NorthNuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Yellowknife, NWT Joined: 05.30.2016
|
|
|
Do you regret saying the same thing about the Lou Eriksson contract as well? - manvanfan
How are Holtby and Eriksson in any way comparable?? |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
sorry but don't know what happened everything froze and then see multiple hits on same post. Wasn't intentional. Must be a glitch in the system. - NuckUp
Typical on draft/ufa/TDL days when the traffic overloads the server.
|
|
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla! Joined: 08.15.2014
|
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Never happen at that #. - VanHockeyGuy
He commented willing for a 1yr show me deal. He will be cheap wherever he goes I won’t be surprised if something close. |
|
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Joined: 09.24.2014
|
|
|
4 years, 25 million for matt Murray. WTF Ottawa LOL |
|
|
|
4 years, 25 million for matt Murray. WTF Ottawa LOL - Codes1087
what a garbage deal. murray is poop |
|
NorthNuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Yellowknife, NWT Joined: 05.30.2016
|
|
|
4 years, 25 million for matt Murray. WTF Ottawa LOL - Codes1087
Trying to hit the cap floor |
|
dbot
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down Joined: 10.22.2008
|
|
|
4 years, 25 million for matt Murray. WTF Ottawa LOL - Codes1087
Yikes.
Murray is laughing.
He had Ott mgmt over a barrel.
|
|
|
|
I just got in from walking the dog and missed all the action, Jesus, this is a good deal by Jim Benning, I like the fact that he is seemingly becoming a better GM and having a better long-term thought process. Good on him for not blowing his load this year.
I never wanted them to sign Markstrom to a long-term deal because of his age and because he’s only been a really good goaltender the past couple years, again, good restraint and deal by Jim Benning. - Pacificgem
Wait until he signs Barrie at 6X6 |
|
anavar
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Joined: 02.29.2008
|
|
|
Wait until he signs Barrie at 6X6 - A_SteamingLombardi
Promise that’s not happening |
|
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
dbot
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down Joined: 10.22.2008
|
|
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
He commented willing for a 1yr show me deal. He will be cheap wherever he goes I won’t be surprised if something close. - Nighthawk
Happy to be wrong.
|
|
anavar
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Joined: 02.29.2008
|
|
|
TSN reporting 5m/5 years.
either way...
- dbot
Holtby looking better and better 😂 |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
How are Holtby and Eriksson in any way comparable?? - NorthNuck
You said that to look at his career numbers. Figured you had said the same thing when they signed LE then
Holtby hasn't been as good since winning a cup and Barry Trotz left who does a remarkable job of getting his teams to play solid defence.
I don't think TG and Baumy are the greatest at getting the team to play team defence without just all huddling in front of the net.
Clearly just not finding the silver lining in the signing. I don't have a problem with Holtby or even the term but it feels like 800K too much to which that 800K could possibly be needed to sign someone more important than a back up goalie. |
|
Pres.cup
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Making the most of the worst situation... Canuck fan 4life , BC Joined: 12.23.2014
|
|
|
He is done. Slow as (frank) - CanuckDon
Cheaper and faster then Beagle.... should have offered him 3mx4 and a ntc |
|
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Joined: 09.24.2014
|
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Fidel
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Twitter Joined: 08.11.2006
|
|
|
I’d prefer a small shave but it’s a good deal for only 2yrs. MDP will be ready then. - Nighthawk
Bingo |
|
anavar
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Joined: 02.29.2008
|
|
|
I’d prefer a small shave but it’s a good deal for only 2yrs. MDP will be ready then. - Nighthawk
It is better than talbot at 3 for 11. The two year deal is great. Always prefer cheaper but it works. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
UFA’s must be nervous with cap space drying up. Sens & Wings are salivating. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
If 800k per year for 2 years is the fee for a cup winning, former vezina winner goalie who doesn't need protection, I pay that without even hesitating. - Codes1087
Anton 3x3.5 to stay in Dal |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
It is better than talbot at 3 for 11. The two year deal is great. Always prefer cheaper but it works. - anavar
👍 |
|
NorthNuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Yellowknife, NWT Joined: 05.30.2016
|
|
|
You said that to look at his career numbers. Figured you had said the same thing when they signed LE then
Holtby hasn't been as good since winning a cup and Barry Trotz left who does a remarkable job of getting his teams to play solid defence.
I don't think TG and Baumy are the greatest at getting the team to play team defence without just all huddling in front of the net.
Clearly just not finding the silver lining in the signing. I don't have a problem with Holtby or even the term but it feels like 800K too much to which that 800K could possibly be needed to sign someone more important than a back up goalie. - manvanfan
Holtby was the only goalie in that tier who was willing to sign for short term without protection from expansion.
Totally different scenario from Eriksson, who was expected to be a 1st line forward and produce a ton of offense when he signed.
Holtby was signed to play 30-40 games and mentor Demko as he goes through growing pains as a starter. There wasn't a better candidate for that role on the market, and this signing is low-risk. |
|