerplay has been typically very stagnant, which won't utilize his strengths as a roving defenseman
-His shot does not seem overly dangerous to me. Without the threat of a shot I think penalty killers will hone in on his passing options, neutralizing him a bit
If the coaches let him loose a bit or if his shot improves this summer, things could obviously change - WhiteLie
Perhaps thats where you see Edler playing his offside and Hughes feeding him up high or Pettersson down low with Boeser lurking on the other circle and Miller in the bumper position.....I think the addition of Miller and Hughes is going to markedly improve the PP just by hockey IQ alone..... |
|
|
|
Perhaps thats where you see Edler playing his offside and Hughes feeding him up high or Pettersson down low with Boeser lurking on the other circle and Miller in the bumper position.....I think the addition of Miller and Hughes is going to markedly improve the PP just by hockey IQ alone..... - chompsey
I’d take Myers over Edler for PP shooting, but otherwise agree!
|
|
|
|
Agreed, he needed to keep his reputation as a hater so he created NuckUp to gush over Benning - WhiteLie
So.....he’s a closet Benning Lover? |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
So.....he’s a closet Benning Lover? - Shuswap Wap
Serious Man Crush. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Perhaps thats where you see Edler playing his offside and Hughes feeding him up high or Pettersson down low with Boeser lurking on the other circle and Miller in the bumper position.....I think the addition of Miller and Hughes is going to markedly improve the PP just by hockey IQ alone..... - chompsey
Edler should be stuck on PP2, the guy just doesn’t have the creativity to be on a good first unit |
|
chompsey
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Cody Hodgson can walk on water Joined: 10.04.2005
|
|
|
So.....he’s a closet Benning Lover? - Shuswap Wap
Many topless posters of JB, Chiarelli and Matt Dillon all over his walls.... |
|
chompsey
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Cody Hodgson can walk on water Joined: 10.04.2005
|
|
|
Edler should be stuck on PP2, the guy just doesn’t have the creativity to be on a good first unit - Nucker101
But he'll end up on PP1 regardless..... |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
But he'll end up on PP1 regardless..... - chompsey
Then Brown is a stubborn fool |
|
Retinalz
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 01.31.2015
|
|
|
Then Brown is a stubborn fool - Nucker101
Myers would be better for PP1 than Edler.
Bo-EP-Boeser-Hughes-Myers PP1
Miller-Ferland-Bearschi-JV-Edler PP2 |
|
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Joined: 09.24.2014
|
|
|
Myers would be better for PP1 than Edler.
Bo-EP-Boeser-Hughes-Myers PP1
Miller-Ferland-Bearschi-JV-Edler PP2 - Retinalz
Swap miller and myers and I would be happy with those.
Miller was on the PP with Stamkos, point, kucherov and hedman. He was good with them too |
|
Retinalz
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 01.31.2015
|
|
|
Swap miller and myers and I would be happy with those.
Miller was on the PP with Stamkos, point, kucherov and hedman. He was good with them too - Codes1087
He would also be the Center for PP2, otherwise you need to find room for Sutter |
|
belcherbd
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Nanaimo Joined: 02.16.2007
|
|
|
He would also be the Center for PP2, otherwise you need to find room for Sutter - Retinalz[/quote]
|
|
Retinalz
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 01.31.2015
|
|
|
[quote=Retinalz]He would also be the Center for PP2, otherwise you need to find room for Sutter - belcherbd[/quote]
Exactly, Miller goes PP2 for being a center. |
|
93Nucks
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: BC Joined: 04.04.2018
|
|
|
Myers would be better for PP1 than Edler.
Bo-EP-Boeser-Hughes-Myers PP1
Miller-Ferland-Bearschi-JV-Edler PP2 - Retinalz
It might not be popular but what about:
PP1: Miller-EP-Boeser-Hughes-Myers
PP2: Ferland-Bo-Baertschi-Pearson-Edler
Not sure if I like the 2 defense man as most teams use the 4 forwards. |
|
Retinalz
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 01.31.2015
|
|
|
It might not be popular but what about:
PP1: Miller-EP-Boeser-Hughes-Myers
PP2: Ferland-Bo-Baertschi-Pearson-Edler
Not sure if I like the 2 defense man as most teams use the 4 forwards. - 93Nucks
Bo make such an excellent screen/net front presence. Plus his ability to win faceoffs is best on the team. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
He would also be the Center for PP2, otherwise you need to find room for Sutter - Retinalz
EP, Horvat, Miller and Guadette should all be ahead of Sutter on the "PP C" depth chart so unless all of them are on PP1 and/or injured, Sutter shouldn't sniff PP time. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Bo make such an excellent screen/net front presence. Plus his ability to win faceoffs is best on the team. - Retinalz
Miller is good in front of the net too though, he can play that role on the first unit was well. |
|