Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Not really. - Reubenkincade
In our case no help. Mostly due to contract structures. |
|
|
|
I want a 3rd and an open spot for Podz when he gets here. I think I'm just tired of watching Jake fly down the wing and lose the puck plus he's up with Myers as the heaviest players on the team but you wouldn't know it by his play. I've much preferred Gaudette on the wing the last 2 games. - A_SteamingLombardi
👍 |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
As it stands for next season
Hughes Myers
OJ Schmidt
Raff Chatfield
Honestly, I'd rather beef up the LHD, unless we move Myers. - Pres.cup
Rafferty is RHD so...
Hughes Myers
Schmidt Chatfield
OJ Rafferty
Rathbone
or
Hughes Myers
Schmidt Savard
OJ Chatfield
Rathbone Rafferty |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Until now Benning has bought out one contract. If his ELCs keep working out I don't see a need to buy out someone .
I think next year they will let Pearson walk and replace him with Pod and move Jake and replace him with Lind. That might be it for the forwards . I think they will trade Loui for a pick on his last year. - VANTEL
Yup but I think Loui will rot somewhere |
|
|
|
Rafferty is RHD so...
Hughes Myers
Schmidt Chatfield
OJ Rafferty
Rathbone
or
Hughes Myers
Schmidt Savard
OJ Chatfield
Rathbone Rafferty - Nighthawk
It will be a defenseman chosen in the expansion draft. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
It will be a defenseman chosen in the expansion draft. - Reubenkincade
I don’t understand what you mean? |
|
|
|
Jeff Paterson
@patersonjeff
· 10m
with MacEwen's goal tonight, that's now 12 goals from #Canucks bottom six in first 11 games (Motte 5, Sutter 4, MacEwen, Gaudette & Virtanen). That's been a wildly pleasant surprise |
|
neem55
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 02.02.2012
|
|
|
neem55
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 02.02.2012
|
|
|
[quote=Brooks_Light]Savard is a much better option in terms of what will realistically happen. He's a solid defender, tough as nails & great leader. I think he'll be sought after but if we could land him for 4X3 that would be ideal. The only other UFA I really like is Oleksiak - Reubenkincade[/quote]
Agreed on both these guys.
Isn’t Savard like 90 and cant skate?!
Edit: 30, but also why is Columbus trading him? Maybe at the tdl if they are out. |
|
|
|
I don’t understand what you mean? - Nighthawk
Chatfield, OJ and Rafferty potentially exposed. I am sure Kraken would like a younger defenseman or 2.
The available forwards won't be touched, nor do I think they will take Holtby, with several younger goalies available. |
|
|
|
It will be a defenseman chosen in the expansion draft. - Reubenkincade
Agreed, that is why I think they should expose Myers and protect three others. Doubt Seattle chooses Myers but if they did then just bonus cap space |
|
|
|
Chatfield, OJ and Rafferty potentially exposed. I am sure Kraken would like a younger defenseman or 2.
The available forwards won't be touched, nor do I think they will take Holtby, with several younger goalies available. - Reubenkincade
I am not sure Rafferty needs to be protected but am not sure.
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Chatfield, OJ and Rafferty potentially exposed. I am sure Kraken would like a younger defenseman or 2.
The available forwards won't be touched, nor do I think they will take Holtby, with several younger goalies available. - Reubenkincade
Lind could be exposed |
|
Pres.cup
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Making the most of the worst situation... Canuck fan 4life , BC Joined: 12.23.2014
|
|
|
Well the cap will be stagnant but will start to rise again in 2022 or more likely 2023. That said I said Savard is on my radar since Hamilton is likely staying in Carolina. The cap allocation works on capfriendly which I posted awhile ago on here. - Nighthawk
The players have to repay the losses over the next 5 years, the cap isn't gonna rise for awhile |
|
|
|
I am not sure Rafferty needs to be protected but am not sure. - VANTEL
Carol brought it up in a blog awhile back, something to do with his age and he played a game or 2 that year he signed. |
|
|
|
Lind could be exposed - Nighthawk
Why?
Name 7 forwards you would protect over him. I can't, even if he sh its the bed this year, I protect him over Jake. |
|
|
|
Carol brought it up in a blog awhile back, something to do with his age and he played a game or 2 that year he signed. - Reubenkincade
Well that sucks.
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Trade JV to a team needing scoring.
Then Lind can be protected. |
|
|
|
Why?
Name 7 forwards you would protect over him. I can't, even if he shits the bed this year, I protect him over Jake. - Reubenkincade
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
The players have to repay the losses over the next 5 years, the cap isn't gonna rise for awhile - Pres.cup
👍 |
|
|
|
Isn’t Savard like 90 and cant skate?!
Edit: 30, but also why is Columbus trading him? Maybe at the tdl if they are out. - neem55
Off-season UFA signing, is what we were talking about. |
|
|
|
Trade JV to a team needing scoring.
Then Lind can be protected. - Nighthawk
Doing my best Nighthawk impersonation, you never answered my question.😁 |
|
|
|
As crazy as this sounds the four D I would protect are Hughes Chatfield OJ and Rafferty?
I really don't know much about Rafferty but the game I did see him play he looked very smart.
I forgot about Schmidt . He is the fourth guy not Rafferty |
|
|
|
Well that sucks. - VANTEL
It does, but the team will lose a player regardless, so rather lose a Rafferty than Chatfield or OJ.
Maybe they give them Rafferty to take Jake. |
|
|
|
As crazy as this sounds the four D I would protect are Hughes Chatfield OJ and Rafferty?
I really don't know much about Rafferty but the game I did see him play he looked very smart. - VANTEL
They can only protect 3, unless they protect 8 skaters.
Edit; Hughes doesn't need protecting. |
|