Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Longshot but that would be amazing. - VanHockeyGuy
👍 |
|
dbot
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down Joined: 10.22.2008
|
|
|
Longshot but that would be amazing. - VanHockeyGuy
What's it like posting speculative fantasy trades/signings without getting insulted and labelled ?
asking for a friend.
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
What's it like posting speculative fantasy trades/signings without getting insulted and labelled ?
asking for a friend. - dbot
Post before high school is out lol |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
What's it like posting speculative fantasy trades/signings without getting insulted and labelled ?
asking for a friend. - dbot
|
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
What's it like posting speculative fantasy trades/signings without getting insulted and labelled ?
asking for a friend. - dbot
What's it like being a dip sh1t?
|
|
dbot
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down Joined: 10.22.2008
|
|
|
What's it like being a dip sh1t? - VanHockeyGuy
Meta! |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
- boonerbuck
Makes sense. Flames makes about as much sense as the Utah Jazz lol |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Yeah, it's too early right now. I don't like the idea of throwing the D kids to the wolves. I'd rather they made a good deal in lieu of signing a Hamonic for example. - VanHockeyGuy
I don't really know what you mean by throwing the kids to the wolves? Like what do they need to do before they can be tested at the next level? Same as last year where they wait until someone gets injured? That didn't happen.
No one is asking these kids to play 22 minutes a night vs other teams top 2 lines.
Just asking for the simple progression in development plan, which is NHL game action. |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
Makes sense. Flames makes about as much sense as the Utah Jazz lol - Nighthawk
St Louis Rams...
|
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
St Louis Rams...
- boonerbuck
Them too lol
Arizona Cardinals |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
I don't really know what you mean by throwing the kids to the wolves? Like what do they need to do before they can be tested at the next level? Same as last year where they wait until someone gets injured? That didn't happen.
No one is asking these kids to play 22 minutes a night vs other teams top 2 lines.
Just asking for the simple progression in development plan, which is NHL game action. - manvanfan
Yup
Only on D will be a more difficult adjustment. Run 8 D & platoon so they learn easier. |
|
Pres.cup
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Making the most of the worst situation... Canuck fan 4life , BC Joined: 12.23.2014
|
|
|
"Their whole top 2 lines were dependent on Toffoli taking up that spot on the 1st line"?
He played 10 games. Not all 10 had him on that top line.
No wonder there's no author credited and the source is a nameless scout. Who would put their name beside that poop?
- boonerbuck
Yup.... as if losing a player who played 14 games total makes Bo's line any different... Boeser was out, Toffoli came in, no difference really. |
|
NuckUp
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Cap Busters Joined: 07.01.2019
|
|
|
I don't really know what you mean by throwing the kids to the wolves? Like what do they need to do before they can be tested at the next level? Same as last year where they wait until someone gets injured? That didn't happen.
No one is asking these kids to play 22 minutes a night vs other teams top 2 lines.
Just asking for the simple progression in development plan, which is NHL game action. - manvanfan
Yup and only looks like 2 prospects could have shot to slot in to start out of camp. One middle 6F (Hogs) and one 3rd pairing D like OJ. Even if Chatfield/Rafferty make waives doubt Green will want 2 rookie D start. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Has the Zac Mac on Bo's line gone dead from his 15 game stint middle of last year? |
|
NuckUp
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Cap Busters Joined: 07.01.2019
|
|
|
Has the Zac Mac on Bo's line gone dead from his 15 game stint middle of last year? - manvanfan
All possible but you'd think Green would go with JV then Motte before Zacmac. |
|
Pres.cup
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Making the most of the worst situation... Canuck fan 4life , BC Joined: 12.23.2014
|
|
|
Has the Zac Mac on Bo's line gone dead from his 15 game stint middle of last year? - manvanfan
The season is going to be canceled... no point talking about a success story when we can fantasize about a 5 foot 8 player playing on our top line! |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
All possible but you'd think Green would go with JV then Motte before Zacmac. - NuckUp
I see LE in again before Motte. TG likes his D if nothing else. Motte better suited bottom 6 but you never know. One more reason why Hoglander will get a chance. |
|
Pres.cup
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Making the most of the worst situation... Canuck fan 4life , BC Joined: 12.23.2014
|
|
|
All possible but you'd think Green would go with JV then Motte before Zacmac. - NuckUp
Motte is bottom 6, JV, LE then Zach Mack, then Roussel, Podz, Hodz etc.... Motte isn't suited top 6. Imo |
|
Makita
Referee Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: #theonlyrealfan, BC Joined: 02.16.2007
|
|
|
I see LE in again before Motte. TG likes his D if nothing else. Motte better suited bottom 6 but you never know. One more reason why Hoglander will get a chance. - Nighthawk
Geez I hope not with Eriksson, I am hopeful the guy has better options than putting Eriksson in the top 6.
|
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
The season is going to be canceled... no point talking about a success story when we can fantasize about a 5 foot 8 player playing on our top line! - Pres.cup
Who? |
|
Makita
Referee Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: #theonlyrealfan, BC Joined: 02.16.2007
|
|
|
Motte is bottom 6, JV, LE then Zach Mack, then Roussel, Podz, Hodz etc.... Motte isn't suited top 6. Imo - Pres.cup
Yes Motte is bottom 6, the most useful energetic player on the bottom 6. There may be times when his speed and energy may be needed on Horvat's line, but overall not likely very often. |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
JD Burke is a complete idiot.
Not sure how the top 6 has taken a step back, they had Toffoli for all of 14 games. - Reubenkincade
Is the top six better, worse or the same at the start of the coming season than it was at the end of the previous season? Given that there are no more significant changes to come prior to the start of the season, which could obviously change. |
|
Pres.cup
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Making the most of the worst situation... Canuck fan 4life , BC Joined: 12.23.2014
|
|
|
Who? - manvanfan
Hodz, 5 for 8 and a quarter... |
|