Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Michael Ghofrani: Should The Buffalo Sabres Replace Their Goaltending Tandem?
Author Message
jcragcrumple
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Reluctant bridge jumper; 6th round OHL draft pick, YT
Joined: 04.04.2016

Apr 29 @ 9:06 PM ET
Reinhart is a better player than Bennett. Nobody is disputing that, not that I am aware of at least. However, all else being equal, if they drafted Bennett over Reinhart, the Sabres are still in the same place: one of the worst teams of this decade. Neither make enough of an impact on the win column.
- buffalofan19


That's not even remotely true. Without Reinhart, our best natural RW is Okposo and we have no forward trade chips.

Bennett and Girgensons are duking it out for a 4th line LW spot.

Again, totally disingenuous. The problem isn't sam Reinhart, the problem is that nothing has been done to address the problem that has existed since the summer of '18
navinrjohnson
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We are finally good, NY
Joined: 12.08.2009

Apr 29 @ 9:06 PM ET
Bennett is a tougher Girgensons. Trying to put him in the same boat as Reinhart is disingenuous
- jcragcrumple

if you played reinhart between skinner and olofsson he would be a decent second line center IMO


much better then playing him between griffith and pouliot
buffalofan19
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Wonderful things can happen when you sow seeds of distrust in a garden full of (bum)holes
Joined: 07.01.2007

Apr 29 @ 9:06 PM ET
I will absolutely admit a large part of my hesitation to sign Reinhart long term comes from Skinner. I was all for it. I was wrong. The problem was putting a premium on wingers. By signing Reinhart even to market value, you're doing the same thing.
kingcong39
Buffalo Sabres
Location: albany, NY
Joined: 02.21.2007

Apr 29 @ 9:06 PM ET
Reinhart is a better player than Bennett. Nobody is disputing that, not that I am aware of at least. However, all else being equal, if they drafted Bennett over Reinhart, the Sabres are still in the same place: one of the worst teams of this decade. Neither make enough of an impact on the win column.
- buffalofan19


You're leaving one major aspect out, conveniently, and that's not having a quality trade chip that they do in Reinhart compared to Bennett, who would bring back much less in a trade.
kingcong39
Buffalo Sabres
Location: albany, NY
Joined: 02.21.2007

Apr 29 @ 9:07 PM ET
reinhart is a better chip to have in your pocket today though then bennett
- navinrjohnson


Way better. Bingo.
buffalofan19
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Wonderful things can happen when you sow seeds of distrust in a garden full of (bum)holes
Joined: 07.01.2007

Apr 29 @ 9:07 PM ET
That's not even remotely true. Without Reinhart, our best natural RW is Okposo and we have no forward trade chips.

Bennett and Girgensons are duking it out for a 4th line LW spot.

Again, totally disingenuous. The problem isn't sam Reinhart, the problem is that nothing has been done to address the problem that has existed since the summer of '18

- jcragcrumple



The Sabres already can't get much worse.
jdfitz77
Buffalo Sabres
Location: buffalo, NY
Joined: 05.21.2007

Apr 29 @ 9:09 PM ET
you skipped over the mcnabb part
- Michael Pachla


No, i didn’t
Soon as LA gave him a chance he’s been playing well ever since

GMTM has some weird bias against him bc he was a Darcy pick & not one of his guys
Michael Pachla
Buffalo Sabres
Location: solid!!!
Joined: 09.05.2007

Apr 29 @ 9:09 PM ET
I think after this year they have enough young fire power.

Now is the time to make the “ROR” trade.

- Pegullaville


point taken...however, those top-six centers are extremely hard to come by and usually cost a lot
kingcong39
Buffalo Sabres
Location: albany, NY
Joined: 02.21.2007

Apr 29 @ 9:09 PM ET
He became a RW because he isn't capable of playing center at this level. He had two tries at it. I will grant you that the first was during his 9 game tryout, but the second one was just as awful. I said it earlier this afternoon. It's not blaming Reinhart. He is who he is. He's earned the salary he's going to get. The problem is that if the Sabres are the team to give it to him, they are going to stay stuck in the place they are at now, nowhere near a championship.
- buffalofan19


Another generalization that isn't true. They can't make other moves, like trading 2 of Ristolainen, Montour, and Miller, along with other trade pieces, to improve the team while keeping Reinhart? There are many ways to improve the team.
navinrjohnson
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We are finally good, NY
Joined: 12.08.2009

Apr 29 @ 9:10 PM ET
point taken...however, those top-six centers are extremely hard to come by and usually cost a lot
- Michael Pachla

Vladimir Sobotka
Patrik Berglund
Tage Thompson
1st round pick
2nd round pick
navinrjohnson
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We are finally good, NY
Joined: 12.08.2009

Apr 29 @ 9:11 PM ET
There are many ways to improve the team.
- kingcong39

a new coach, gm and president is a good place to start
jcragcrumple
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Reluctant bridge jumper; 6th round OHL draft pick, YT
Joined: 04.04.2016

Apr 29 @ 9:11 PM ET
The Sabres already can't get much worse.
- buffalofan19


They would absolutely be worse with Bennett than Reinhart, and their current predicament has less to do with Sam Reinhart and more to do with the complete failure to recognize and address deficiencies that were apparent 20 months ago
Hatboro_Swords
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Next year is gonna be 05/06 all over again, PA
Joined: 07.30.2010

Apr 29 @ 9:11 PM ET
And weren’t ppl saying that their line was doing well analytically anyways?

Tough to blame Sam for not turning those scrubs into legit players
Griffith went back to being a career AHLet
And i don’t think Pouliot has played hockey anywhere since last i checked
Weren’t there even ppl here that wanted to re-sign him??? Wtf?

- jdfitz77

Considering they haven’t played games since 9:02 PM, I’d say that is a safe assumption.
jdfitz77
Buffalo Sabres
Location: buffalo, NY
Joined: 05.21.2007

Apr 29 @ 9:13 PM ET
if you played reinhart between skinner and olofsson he would be a decent second line center IMO


much better then playing him between griffith and pouliot

- navinrjohnson


It’s ridiculous he wasn’t tried back at Center with all the issues we’ve had the last 2 seasons
Buff36
Buffalo Sabres
Joined: 10.13.2019

Apr 29 @ 9:13 PM ET
Vladimir Sobotka
Patrik Berglund
Tage Thompson
1st round pick
2nd round pick

- navinrjohnson

And we were such a good team with that Center.
navinrjohnson
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We are finally good, NY
Joined: 12.08.2009

Apr 29 @ 9:13 PM ET
when gerbe gets bashed I pile on

when he deserves credit, I give it to him

"Favre said he has talked with Rodgers since the Packers traded up four spots to pick Love at No. 26 on Thursday.

"I'm not going to talk about all that we talked about, but he was ... let's just say surprised that they went in that direction," Favre said."

https://www.espn.com/nfl/...ers-finish-career-packers
navinrjohnson
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We are finally good, NY
Joined: 12.08.2009

Apr 29 @ 9:14 PM ET
It’s ridiculous he wasn’t tried back at Center with all the issues we’ve had the last 2 seasons
- jdfitz77

agreed

once ror got traded, he should have received a good luck with 2 of our better wingers
Pegullaville
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Toronto
Joined: 03.16.2011

Apr 29 @ 9:14 PM ET
who's are their rw's?
- Michael Pachla


Look at the amount of wingers that could have been had the last few years via UFA or trades.

They are a lot more attainable then good Center man.
navinrjohnson
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We are finally good, NY
Joined: 12.08.2009

Apr 29 @ 9:14 PM ET
And we were such a good team with that Center.
- Buff36

we had griffith and pouliot as our 3rd line wingers
Buff36
Buffalo Sabres
Joined: 10.13.2019

Apr 29 @ 9:15 PM ET
It’s ridiculous he wasn’t tried back at Center with all the issues we’ve had the last 2 seasons
- jdfitz77

It was, said it a lot, but 2 coaches thought differently.
buffalofan19
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Wonderful things can happen when you sow seeds of distrust in a garden full of (bum)holes
Joined: 07.01.2007

Apr 29 @ 9:15 PM ET
Another generalization that isn't true. They can't make other moves, like trading 2 of Ristolainen, Montour, and Miller, along with other trade pieces, to improve the team while keeping Reinhart? There are many ways to improve the team.
- kingcong39



None of those players have the trade value Reinhart does, not even close. His perceived (key word being perceived) value is much higher. The biggest need for this team, we all agree, is a legitimate 2nd line center. Other than Eichel and Dahlin, no team gives the Sabres one unless Reinhart is involved. You can't say the same for anyone else on this roster.
jcragcrumple
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Reluctant bridge jumper; 6th round OHL draft pick, YT
Joined: 04.04.2016

Apr 29 @ 9:15 PM ET
point taken...however, those top-six centers are extremely hard to come by and usually cost a lot
- Michael Pachla


They should have paid the cost of Mittelstadt to acquire Trochek

Instead we're going to be stuck with some bargain-bin 30-something that Botterill can get for a 3rd and Laaksonen because his ego wont let him admit he whiffed on Mittelstadt
navinrjohnson
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We are finally good, NY
Joined: 12.08.2009

Apr 29 @ 9:15 PM ET
Yikes sounds like A Rod is done with the Packers if he goes to the Pat's I'm done
- gerbe75pts

"For salary-cap purposes, he's virtually untradable until after the 2021 season."
Pegullaville
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Toronto
Joined: 03.16.2011

Apr 29 @ 9:15 PM ET
I will absolutely admit a large part of my hesitation to sign Reinhart long term comes from Skinner. I was all for it. I was wrong. The problem was putting a premium on wingers. By signing Reinhart even to market value, you're doing the same thing.
- buffalofan19


You complete me.
navinrjohnson
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We are finally good, NY
Joined: 12.08.2009

Apr 29 @ 9:16 PM ET
It was, said it a lot, but 2 coaches thought differently.
- Buff36

consider the coaches
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59  Next