coudon tabarnak, are you following at all?!?
we're talking who to keep to center the 3rd line!!
- fidopro

Funny you ask that question with such sarcasm, tabarnak!

I said pay him as a top 6 C, not play him there... maybe you should try and keep up...

centers, I'm talking centers
but if you want to compare Danault with Point and Stone, I'm sure his agent would hire you on the spot
- fidopro

Point is a C


Tabarnak

Funny you ask that question with such sarcasm, tabarnak!

I said pay him as a top 6 C, not play him there... maybe you should try and keep up...
- obie

you said trade him and keep Domi. wtf!

you said trade him and keep Domi. wtf!

- fidopro

Yea, that's what I want them to do, what's your point?

I swear you we're dropped on your god damn head one too many times...

centers, I'm talking centers
but if you want to compare Danault with Point and Stone, I'm sure his agent would hire you on the spot
- fidopro

A) you said all of them, didn't specify C's
B) Point is a C

Point is a C


Tabarnak
- obie

yes he is.
is Stone a center too?

Yea, that's what I want them to do, what's your point?

I swear you we're dropped on your god damn head one too many times...
- obie

yet you're the one who wants to keep Domi over Danault. eh ben

A) you said all of them, didn't specify C's
B) Point is a C
- Takemedrunkimhome

poop, you got me.
trade Danault right (frank)in now!!

yet you're the one who wants to keep Domi over Danault. eh ben
- fidopro

Yea what a shame, I want guys that can score more than a dozen goals a year for 6 million on my team!

poop, you got me.
trade Danault right (frank)in now!!
- fidopro

It was your argument. Not my fault it's full of obvious holes. I'm on the keep Danault side. I also like facts and trying to have a rational discussion based on them but in fairness it's my fault for coming to the internet for that

Yea what a shame, I want guys that can score more than a dozen goals a year for 6 million on my team!
- obie

because everyone knows the #1 priority for a 3rd line center is to score goals.
what was I thinking.
lets' put both of them on the market, and see what the return is for each.

Normal? He tried to dictate his use in a contract year through the media...


People are going on about Domi not wanting to play the wing, he never said it publicly himself but everyone sh!ts on him because someone said that he might of said he prefers C
- obie

Danault is always team-first on the ice, but has once said to the media that he's not interested in a 3rd line C role.

Domi never said anything in the media about his usage, but has been playing selfishly many, many times in his 2 seasons with the club, even costing a few games.

We'll keep Danault and trade Domi+ for scoring help and you will like it.

Danault is always team-first on the ice, but has once said to the media that he's not interested in a 3rd line C role.

Domi never said anything in the media about his usage, but has been playing selfishly many, many times in his 2 seasons with the club, even costing games a few times.

Danault wins, end of debate.
- Not_Yan

but he only scored 13 goals!!!

Louis de Mercier m'a bloqué sur twitter
- stinger67

Danault is always team-first on the ice, but has once said to the media that he's not interested in a 3rd line C role.

Domi never said anything in the media about his usage, but has been playing selfishly many, many times in his 2 seasons with the club, even costing a few games.

Danault wins, end of debate.
- Not_Yan

NO


YOU WIN


Start of debate

because everyone knows the #1 priority for a 3rd line center is to score goals.
what was I thinking.
lets' put both of them on the market, and see what the return is for each.
- fidopro

Take the Habs out of this and let me know your opinion on this:

How does a team trading for Danault view him? Are they bringing in a top 6 C or a 3rd line C?

How does a team trading for Domi view him? Top 6 C or 3rd line C?

Take the Habs out of this and let me know your opinion on this:

How does a team trading for Danault view him? Are they bringing in a top 6 C or a 3rd line C?

How does a team trading for Domi view him? Top 6 C or 3rd line C?
- Takemedrunkimhome

depends on the team. PIT would see him as a #3C. WPG would see him as a #2C.
as for Domi, no team can see him as a #3C imo. so it's either #2C or LW.

- WaterBoy

Je me souviens pas d'avoir été méchant avec...

la dernière affaire que je lui ai répondu:

Ceux qui s'en prennent constamment à Lehkonen ne connaissent rien au hockey. C'est un travailleur acharné, le gars est excellent en défensive et en échec avant. Il annule beaucoup de jeux adverses en zone neutre....et il a 3 points, dont un but gagnant en 5 matchs jusqu'ici.

depends on the team. PIT would see him as a #3C. WPG would see him as a #2C.
as for Domi, no team can see him as a #3C imo. so it's either #2C or LW.
- fidopro

Pittsburgh would play him on the wing

depends on the team. PIT would see him as a #3C. WPG would see him as a #2C.
as for Domi, no team can see him as a #3C imo. so it's either #2C or LW.
- fidopro

Ok, so based on that, would you agree that the intended role a player is expected to play will impact the amount a team is willing to give up in a trade? If you agree, would that not, in theory, make the younger top 6 guy in Domi more valuable in terms of trade value than the older middle 6 guy in Danault?

Danault is always team-first on the ice, but has once said to the media that he's not interested in a 3rd line C role.

Domi never said anything in the media about his usage, but has been playing selfishly many, many times in his 2 seasons with the club, even costing a few games.

We'll keep Danault and trade Domi+ for scoring help and you will like it.
- Not_Yan

I like it

Ok, so based on that, would you agree that the intended role a player is expected to play will impact the amount a team is willing to give up in a trade? If you agree, would that not, in theory, make the younger top 6 guy in Domi more valuable in terms of trade value than the older middle 6 guy in Danault?
- Takemedrunkimhome

of course, we could expect a much better return from WPG than from PIT.

and no. imo Danault has more value than Domi. period. even if he is older.
Danault is one of the best defensive center in the league, and can produce his fair share of points.
Domi, we never know what we're gonna get. if he was as consistent as Danault, that would be another debate. but he is not.
until he is, it's not even close.

Je me souviens pas d'avoir été méchant avec...

la dernière affaire que je lui ai répondu:

Ceux qui s'en prennent constamment à Lehkonen ne connaissent rien au hockey. C'est un travailleur acharné, le gars est excellent en défensive et en échec avant. Il annule beaucoup de jeux adverses en zone neutre....et il a 3 points, dont un but gagnant en 5 matchs jusqu'ici.


- stinger67

*Bans Piqueur.

of course, we could expect a much better return from WPG than from PIT.

and no. imo Danault has more value than Domi. period. even if he is older.
Danault is one of the best defensive center in the league, and can produce his fair share of points.
Domi, we never know what we're gonna get. if he was as consistent as Danault, that would be another debate. but he is not.
until he is, it's not even close.
- fidopro

As I said yesterday beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I'd imagine for some GMs Danault holds the greater value. I'd also imagine for others it's Domi. It's a more nuanced issue rather than clear black and white in my eyes

the important thing is that we're all great friends on the internet