manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Frank Seravalli
@frank_seravalli
I'm told the #NHL has informed teams that when submitting Opening Night rosters by Tues. at 5pm ET, any changes made Wed. (for LTIR purposes) will count as if they were originally submitted on Tuesday. This is an interesting wrinkle for teams, because
The league feels that teams were not accurately reflecting their Opening Night rosters in their original submission and were "undermining" or "circumventing" the idea of it with changes shortly thereafter.
Teams don't want to operate in LTIR all season, so they like to get as close to the cap as possible for Day 1 (Tuesday) and THEN add their players to LTIR on Day 2 (Wednesday) to maximize the benefit.
It's interesting this year because a number of the teams that play on Wed. plan to be cap compliant using LTIR: Tampa Bay, St. Louis, Vancouver, Edmonton and Chicago.
This may force an opening night roster that team/coach may not have planned - at least for the first day. |
|
Marwood
|
|
|
Location: Cumberland, BC Joined: 03.18.2010
|
|
|
I couldn't find you're scouting report on him, apologies. - VanHockeyGuy
|
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
I couldn't find you're scouting report on him, apologies. - VanHockeyGuy
I wouldn't have made one for a guy who was never going to play in the NHL you f uck face.
|
|
|
|
Frank Seravalli
@frank_seravalli
I'm told the #NHL has informed teams that when submitting Opening Night rosters by Tues. at 5pm ET, any changes made Wed. (for LTIR purposes) will count as if they were originally submitted on Tuesday. This is an interesting wrinkle for teams, because
The league feels that teams were not accurately reflecting their Opening Night rosters in their original submission and were "undermining" or "circumventing" the idea of it with changes shortly thereafter.
Teams don't want to operate in LTIR all season, so they like to get as close to the cap as possible for Day 1 (Tuesday) and THEN add their players to LTIR on Day 2 (Wednesday) to maximize the benefit.
It's interesting this year because a number of the teams that play on Wed. plan to be cap compliant using LTIR: Tampa Bay, St. Louis, Vancouver, Edmonton and Chicago.
This may force an opening night roster that team/coach may not have planned - at least for the first day. - manvanfan
Typical NHL |
|
Pacificgem
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Victoria, BC Joined: 07.01.2007
|
|
|
Frank Seravalli
@frank_seravalli
I'm told the #NHL has informed teams that when submitting Opening Night rosters by Tues. at 5pm ET, any changes made Wed. (for LTIR purposes) will count as if they were originally submitted on Tuesday. This is an interesting wrinkle for teams, because
The league feels that teams were not accurately reflecting their Opening Night rosters in their original submission and were "undermining" or "circumventing" the idea of it with changes shortly thereafter.
Teams don't want to operate in LTIR all season, so they like to get as close to the cap as possible for Day 1 (Tuesday) and THEN add their players to LTIR on Day 2 (Wednesday) to maximize the benefit.
It's interesting this year because a number of the teams that play on Wed. plan to be cap compliant using LTIR: Tampa Bay, St. Louis, Vancouver, Edmonton and Chicago.
This may force an opening night roster that team/coach may not have planned - at least for the first day. - manvanfan
Interesting!! |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Typical NHL - VANTEL
So what exactly does this mean for teams? Basically just less players? Van would need to create 1.5M in cap space.
No Hamonic. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Rick Dhaliwal
@DhaliwalSports
SKA president Roman Rotenberg tells me that the reports are not true, Vasily Podkolzin is not being dropped to lower league "It is fake news, they made the stories up. Vasily will stay with us, he is on the team and will play for us tomorrow."
-----------
Russian factor taking on new meanings
Rick Dhaliwal
@DhaliwalSports
Rotenberg did admit that there were contract talks with Podkolzin this season to extend his contract.
Rotenberg is aware of the reports that Podkolzin will sign with the Canucks when his contract is up with SKA on April 30th, "We are focusing on the playoffs right now"
Rotenberg says he talked with Podkolzin today about the stories and Vasily told him that he did not know where they came from.
Rotenberg knows hockey crazy mad would like to see Podkolzin get more ice time, "You have to earn your ice time, Vasily is in important player for us." |
|
|
|
So what exactly does this mean for teams? Basically just less players? Van would need to create 1.5M in cap space. - manvanfan
Just means more players on waivers. The idea would be to get as close to the cap max to get biggest savings on LTIR. Teams just have to go to a 20 man roster to start day one. All teams should be okay except TB?
It means Ferland goes on LTIR on day 2 instead of day 1. Hamonic misses a game.
But typical NHL changing rules because someone tricked Gary
|
|
|
|
NBC drops Millbury and hires Babcock. Out of the pot and into the fire. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Just means more players on waivers. The idea would be to get as close to the cap max to get biggest savings on LTIR. Teams just have to go to a 20 man roster to start day one. All teams should be okay except TB?
It means Ferland goes on LTIR on day 2 instead of day 1. Hamonic misses a game.
But typical NHL changing rules because someone tricked Gary - VANTEL
So doubt Hoglander is going to play game 1 as well.
Canucks will have to put Chatfield, Brisebois, Sautner all on waivers as well. |
|
|
|
So doubt Hoglander is going to play game 1 as well.
Canucks will have to put Chatfield, Brisebois, Sautner all on waivers as well. - manvanfan
I think he stays. Graovac Bailey Sven Rathbone and a few more . We will find out in a few minutes.
They were going to have them on waivers anyways. Other teams have to expose some players . |
|
NewYorkNuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: New York, NY Joined: 07.11.2015
|
|
|
Just means more players on waivers. The idea would be to get as close to the cap max to get biggest savings on LTIR. Teams just have to go to a 20 man roster to start day one. All teams should be okay except TB?
It means Ferland goes on LTIR on day 2 instead of day 1. Hamonic misses a game.
But typical NHL changing rules because someone tricked Gary - VANTEL
Or they just run a 21 man roster for opening day? Put Loui and Benn on waivers, have Ferland on the roster, and sign Hamonic tomorrow?
Not sure if that's even feasible, though. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Or they just run a 21 man roster for opening day? Put Loui and Benn on waivers, have Ferland on the roster, and sign Hamonic tomorrow?
Not sure if that's even feasible, though. - NewYorkNuck
Good thread.
The rules for #Canucks fans playing around on
@CapFriendly
: you can capture LTI space, sign and recall players after setting your Opening Night roster but before puck drop Wednesday.
You can’t send anyone down before Game 1 if they’re on your opening night roster
------------------
I don't know if i'm understanding this right. |
|
|
|
Or they just run a 21 man roster for opening day? Put Loui and Benn on waivers, have Ferland on the roster, and sign Hamonic tomorrow?
Not sure if that's even feasible, though. - NewYorkNuck
They will have to sign Hamonic Thursday same as LTIR for Ferland
|
|
NewYorkNuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: New York, NY Joined: 07.11.2015
|
|
|
They will have to sign Hamonic Thursday same as LTIR for Ferland - VANTEL
I just tried it at Cap Friendly, so take it with a grain of salt because I have no idea if it's correct, but....
If you put LE, Beagle, Benn, Baertschi, and everyone else to the minors/taxi squad, you can keep Ferland on the opening night roster and have 1.9 in cap space. Not sure what the deal for Hamonic is though, if it's less than that. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
They will have to sign Hamonic Thursday same as LTIR for Ferland - VANTEL
Would make more sense to throw 3 guys who save the entire 1.075M on waivers and play Hoglander. |
|
|
|
I could see the Canucls grabbing a 3rd string goalie if a cheap one comes on the market via waivers. I figure MD is best to stay in the AHL all season? |
|
Pacificgem
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Victoria, BC Joined: 07.01.2007
|
|
|
Just means more players on waivers. The idea would be to get as close to the cap max to get biggest savings on LTIR. Teams just have to go to a 20 man roster to start day one. All teams should be okay except TB?
It means Ferland goes on LTIR on day 2 instead of day 1. Hamonic misses a game.
But typical NHL changing rules because someone tricked Gary - VANTEL
Bettaman is fine if you cheat one way, but not the other, it's ridiculous |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
I just tried it at Cap Friendly, so take it with a grain of salt because I have no idea if it's correct, but....
If you put LE, Beagle, Benn, Baertschi, and everyone else to the minors/taxi squad, you can keep Ferland on the opening night roster and have 1.9 in cap space. Not sure what the deal for Hamonic is though, if it's less than that. - NewYorkNuck
Hamonic would need to be 1M exactly then to have Hoggie and his 894K play otherwise short forward. |
|
NewYorkNuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: New York, NY Joined: 07.11.2015
|
|
|
Hamonic would need to be 1M exactly then. - manvanfan
Why's that? If they have 1.9 mil in cap space, couldn't he be anything under that?
Just saw your edit. My CapFriendly roster had Hoglander on it. |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
Elliotte Friedman
@FriedgeHNIC
·
28s
VAN announces six players on waivers, including Sven Baertschi & Loui Eriksson
Jeff Paterson
@patersonjeff
·
49s
Loui Eriksson has been designated for assignment by #Canucks |
|
NewYorkNuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: New York, NY Joined: 07.11.2015
|
|
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
Here it is
Following Canucks designated for assignment (so either AHL or taxi squad):
Justin Bailey
Sven Baertschi
Guillaume Brisebois
Loui Eriksson (!)
Tyler Graovac
Ashton Sautner |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Why's that? If they have 1.9 mil in cap space, couldn't he be anything under that?
Just saw your edit. My CapFriendly roster had Hoglander on it. - NewYorkNuck
Yeah, I think I missed a mill in there. |
|
NewYorkNuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: New York, NY Joined: 07.11.2015
|
|
|
Here it is
Following Canucks designated for assignment (so either AHL or taxi squad):
Justin Bailey
Sven Baertschi
Guillaume Brisebois
Loui Eriksson (!)
Tyler Graovac
Ashton Sautner - VanHockeyGuy
Reasonable. Don't foresee anyone getting claimed. |
|