Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Carol Schram: A late surge earns the Vancouver Canucks a point against the Avalanche
Author Message
Reubenkincade
Location: BC
Joined: 11.18.2016

Nov 18 @ 5:08 PM ET
Umm, first, if you read my post again you'll see I attempted humour, but failed miserably.

Secondly, are the Habs mining poop?

- bloatedmosquito


I got the humor and I ain't very smart, so what does that tell you about VHG?😁
Pacificgem
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Swedish4Ever, BC
Joined: 07.01.2007

Nov 18 @ 5:08 PM ET
OIL!



Playoff bound??

- LordHumungous

lol
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Nov 18 @ 5:12 PM ET
Shouldn't be hard to narrow down to a likely target. Who plays on the Hab's 3rd line?
- YeOldTimer

bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks
Location: The Clit Whisperer
Joined: 10.22.2011

Nov 18 @ 5:13 PM ET
I got the humor and I ain't very smart, so what does that tell you about VHG?😁
- Reubenkincade


Let's see the response.

I just noticed, are you posting from NY?
Reubenkincade
Location: BC
Joined: 11.18.2016

Nov 18 @ 5:19 PM ET
Let's see the response.

I just noticed, are you posting from NY?

- bloatedmosquito



No. Bit of a joke, that a few might understand, including VHG.😁
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla!
Joined: 08.15.2014

Nov 18 @ 5:23 PM ET
lol
- Pacificgem

lol
NewYorkNuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: New York, NY
Joined: 07.11.2015

Nov 18 @ 5:37 PM ET
As long a splaying 26+ mins a night every game doesn't destroy one of Drai or McDavid, they probably take 1st in the Pacific. Sucks for me cause I have a bet with 2 buddies with Beer on the line.
- Retinalz



Would love to see them both miss like 4 games at the same time. Nothing serious, the flu or whatever. Just to see how terrible they would be without them.
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Nov 18 @ 5:46 PM ET
Would love to see them both miss like 4 games at the same time. Nothing serious, the flu or whatever. Just to see how terrible they would be without them.
- NewYorkNuck

That would be fun.
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Nov 18 @ 6:00 PM ET
That would be fun.
- Marwood

For what reason?
NorthNuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Yellowknife, NWT
Joined: 05.30.2016

Nov 18 @ 6:59 PM ET
Screenshot-20191118-165901-Twitter

Screenshot-20191118-165713-Twitter
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 09.26.2010

Nov 18 @ 7:00 PM ET
Screenshot-20191118-165901-Twitter

Screenshot-20191118-165713-Twitter

- NorthNuck

VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Nov 18 @ 7:06 PM ET
My guess on the Corey Schneider waiving today is because he will be traded to Utica. Benning does not want to lose a goalie on waivers two years in a row. Once CS clears you will see a trade of CS for Loudini and Mikey DiPietro . Schneider will stay with the Comets and Loui will report to NJ.

I think the Habs will look to the Devils and also send Caulfield ( Hughes old line mate) and a second and a fourth for Taylor Hall.

That is my prediction.


Utica play the Devils Wednesday and Domingue already playing with NJD

Trade in the next 48 hours
NorthNuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Yellowknife, NWT
Joined: 05.30.2016

Nov 18 @ 7:06 PM ET

- Nucker101

Whenever I see group photos including management I always look for JB
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Nov 18 @ 7:09 PM ET
Whenever I see group photos including management I always look for JB
- NorthNuck



You are a sick twisted individual.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Nov 18 @ 7:14 PM ET
Beagle ready to play tomorrow . Sutter will be back in a few day. Roussel now full contact probably ready in a week. A player needs to be moved.
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla!
Joined: 08.15.2014

Nov 18 @ 7:30 PM ET
Would love to see them both miss like 4 games at the same time. Nothing serious, the flu or whatever. Just to see how terrible they would be without them.
- NewYorkNuck

They have Kassian.

No biggy.
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla!
Joined: 08.15.2014

Nov 18 @ 7:35 PM ET
My guess on the Corey Schneider waiving today is because he will be traded to Utica. Benning does not want to lose a goalie on waivers two years in a row. Once CS clears you will see a trade of CS for Loudini and Mikey DiPietro . Schneider will stay with the Comets and Loui will report to NJ.

I think the Habs will look to the Devils and also send Caulfield ( Hughes old line mate) and a second and a fourth for Taylor Hall.

That is my prediction.


Utica play the Devils Wednesday and Domingue already playing with NJD

Trade in the next 48 hours

- VANTEL



Bold Moves Cotton!!

SlightlyOffside
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Ajax, ON
Joined: 01.25.2016

Nov 18 @ 7:56 PM ET
My guess on the Corey Schneider waiving today is because he will be traded to Utica. Benning does not want to lose a goalie on waivers two years in a row. Once CS clears you will see a trade of CS for Loudini and Mikey DiPietro . Schneider will stay with the Comets and Loui will report to NJ.

I think the Habs will look to the Devils and also send Caulfield ( Hughes old line mate) and a second and a fourth for Taylor Hall.

That is my prediction.


Utica play the Devils Wednesday and Domingue already playing with NJD

Trade in the next 48 hours

- VANTEL


A trade in the next 48 wouldn't shock me...but this is convoluted and doesn't appear to make much sense to me:

* Corey has a $6M cap hit until the end of the 20-21 season, plus a full NTC
* Corey is paid $18M in real $ ($6M each) for those 3 seasons, while LE is only paid an additional $5M (since the signing bonuses are paid)
* LE may play in the NHL again (somewhere), while CS appears to be "done"
* Mikey has upside and may play in the NHL (somewhere, sometime)

Why would the Canucks do this?? Why wouldn't you just take a chance on losing MD / a goalie on waivers, rather than pay an extra $13M for an AHL-level goalie?

Help me understand what you see the motivation to be??
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Nov 18 @ 8:01 PM ET
A trade in the next 48 wouldn't shock me...but this is convoluted and doesn't appear to make much sense to me:

* Corey has a $6M cap hit until the end of the 20-21 season, plus a full NTC
* Corey is paid $18M in real $ ($6M each) for those 3 seasons, while LE is only paid an additional $5M (since the signing bonuses are paid)
* LE may play in the NHL again (somewhere), while CS appears to be "done"
* Mikey has upside and may play in the NHL (somewhere, sometime)

Why would the Canucks do this?? Why wouldn't you just take a chance on losing MD / a goalie on waivers, rather than pay an extra $13M for an AHL-level goalie?

Help me understand what you see the motivation to be??

- SlightlyOffside


Loui Eriksson has 9 mil owing after this year. Canucks will buy out Schneider paying him 8 mil total instead of 9 mil and also gain 4 mil in cap space for next year and the following year. The actual money spent from next year and on they save 1 mil. The only money they lose is this year .

Edit. Just checked no savings . Loui is owed 8 mil after next year . Buying out CS is 8 mil also. So they ony get the 4 mil cap space for 2 years.
SlightlyOffside
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Ajax, ON
Joined: 01.25.2016

Nov 18 @ 8:13 PM ET
Loui Eriksson has 9 mil owing after this year. Canucks will buy out Schneider paying him 8 mil total instead of 9 mil and also gain 4 mil in cap space for next year and the following year. The actual money spent from next year and on they save 1 mil. The only money they lose is this year .
- VANTEL



you're right on LE and $ owing...I missed the salary in the last year of his contract.

Well...OK, let's see. It seems like a lot of wasted money to me, but clearing out LE's cap hit will require taking back something comparably ugly.
SlightlyOffside
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Ajax, ON
Joined: 01.25.2016

Nov 18 @ 8:15 PM ET
you're right on LE and $ owing...I missed the salary in the last year of his contract.

Well...OK, let's see. It seems like a lot of wasted money to me, but clearing out LE's cap hit will require taking back something comparably ugly.

- SlightlyOffside


edit: what was the point of Brackett scouting the games, then? Seems there would have to be a player of interest to the Canucks, and that wouldn't be CS
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Nov 18 @ 8:17 PM ET
you're right on LE and $ owing...I missed the salary in the last year of his contract.

Well...OK, let's see. It seems like a lot of wasted money to me, but clearing out LE's cap hit will require taking back something comparably ugly.

- SlightlyOffside


It is wasted money for sure but ask yourself this , if Canucks could have bought out Eriksson would they have? I think they would have. They want the 4 mil cap space.

They can buy out Schneider and cut their losses.
hillbillydeluxe
Vancouver Canucks
Location: I didn't read it , BC
Joined: 09.21.2013

Nov 18 @ 8:24 PM ET


He was the reason why I was still interested during 3rd periods in games last year when the Canucks were down by 2+ goals, I would just wait for him to stir poop up

- Nucker101




SlightlyOffside
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Ajax, ON
Joined: 01.25.2016

Nov 18 @ 8:24 PM ET
It is wasted money for sure but ask yourself this , if Canucks could have bought out Eriksson would they have? I think they would have. They want the 4 mil cap space.

They can buy out Schneider and cut their losses.

- VANTEL


I agree that if they could buyout LE they would have. They (obviously) want more value for the actual $ spend + $6M cap hit than they are currently getting.

This is a more complicated scenario than I would have expected from the Canucks, but I can see your logic...the actual $ over the next 2.5 seasons are a wash, plus they get the cap release on a buyout. Costs Mike D to get the $4M in cap relief

This seems to be predicated on CS waiving his NTC...not sure what the deal is there.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Nov 18 @ 8:28 PM ET
I agree that if they could buyout LE they would have. They (obviously) want more value for the actual $ spend + $6M cap hit than they are currently getting.

This is a more complicated scenario than I would have expected from the Canucks, but I can see your logic...the actual $ over the next 2.5 seasons are a wash, plus they get the cap release on a buyout. Costs Mike D to get the $4M in cap relief



This seems to be predicated on CS waiving his NTC...not sure what the deal is there.

- SlightlyOffside


Well he could spend the next two and a half years in Binghamton or get payed 2/3 of his salary for doing nothing and becoming a free agent again.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next