if he's dumb enough to give a 5th and 3M+ to Edmonston, he's certainly dumb enough to let Petry walk
- fidopro

Lol big Bergevin fan then

Lol big Bergevin fan then
- Karine Hains

Best thing is to wait and see, alot of ppl were not a big fan of Chiarot when he signed neither but I think he silenced quite a few critics after

Lol big Bergevin fan then
- Karine Hains

a bit tired of patching holes with rejects from other teams, 4th liners and grade B plugs. when you need a brand new car you don't buy a used skateboard.

Best thing is to wait and see, alot of ppl were not a big fan of Chiarot when he signed neither but I think he silenced quite a few critics after
- habs88888

absolutely, but how many Chiarot do we need?!?
that defensive 15-20 pt dman on the top4 Karine was talking about, that's Chiarot! don't need another one.

This is what I'd like to see

Chiarot-Weber
Romanov-Petry
Edmonson-Juulsen/Fleury

absolutely, but how many Chiarot do we need?!?
that defensive 15-20 pt dman on the top4 Karine was talking about, that's Chiarot! don't need another one.
- fidopro

well technically Weber and Petry would be the point-producing dmen, and Chiarot and Edmonson their respective stay-at-home Ds. I remember when Petry got here it was far from being a consensus, and he did have his struggles but today barely anyone complains about him, so I'll wait before judging where Edmunson fits in there. and he hasn't signed yet anyways, so...

This is what I'd like to see

Chiarot-Weber
Romanov-Petry
Edmonson-Juulsen/Fleury
- braidan

Romanov on the 2nd pairing from the get-go?

This is what I'd like to see

Chiarot-Weber
Romanov-Petry
Edmonson-Juulsen/Fleury
And mr.peanut become a ref
- braidan

Thanks bud

well technically Weber and Petry would be the point-producing dmen, and Chiarot and Edmonson their respective stay-at-home Ds. I remember when Petry got here it was far from being a consensus, and he did have his struggles but today barely anyone complains about him, so I'll wait before judging where Edmunson fits in there. and he hasn't signed yet anyways, so...
- Pat1993

to me Weber is a stay at home dman. he doesn't carry the puck like Petry does. yes he gets points but many on the PP. they need a puck moving dman on the left side to play with him imo. and play Chiarot where he should be playing which is on the 2nd pairing.

Thanks bud
- mr.peanut

peanut the despot, with all that power, I wonder where this would go...

to me Weber is a stay at home dman. he doesn't carry the puck like Petry does. yes he gets points but many on the PP.
- fidopro

yeah I get what you're saying. we'll see what MB's next moves will be, he still has money and picks at his disposal, he might not be done on the backend yet

And ggggggrrrr i just lost the signal on my tv, i can’t see any sport now umph
- Karine Hains

crackedstreams.com

Romanov on the 2nd pairing from the get-go?
- Pat1993

In a perfect world Romanov and one of Juulsen/Fleury would fit in, but probably not.
It's what I'd like to see

to me Weber is a stay at home dman. he doesn't carry the puck like Petry does. yes he gets points but many on the PP. they need a puck moving dman on the left side to play with him imo. and play Chiarot where he should be playing which is on the 2nd pairing.
- fidopro

can't disagree with that, as much as the Weber/Chiarot pairing has done a decent job, a puck-carrying dman on the 1st pair can come in handy, especially if they want to generate more offense

can't disagree with that, as much as the Weber/Chiarot pairing has done a decent job, a puck-carrying dman on the 1st pair can come in handy, especially if they want to generate more offense
- Pat1993

voilà
watch him sign Krug and carry 10 dmen for next season

crack.com
- KINGKENZO

to me Weber is a stay at home dman. he doesn't carry the puck like Petry does. yes he gets points but many on the PP. they need a puck moving dman on the left side to play with him imo. and play Chiarot where he should be playing which is on the 2nd pairing.
- fidopro

I’m sure you hated the Chiarot trade when it happened too?? I was one of the only ones that told you guys he’d be a great addition as I watched a ton of Jets games being in NW Ontario. There’s no pleasing you.

peanut the despot, with all that power, I wonder where this would go...
- Pat1993

Only one way to find out

voilà
watch him sign Krug and carry 10 dmen for next season
- fidopro

Find a new team please

I’m sure you hated the Chiarot trade when it happened too?? I was one of the only ones that told you guys he’d be a great addition as I watched a ton of Jets games being in NW Ontario. There’s no pleasing you.
- Snots33_77

no, because we needed a guy like him.
but we don't need another one!!

In a perfect world Romanov and one of Juulsen/Fleury would fit in, but probably not.
It's what I'd like to see
- braidan

yeah there are still many question marks, but at least you get the sense they're heading in the right direction defensively, as they'll have more interesting options than last year

no, because we needed a guy like him.
but we don't need another one!!
- fidopro

We need size and a shot from the point and someone that will stand up for our goalies when the get run. We have a team full of pussies.

well that pretty much settles it for this series

voilà
watch him sign Krug and carry 10 dmen for next season
- fidopro

you really have faith

well that pretty much settles it for this series
- Pat1993

(frank) Tampon Bay