Pronman’s thoughts: Schneider was the last of the consensus top-four defenders in this draft available. I like him a lot and see a lot of things that will translate to the NHL. He’s a big right-shot defender who is mobile, kills rushes and can move the puck. I think he can become a quality top-four defenseman and adds to a rich pipeline in New York. Given the Rangers’ depth on the right side, they can afford to take their time with him and Nils Lundkvist.
Location: I would rather see a dudes hairy balls than his hairy feet-Jimbro Joined: 12.13.2013
Oct 6 @ 9:41 PM ET
Those areas of need can still be addressed. And they’re areas of need for right now. No matter who they took at 19oa, they’re not going to help us next year.
I like the pick. Keeps him away from NJ, adds character, size, speed, strength and grit to an otherwise skillful/finesse right side (other than Trouba).
Miller/Schneider is a BIG pairing (have said that about Miller/Trouba, too) - Bean_Dip
Still don't care for the pick. Really think they should have went forward, especially center. And I honestly don't give a (frank) who NJ was going to pick.
I just think it wasn't the smartest pick based on the teams needs. And yeah, last time I heard big physical defenseman not overly offensive, didn't work out so well.
I need to see what RD thinks - mdw7413
Where is Tom at, he lives for draft day and hating every pick we did
Still don't care for the pick. Really think they should have went forward, especially center. And I honestly don't give a (frank) who NJ was going to pick. - mdw7413
Obviously really glad you didn't get him.
Although according to TPC this pick is going to bite us in the ass in a few years, so get your gloat ready. - Fenrir
Whatever Schneider winds up, it won't be worse than taking the 58th ranked prospect right behind him. The Devils didn't have a plan if Schneider wasn't there at 20? They just decided to throw a dart at a dartboard that said "defensemen"?