Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Carol Schram: Canucks' Abbotsford affiliate lands in AHL's Pacific Division next season
Author Message
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Jun 13 @ 7:13 PM ET
Why is it unfair to knock Sutter? You yourself said he can't stay healthy. He's not fast. He's not physical. He's old(er). He's not putting up points. Sure, he PKs and takes faceoffs, but other people can do that too.

And I already said, he can be replaced by Graovac. I also like Wennberg (but that is more 3C), Nosek, Haula... I'm sure there are going to be guys on the market both trade and buyouts that will be available that are better than Sutter.

- NewYorkNuck

Graovac cannot stay healthy & you want him on the PK?

No problem replacing Sutter but it has to work other than just moving on from him.
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Jun 13 @ 7:15 PM ET
What was it exactly, that makes you insert Lockwood into the lineup over the others.
He played 2 nhl games, was -2 and wasn't impressive?

- Reubenkincade

Speed & grit.

Want Roussel gone. Mac isn’t getting it done. Lind didn’t show he’s ready. Not using a UFA. A spot open to be won internally.
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Jun 13 @ 7:17 PM ET
Defense can be taught, but PK can't be?
- Reubenkincade

If a 4th liner has to be taught he’s an AHLer.
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Jun 13 @ 7:18 PM ET
I would say, start the rebuild.
- Reubenkincade

Lets hear it lol
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Jun 13 @ 7:19 PM ET
I forget who said it (maybe Vintsy ) Sutter will end up in CGY . I don't think Canucks should try to match the offer.

What I find interesting is when rosters get built by ACGMs and you see Highmore Zack Motte Sutter Lind or whoever on it . You can't have change unless you move on from players. (Not directed at you).

You can go a different route of Zack Motte Highmore and so on and bring in a different bottom 6.

- VANTEL


It will be very difficult for Sutter to come back to the Canucks on a $1m deal (same with Edler on a low dollar deal). Like it or not, players have pride, and human nature suggests that people won’t do the same job for less, or much less. It would be like asking Jim to step down and be a head scout (even at the same $).

It’s too bad, but it’s probably what will happen. For Sutter to join the Flames for $1m he gets to save face, suggest he is joining a team he sees promise in, it’s a good fit, coming home etc.

Edler I could see signing for below market value ($2mish), but I bet if he shopped around he could get a couple years with a contender to play 3rd pair and PK
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Jun 13 @ 7:20 PM ET
I’m cool with debates but lets go further into it. Back it up with line projections. Talking the bottom 6.
Reubenkincade
Location: BC
Joined: 11.18.2016

Jun 13 @ 7:20 PM ET
If a 4th liner has to be taught he’s an AHLer.
- Nighthawk


What about a top 6 player or a defenseman?
NewYorkNuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: New York, NY
Joined: 07.11.2015

Jun 13 @ 7:20 PM ET
It’s one thing I post line-ups & another thing if picked apart. That’s 1/2 way to nowhere if not countered with replacements. Role players are needed for PK & energy & if in game injuries able to take on more minutes.

So which is it... Play more kids or get more UFA’s or resign cheap vets?

- Nighthawk


So sensitive. Sheesh. If you're posting lineups, they're going to get picked apart.

Why is it such an either/or scenario. Can you not play more kids and sign some depth players? I posted a lineup the other day and can't find it/can't be bothered to search.

Graovac cannot stay healthy & you want him on the PK?

No problem replacing Sutter but it has to work other than just moving on from him.


Sutter cannot stay healthy and you want him on the PK?

You can train people to PK. Motte, Highmore, Pearson, Bo, JTM.. all capable of playing the PK.
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Jun 13 @ 7:22 PM ET
It will be very difficult for Sutter to come back to the Canucks on a $1m deal (same with Edler on a low dollar deal). Like it or not, players have pride, and human nature suggests that people won’t do the same job for less, or much less. It would be like asking Jim to step down and be a head scout (even at the same $).

It’s too bad, but it’s probably what will happen. For Sutter to join the Flames for $1m he gets to save face, suggest he is joining a team he sees promise in, it’s a good fit, coming home etc.

Edler I could see signing for below market value ($2mish), but I bet if he shopped around he could get a couple years with a contender to play 3rd pair and PK

- 1970vintage

Fair enough if they move on 👍

They wanna stay it’s on the cheap or promote from within or get UFA’s or e-draft trade in advance.
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Jun 13 @ 7:24 PM ET
What about a top 6 player or a defenseman?
- Reubenkincade

Apples n oranges

4th liners are dime a dozen. D is the hardest skating position to play & is a constant learning process.
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Jun 13 @ 7:25 PM ET
So sensitive. Sheesh. If you're posting lineups, they're going to get picked apart.

Why is it such an either/or scenario. Can you not play more kids and sign some depth players? I posted a lineup the other day and can't find it/can't be bothered to search.



Sutter cannot stay healthy and you want him on the PK?

You can train people to PK. Motte, Highmore, Pearson, Bo, JTM.. all capable of playing the PK.

- NewYorkNuck

Start over. Post a line up 👍
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Jun 13 @ 7:28 PM ET
Playing 5v5 PP & PK are for a select few. Not many like Bergeron & Marchand type players to go around.

If 4th liners are so limited then give them 6-8mins a game but the top 3 lines have to produce & not burn out.
NewYorkNuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: New York, NY
Joined: 07.11.2015

Jun 13 @ 7:28 PM ET
I’m cool with debates but lets go further into it. Back it up with line projections. Talking the bottom 6.
- Nighthawk


JTM - Petey - Boes
Pearson - Bo - Hoglander
Sanford - Wennberg - Podkolzin
Motte - Graovac/Boyd - Highmore

Schmidt - Myers
Hughes - Hamonic
Rathbone - Larsson
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Jun 13 @ 7:31 PM ET
JTM - Petey - Boes
Pearson - Bo - Hoglander
Sanford - Wennberg - Podkolzin
Motte - Graovac/Boyd - Highmore

Schmidt - Myers
Hughes - Hamonic
Rathbone - Larsson

- NewYorkNuck

How much are Wennberg ZS & AL signing for?
FYI I like Graovac & he looked like he belonged other than fragile.
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Jun 13 @ 7:33 PM ET
Fair enough if they move on 👍

They wanna stay it’s on the cheap or promote from within or get UFA’s or e-draft trade in advance.

- Nighthawk



I’m just saying it’s unfair to ask an employee (player) to continue doing the same job for much less. You aren’t asking Sutter to do anything differently than he is doing now, and what he gets paid impacts how other employees see him.

I agree, what he provides isn’t worth the $ anymore, but I can’t see him staying for a Lord H.
NewYorkNuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: New York, NY
Joined: 07.11.2015

Jun 13 @ 7:35 PM ET
How much are Wennberg ZS & AL signing for?
FYI I like Graovac & he looked like he belonged other than fragile.

- Nighthawk


Not exactly sure, but Wennberg maybe around 3. Sanford is a trade (1.5 cap hit right now, then RFA next year). Larsson around 4.5? I have no exact idea.

Have to move a little money out, but it's doable.
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Jun 13 @ 7:36 PM ET
I’m just saying it’s unfair to ask an employee (player) to continue doing the same job for much less. You aren’t asking Sutter to do anything differently than he is doing now, and what he gets paid impacts how other employees see him.

I agree, what he provides isn’t worth the $ anymore, but I can’t see him staying for a Lord H.

- 1970vintage

It’s professional sports bro. They are owed nothing & free to move on. He gets paid for when he plays so should be a piece work contract or adios. He hasn’t given value for his 4yr contract.
onesmallleap
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Be Calm n Swede On, BC
Joined: 09.23.2015

Jun 13 @ 7:37 PM ET
Which park?
- Marwood


Liking parkh
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Jun 13 @ 7:38 PM ET
Not exactly sure, but Wennberg maybe around 3. Sanford is a trade (1.5 cap hit right now, then RFA next year). Larsson around 4.5? I have no exact idea.

Have to move a little money out, but it's doable.

- NewYorkNuck

Ok. What asset(s) for Sanford?
I’ll draw up an ACGM for us.

https://www.capfriendly.c.../armchair-gm/team/2470180

Done. Have to move out 1.4m or use more creative ideas.
Reubenkincade
Location: BC
Joined: 11.18.2016

Jun 13 @ 7:47 PM ET
Ok. What asset(s) for Sanford?
I’ll draw up an ACGM for us.

- Nighthawk


I look forward to seeing it.
NewYorkNuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: New York, NY
Joined: 07.11.2015

Jun 13 @ 7:50 PM ET
Ok. What asset(s) for Sanford?
I’ll draw up an ACGM for us.

- Nighthawk


Does it really matter? Send a third and Rafferty or some depth player.
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Jun 13 @ 7:50 PM ET
I look forward to seeing it.
- Reubenkincade


https://www.capfriendly.c.../armchair-gm/team/2470180
Reubenkincade
Location: BC
Joined: 11.18.2016

Jun 13 @ 7:57 PM ET
https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/2470180
- Nighthawk


Interesting
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Jun 13 @ 7:57 PM ET
It’s professional sports bro. They are owed nothing & free to move on. He gets paid for when he plays so should be a piece work contract or adios. He hasn’t given value for his 4yr contract.
- Nighthawk


It’s professional sports to you, it’s a career for him. If the organization didn’t get value for their money it’s because they didn’t evaluate their needs correctly, or they didn’t evaluate their employee correctly.

This mentality of he can stay for cheap or see ya is something only a fan would say. What if he signs a $3m contract, what would you say then? “Well Benning must know what he’s doing”?

End of the day, I don’t think they can afford to keep him, and I don’t think he takes a league minimum contract to stay.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Jun 13 @ 8:01 PM ET
No problem with Motte. Highmore worth another look. MacEwen doesn't impress me at all. Sure he stands up for mates & the ofd fight but he disappears all too often. Very lil impact every game. Move on from him. So who are the new 2 C’s?
- Nighthawk


I would rather go the trade route but free agents you could look at Danault Zajack Stasny . They would all come in around 5 mil . Cheaper ones Wennberg Nosek Haula.

I would rather go by trade even something like Schmidt plus for Kuznetsov or Kadri for?



Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next