Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Carol Schram: Canucks' Alex Edler test free agency; Abbotsford announces coaching staff
Author Message
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.24.2014

Jul 17 @ 12:03 PM ET
Yeah because there’s been so many deals to be had so far
- Nucker101


I literally just said everyone has been quiet....
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks
Location: Shark City, CA
Joined: 07.03.2009

Jul 17 @ 12:04 PM ET
If the deadline comes and goes, and there was nothing done, I think it will be a pretty big failure on his part, considering what he told the media and other GMs.
- Codes1087

He's says stupid shit every year and the slurpers eat it up. Quite honestly, what's he going to do? He's never in a position of strength trying to make deals and the team as a whole has very few quality players, which is why they're most likely protecting a kid like Kole Lind with six games of unimpressive NHL experience.
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Jul 17 @ 12:06 PM ET
If the deadline comes and goes, and there was nothing done, I think it will be a pretty big failure on his part, considering what he told the media and other GMs.
- Codes1087

You still believe what he says?
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Jul 17 @ 12:06 PM ET
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Jul 17 @ 12:06 PM ET
Trades...
- LeftCoaster

Then 8 year contracts?
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.24.2014

Jul 17 @ 12:07 PM ET
You still believe what he says?
- manvanfan


The slurpers believe everything he says, the haters think he's always lying. I give him the benefit of the doubt until it's too late.
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Jul 17 @ 12:07 PM ET
He's says stupid shit every year and the slurpers eat it up. Quite honestly, what's he going to do? He's never in a position of strength trying to make deals and the team as a whole has very few quality players, which is why they're most likely protecting a kid like Kole Lind with six games of unimpressive NHL experience.
- LeftCoaster

Need to keep the 2nd for this draft. 3rd also.
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks
Location: Shark City, CA
Joined: 07.03.2009

Jul 17 @ 12:08 PM ET
Then 8 year contracts?
- manvanfan

For EP40 and QH, I think they get shorter term deals but they're still going to eat up 14 million in cap space IMO.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Jul 17 @ 12:08 PM ET
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Jul 17 @ 12:09 PM ET
The slurpers believe everything he says, the haters think he's always lying. I give him the benefit of the doubt until it's too late.
- Codes1087

If he does something, he does. If not. Another high pick maybe 😍
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Jul 17 @ 12:10 PM ET
For EP40 and QH, I think they get shorter term deals but they're still going to eat up 14 million in cap space IMO.
- LeftCoaster

They should lock up their franchise players.
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.24.2014

Jul 17 @ 12:11 PM ET
If he does something, he does. If not. Another high pick maybe 😍
- manvanfan


Unfortunately the NHL isn't like the NBA. Blockbuster trades aren't a yearly thing like basketball. We should all be prepared for a very quiet day for the Canucks.
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Jul 17 @ 12:12 PM ET
For EP40 and QH, I think they get shorter term deals but they're still going to eat up 14 million in cap space IMO.
- LeftCoaster


Think EP will get 3 years, a bit more than Boeser got. Think Hughes will go either 2 or 4 year. Might take a very short bridge, leaving 2 RFA years or take it right to the edge. 2 years, $4.5 per or 4 years $5.75 per

$14 seems high to me unless one of them goes 8 years.
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks
Location: Shark City, CA
Joined: 07.03.2009

Jul 17 @ 12:12 PM ET
They should lock up their franchise players.
- manvanfan

It's been reported they're looking for shorter term deals to get past the flat cap years. Trying to maximize money down the road I guess.
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Jul 17 @ 12:12 PM ET
For EP40 and QH, I think they get shorter term deals but they're still going to eat up 14 million in cap space IMO.
- LeftCoaster

Nah
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks
Location: Shark City, CA
Joined: 07.03.2009

Jul 17 @ 12:14 PM ET
Think EP will get 3 years, a bit more than Boeser got. Think Hughes will go either 2 or 4 year. Might take a very short bridge, leaving 2 RFA years or take it right to the edge. 2 years, $4.5 per or 4 years $5.75 per

$14 seems high to me unless one of them goes 8 years.

- 1970vintage

Barzal signed for 7 million/yr on a shorter three year deal, zero chance IMO that EP40 signs for anything south of that.
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Jul 17 @ 12:18 PM ET
Barzal signed for 7 million on a shorter deal, zero chance IMO that EP40 signs for anything south of that.
- LeftCoaster


Depends on how they structure the contract. For example, if Petey gets say $6.5 AAV over three years, but his annual salary is $3.5m, $6.5m, $9.5m then his QO starts at $9.5.

I’m not sure if they can actually stretch that out this much, not sure what the year to year variation is allowed to be, but you get the idea.
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Jul 17 @ 12:19 PM ET
It's been reported they're looking for shorter term deals to get past the flat cap years. Trying to maximize money down the road I guess.
- LeftCoaster

Spoiled mofos
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Jul 17 @ 12:20 PM ET
Unfortunately the NHL isn't like the NBA. Blockbuster trades aren't a yearly thing like basketball. We should all be prepared for a very quiet day for the Canucks.
- Codes1087

Yeah cant protect really anyone unless they get rid of someone.

Schmidt can go to someone who losses a defender
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Jul 17 @ 12:21 PM ET
Depends on how they structure the contract. For example, if Petey gets say $6.5 AAV over three years, but his annual salary is $3.5m, $6.5m, $9.5m then his QO starts at $9.5.

I’m not sure if they can actually stretch that out this much, not sure what the year to year variation is allowed to be, but you get the idea.

- 1970vintage
is that the new rule or old one?
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks
Location: Shark City, CA
Joined: 07.03.2009

Jul 17 @ 12:22 PM ET
Depends on how they structure the contract. For example, if Petey gets say $6.5 AAV over three years, but his annual salary is $3.5m, $6.5m, $9.5m then his QO starts at $9.5.

I’m not sure if they can actually stretch that out this much, not sure what the year to year variation is allowed to be, but you get the idea.

- 1970vintage

I'm guessing 7 million a year for Petey and 6.75 million a year for Quinn Hughes. But what the hell do I know.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Jul 17 @ 12:22 PM ET
Depends on how they structure the contract. For example, if Petey gets say $6.5 AAV over three years, but his annual salary is $3.5m, $6.5m, $9.5m then his QO starts at $9.5.

I’m not sure if they can actually stretch that out this much, not sure what the year to year variation is allowed to be, but you get the idea.

- 1970vintage


I think they changed that. When they returned to the bubble they did a quick update on the CBA .

Contracts signed after July 1 2020 no longer have to use the last year of the previous contract as the QO but rather the AAV has to be the QO or higher.

1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Jul 17 @ 12:29 PM ET
is that the new rule or old one?
- manvanfan


?

Pretty sure that there is a rule that the salary can’t change by more than 50% of the AAV per year or something? So in this case by $3.25m per year.
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Jul 17 @ 12:32 PM ET
I think they changed that. When they returned to the bubble they did a quick update on the CBA .

Contracts signed after July 1 2020 no longer have to use the last year of the previous contract as the QO but rather the AAV has to be the QO or higher.

- VANTEL


Ahh, hadn’t heard that. Well, doesn’t really make any difference how they structure the deals anymore then.

Though on long deals I can still see them going heavy on bonus and light on salary to protect against buyouts.


From Capfriendly:

For players who are on expiring contracts that were signed after July 10, 2020:
The Qualifying Offer is limited to 120% of their previous contracts annual average (AAV)
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Jul 17 @ 12:33 PM ET
Ahh, hadn’t heard that. Well, doesn’t really make any difference how they structure the deals anymore then.

Though on long deals I can still see them going heavy on bonus and light on salary to protect against buyouts.

- 1970vintage


CBA Reference 10.2 (a) (ii)
For players who are on expiring contracts that were signed after July 10, 2020:
The Qualifying Offer is limited to 120% of their previous contracts annual average (AAV)
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28  Next