Different? That’s my cue lol

Edler Hughes
OJ Myers
Tryamkin Rafferty
Benn
- Nighthawk

Sorry, is this supposed to be better than what they ran with in ‘19/‘20?

Sorry, is this supposed to be better than what they ran with in ‘19/‘20?
- 1970vintage

The rule is not to question without making a counter-proposal. I've had to talk to you about this before.

The rule is not to question without making a counter-proposal. I've had to talk to you about this before.
- Marwood

Hughes Woo
Joulevi Rafferty
Edler Myers
Benn
Brisebois

Problem solved? 8 capable D, no salary cap issues.

Hughes Woo
Joulevi Rafferty
Edler Myers
Benn
Brisebois

Problem solved? 8 capable D, no salary cap issues.
- 1970vintage

Myers as a bottom pairing d-man is a step in the right direction. Don't forget that you always pick up some one on waivers. Definitely agree that the cap is not an issue.

Hughes Woo
Joulevi Rafferty
Edler Myers
Benn
Brisebois

Problem solved? 8 capable D, no salary cap issues.
- 1970vintage

I was thinking sooner but if the future then

Hughes Woo
OJ Myers
Rathbone Rafferty
Utunen

I was thinking sooner but if the future then

Hughes Woo
OJ Myers
Rathbone Rafferty
Utunen
- Nighthawk

Um, Tryamkin?

Um, Tryamkin?
- Marwood

Sure. More for the present for me to see how he fairs.

Hughes Tryamkin
Edler Myers
OJ Rafferty
Benn

That is letting Tanev go for nothing & gain cap space. Trade Stetcher.

Sure. More for the present for me to see how he fairs.

Hughes Tryamkin
Edler Myers
OJ Rafferty
Benn

That is letting Tanev go for nothing & gain cap space. Trade Stetcher.
- Nighthawk

Do another one!

Sure. More for the present for me to see how he fairs.

Hughes Tryamkin
Edler Myers
OJ Rafferty
Benn

That is letting Tanev go for nothing & gain cap space. Trade Stetcher.
- Nighthawk

That’s definitely a 100+ point team fighting for the division lead right there.

Sure. More for the present for me to see how he fairs.

Hughes Tryamkin
Edler Myers
OJ Rafferty
Benn

That is letting Tanev go for nothing & gain cap space. Trade Stetcher.
- Nighthawk

Jake Tryamkin and Sutter for Ristolainen

Edler Myers
Hughes Risto
Dillon Schenn

Benn

Jake Tryamkin and Sutter for Ristolainen

Edler Myers
Hughes Risto
Dillon Schenn

Benn
- VANTEL

Another 100 + point team.

Another 100 + point team.
- Marwood

We could add your golden boy Tanev and make it a 200 pt team

We could add your golden boy Tanev and make it a 200 pt team
- VANTEL

108 points. Let's try and be realistic.

108 points. Let's try and be realistic.
- Marwood

If you want to pay a shot blocker 6 mil and bring back the same D and watch them get 40-50 shots against them a night then who are we to argue what you want.

If you want to pay a shot blocker 6 mil and bring back the same D and watch them get 40-50 shots against them a night then who are we to argue what you want.
- VANTEL

The funny thing is you called him "my golden boy" and I have never said anything about Tanev one way or the other. I was just rolling with Rosterhawk.

The funny thing is you called him "my golden boy" and I have never said anything about Tanev one way or the other. I was just rolling with Rosterhawk.
- Marwood

I didn't find it that funny.

I offered up a roster that added a 40 point Dman and two bottom pairing Dmen that added a lot more toughness.

I know you have been quite vocal about push back when a player gets hit or blind sided.

I didn't find it that funny.

I offered up a roster that added a 40 point Dman and two bottom pairing Dmen that added a lot more toughness.

I know you have been quite vocal about push back when a player gets hit or blind sided.
- VANTEL

Seriously, then.
I never advocated for keeping Tanev and I don't really care what kind of imaginary, super awesome defense that you dreamed up.

Seriously, then.
I never advocated for keeping Tanev and I don't really care what kind of imaginary, super awesome defense that you dreamed up.
- Marwood

True we know you don't really care for too much . You're more of a complain about everything style of guy.

If you don't care about my super awesome defense I dreamed up how come you are the first and only one to comment on it.

Seriously, then.
I never advocated for keeping Tanev and I don't really care what kind of imaginary, super awesome defense that you dreamed up.
- Marwood

You want him and you know it

Hughes Woo
Joulevi Rafferty
Edler Myers
Benn
Brisebois

Problem solved? 8 capable D, no salary cap issues.
- 1970vintage

Jake Tryamkin and Sutter for Ristolainen

Edler Myers
Hughes Risto
Dillon Schenn

Benn
- VANTEL

Risto hughes -43 each

You don't score 40 pts every year playing in your own end.

Soon as Buffalo got some scoring his plus / minus came way down. Amazing
- VANTEL

It’s interesting you say that cause he’s a negative in both point shares and possession despite producing well. Good in the 4 spot, but Myers is already there. I like risto, but the guy has proven he’s below average against good competition.

WOW! Czech nudists being forced to wear face masks, how ugly do you have to be to draw attention away from your nudity?

It’s interesting you say that cause he’s a negative in both point shares and possession despite producing well. Good in the 4 spot, but Myers is already there. I like risto, but the guy has proven he’s below average against good competition.
- neem55

I disagree with his own zone coverage but I am not going to get in pages of discussion.

Risto is a 40 point guy, he is brought in for his scoring. A counter argument would be expecting Tanev to put up 40 pts.

Edler is a shut down guy How many shut down guys do you want . I want another Dman that plays in the other teams zone.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOLGfvs6lLY