|
|
To replace the one they lost. - VanHockeyGuy
Lost or didn't want ?
Tanev and Toffoli 8.75 mil
Schmidt and Virtanen 8.5 mil.
I think if Canucks really wanted Toffoli and Tanev they could have scraped together another quarter mil. |
|
|
|
Calgary
Toronto
Edmonton
Montreal
Winnipeg
Vancouver
Ottawa
Canucks win a lottery position and pick one of the studs on defense, like Owen Power or Brandt Clarke |
|
Pres.cup
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Making the most of the worst situation... Canuck fan 4life , BC Joined: 12.23.2014
|
|
|
Pres.cup
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Making the most of the worst situation... Canuck fan 4life , BC Joined: 12.23.2014
|
|
|
I didn't think you were bald. - A_SteamingLombardi
As an egg |
|
Pacificgem
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Swedish4Ever, BC Joined: 07.01.2007
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe he’s our Kailer Yamamoto? - Pacificgem
Oh great another super soft forward. |
|
Pacificgem
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Swedish4Ever, BC Joined: 07.01.2007
|
|
|
Oh great another super soft forward. - Reubenkincade
Not all short offensive players are soft, look at Brayden Point, Brad Marchand, Brendan Gallagher, and evening Kaiser Yamamoto, he’s good defensively (Yammy) and he can put up offensive numbers. |
|
Pacificgem
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Swedish4Ever, BC Joined: 07.01.2007
|
|
|
Just installed a new hose on our kitchen faucet, what a royal pain in the ass that is to feed it back thru everything without getting hung up on something |
|
|
|
Just installed a new hose on our kitchen faucet, what a royal pain in the ass that is to feed it back thru everything without getting hung up on something - Pacificgem
PG’s house to be featured on an upcoming episode....
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Calgary
Toronto
Edmonton
Montreal
Winnipeg
Vancouver
Ottawa
Canucks win a lottery position and pick one of the studs on defense, like Owen Power or Brandt Clarke - Reubenkincade
2021 a heavy D draft no comsensus
I could live with getting Clarke RHD (need) frees up Schmidt for LHD & OJ or Rathbone teade chips, Guenther LW (need) allows Miller to play either wing, Johnson never enough C depth & allow a Gaudette trade if needed.
Next draft in 2022 is much better especially top 3 prospects. Heavy F draft. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Wright Savoie Lambert then McGroarty look real good in ‘22. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
Lost or didn't want ?
Tanev and Toffoli 8.75 mil
Schmidt and Virtanen 8.5 mil.
I think if Canucks really wanted Toffoli and Tanev they could have scraped together another quarter mil. - VANTEL
I agree. I think between Tanev's injuries and his singular game, they were hoping to upgrade if possible. Hughes played better with Myers even. Tanev definitely wasnt a must sign situation for them.
Now they have two of the best zone entry D's in the league instead with not giving anything up defensively. Younger and healthier as well... excellent upgrade.
|
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
He's got a way better shot at the calder this year then Podz does, am I the only one who sees that? - Pres.cup
Podz won't get a chance to start the season as a canuck so true dat....
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
I agree. I think between Tanev's injuries and his singular game, they were hoping to upgrade if possible. Hughes played better with Myers even. Tanev definitely wasnt a must sign situation for them.
Now they have two of the best zone entry D's in the league instead with not giving anything up defensively. Younger and healthier as well... excellent upgrade. - boonerbuck
Buys prospects time to develop their there they’re defensive game. I like having more mobility & offence to build upon.
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Podz won't get a chance to start the season as a canuck so true dat.... - boonerbuck
Might still qualify for the Calder in ‘22. |
|
|
|
I agree. I think between Tanev's injuries and his singular game, they were hoping to upgrade if possible. Hughes played better with Myers even. Tanev definitely wasnt a must sign situation for them.
Now they have two of the best zone entry D's in the league instead with not giving anything up defensively. Younger and healthier as well... excellent upgrade. - boonerbuck
Yeah they had more than a month to sign both of them to match their current contracts.
Benning said right after the playoffs " I thought Toffoli would score more in the playoffs" .
I think it had to do with term. Canucks did not sign one free agent longer than two years and good on them. |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
Vancouver added a top 4 defender.
Edmonton is going for the Leafs model of adding more soft scorers and figure out defensive next off season after we are bounced in the first round of the playoffs but never really figuring out defence. - manvanfan
Vancouver also lost a top 4 defender. Edmonton added a top 4 defender too. Same same but different. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
2021 a heavy D draft no comsensus
I could live with getting Clarke RHD (need) frees up Schmidt for LHD & OJ or Rathbone teade chips, Guenther LW (need) allows Miller to play either wing, Johnson never enough C depth & allow a Gaudette trade if needed.
Next draft in 2022 is much better especially top 3 prospects. Heavy F draft. - Nighthawk
That's good. 4 franchise D came out of the last top heavy D draft class 2008. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Vancouver also lost a top 4 defender. Edmonton added a top 4 defender too. Same same but different. - 1970vintage
Maybe you don't watch much Toronto games but Tyson Barrie's worth as an offensive defencemen takes a hit because his defensive is so far into the negative.
If you had a rating system of 50/50 for defence/offence. He would get 38/50 for offence. For defender he would get 4/50. So 42/100 That's not a top 4 D in the NHL. |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
Buys prospects time to develop their there they’re defensive game. I like having more mobility & offence to build upon. - Nighthawk
*theyeir're
|
|
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla! Joined: 08.15.2014
|
|
|
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla! Joined: 08.15.2014
|
|
|
Lost or didn't want ?
Tanev and Toffoli 8.75 mil
Schmidt and Virtanen 8.5 mil.
I think if Canucks really wanted Toffoli and Tanev they could have scraped together another quarter mil. - VANTEL
Tanev was offered 4 mil by JB and he opted to step back with the Flames for the extra $500,000. Fu*ck him.
We won without TT so why spend there?
Baffling sometimes lol... |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|